Cargando…

Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm

Drug development in oncology commonly exploits the tools of molecular biology to gain therapeutic benefit through reprograming of cellular responses. In immuno‐oncology (IO) the aim is to direct the patient’s own immune system to fight cancer. After remarkable successes of antibodies targeting PD1/P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi, Lazarou, Georgia, Bhatnagar, Sumit, Gibbs, John P., Nijsen, Marjoleen, Ray, Avijit, Stoll, Brian, Thompson, R. Adam, Gulati, Abhishek, Soukharev, Serguei, Yamada, Akihiro, Weddell, Jared, Sayama, Hiroyuki, Oishi, Masayo, Wittemer‐Rump, Sabine, Patel, Chirag, Niederalt, Christoph, Burghaus, Rolf, Scheerans, Christian, Lippert, Jörg, Kabilan, Senthil, Kareva, Irina, Belousova, Natalya, Rolfe, Alex, Zutshi, Anup, Chenel, Marylore, Venezia, Filippo, Fouliard, Sylvain, Oberwittler, Heike, Scholer‐Dahirel, Alix, Lelievre, Helene, Bottino, Dean, Collins, Sabrina C., Nguyen, Hoa Q., Wang, Haiqing, Yoneyama, Tomoki, Zhu, Andy Z.X., van der Graaf, Piet H., Kierzek, Andrzej M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32686076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1987
_version_ 1783667969275985920
author Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi
Lazarou, Georgia
Bhatnagar, Sumit
Gibbs, John P.
Nijsen, Marjoleen
Ray, Avijit
Stoll, Brian
Thompson, R. Adam
Gulati, Abhishek
Soukharev, Serguei
Yamada, Akihiro
Weddell, Jared
Sayama, Hiroyuki
Oishi, Masayo
Wittemer‐Rump, Sabine
Patel, Chirag
Niederalt, Christoph
Burghaus, Rolf
Scheerans, Christian
Lippert, Jörg
Kabilan, Senthil
Kareva, Irina
Belousova, Natalya
Rolfe, Alex
Zutshi, Anup
Chenel, Marylore
Venezia, Filippo
Fouliard, Sylvain
Oberwittler, Heike
Scholer‐Dahirel, Alix
Lelievre, Helene
Bottino, Dean
Collins, Sabrina C.
Nguyen, Hoa Q.
Wang, Haiqing
Yoneyama, Tomoki
Zhu, Andy Z.X.
van der Graaf, Piet H.
Kierzek, Andrzej M.
author_facet Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi
Lazarou, Georgia
Bhatnagar, Sumit
Gibbs, John P.
Nijsen, Marjoleen
Ray, Avijit
Stoll, Brian
Thompson, R. Adam
Gulati, Abhishek
Soukharev, Serguei
Yamada, Akihiro
Weddell, Jared
Sayama, Hiroyuki
Oishi, Masayo
Wittemer‐Rump, Sabine
Patel, Chirag
Niederalt, Christoph
Burghaus, Rolf
Scheerans, Christian
Lippert, Jörg
Kabilan, Senthil
Kareva, Irina
Belousova, Natalya
Rolfe, Alex
Zutshi, Anup
Chenel, Marylore
Venezia, Filippo
Fouliard, Sylvain
Oberwittler, Heike
Scholer‐Dahirel, Alix
Lelievre, Helene
Bottino, Dean
Collins, Sabrina C.
Nguyen, Hoa Q.
Wang, Haiqing
Yoneyama, Tomoki
Zhu, Andy Z.X.
van der Graaf, Piet H.
Kierzek, Andrzej M.
author_sort Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi
collection PubMed
description Drug development in oncology commonly exploits the tools of molecular biology to gain therapeutic benefit through reprograming of cellular responses. In immuno‐oncology (IO) the aim is to direct the patient’s own immune system to fight cancer. After remarkable successes of antibodies targeting PD1/PD‐L1 and CTLA4 receptors in targeted patient populations, the focus of further development has shifted toward combination therapies. However, the current drug‐development approach of exploiting a vast number of possible combination targets and dosing regimens has proven to be challenging and is arguably inefficient. In particular, the unprecedented number of clinical trials testing different combinations may no longer be sustainable by the population of available patients. Further development in IO requires a step change in selection and validation of candidate therapies to decrease development attrition rate and limit the number of clinical trials. Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) proposes to tackle this challenge through mechanistic modeling and simulation. Compounds’ pharmacokinetics, target binding, and mechanisms of action as well as existing knowledge on the underlying tumor and immune system biology are described by quantitative, dynamic models aiming to predict clinical results for novel combinations. Here, we review the current QSP approaches, the legacy of mathematical models available to quantitative clinical pharmacologists describing interaction between tumor and immune system, and the recent development of IO QSP platform models. We argue that QSP and virtual patients can be integrated as a new tool in existing IO drug development approaches to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the search for novel combination therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7983940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79839402021-03-25 Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi Lazarou, Georgia Bhatnagar, Sumit Gibbs, John P. Nijsen, Marjoleen Ray, Avijit Stoll, Brian Thompson, R. Adam Gulati, Abhishek Soukharev, Serguei Yamada, Akihiro Weddell, Jared Sayama, Hiroyuki Oishi, Masayo Wittemer‐Rump, Sabine Patel, Chirag Niederalt, Christoph Burghaus, Rolf Scheerans, Christian Lippert, Jörg Kabilan, Senthil Kareva, Irina Belousova, Natalya Rolfe, Alex Zutshi, Anup Chenel, Marylore Venezia, Filippo Fouliard, Sylvain Oberwittler, Heike Scholer‐Dahirel, Alix Lelievre, Helene Bottino, Dean Collins, Sabrina C. Nguyen, Hoa Q. Wang, Haiqing Yoneyama, Tomoki Zhu, Andy Z.X. van der Graaf, Piet H. Kierzek, Andrzej M. Clin Pharmacol Ther Reviews Drug development in oncology commonly exploits the tools of molecular biology to gain therapeutic benefit through reprograming of cellular responses. In immuno‐oncology (IO) the aim is to direct the patient’s own immune system to fight cancer. After remarkable successes of antibodies targeting PD1/PD‐L1 and CTLA4 receptors in targeted patient populations, the focus of further development has shifted toward combination therapies. However, the current drug‐development approach of exploiting a vast number of possible combination targets and dosing regimens has proven to be challenging and is arguably inefficient. In particular, the unprecedented number of clinical trials testing different combinations may no longer be sustainable by the population of available patients. Further development in IO requires a step change in selection and validation of candidate therapies to decrease development attrition rate and limit the number of clinical trials. Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) proposes to tackle this challenge through mechanistic modeling and simulation. Compounds’ pharmacokinetics, target binding, and mechanisms of action as well as existing knowledge on the underlying tumor and immune system biology are described by quantitative, dynamic models aiming to predict clinical results for novel combinations. Here, we review the current QSP approaches, the legacy of mathematical models available to quantitative clinical pharmacologists describing interaction between tumor and immune system, and the recent development of IO QSP platform models. We argue that QSP and virtual patients can be integrated as a new tool in existing IO drug development approaches to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the search for novel combination therapies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-14 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7983940/ /pubmed/32686076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1987 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi
Lazarou, Georgia
Bhatnagar, Sumit
Gibbs, John P.
Nijsen, Marjoleen
Ray, Avijit
Stoll, Brian
Thompson, R. Adam
Gulati, Abhishek
Soukharev, Serguei
Yamada, Akihiro
Weddell, Jared
Sayama, Hiroyuki
Oishi, Masayo
Wittemer‐Rump, Sabine
Patel, Chirag
Niederalt, Christoph
Burghaus, Rolf
Scheerans, Christian
Lippert, Jörg
Kabilan, Senthil
Kareva, Irina
Belousova, Natalya
Rolfe, Alex
Zutshi, Anup
Chenel, Marylore
Venezia, Filippo
Fouliard, Sylvain
Oberwittler, Heike
Scholer‐Dahirel, Alix
Lelievre, Helene
Bottino, Dean
Collins, Sabrina C.
Nguyen, Hoa Q.
Wang, Haiqing
Yoneyama, Tomoki
Zhu, Andy Z.X.
van der Graaf, Piet H.
Kierzek, Andrzej M.
Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm
title Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm
title_full Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm
title_fullStr Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm
title_short Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm
title_sort quantitative systems pharmacology approaches for immuno‐oncology: adding virtual patients to the development paradigm
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32686076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1987
work_keys_str_mv AT chelliahvijayalakshmi quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT lazarougeorgia quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT bhatnagarsumit quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT gibbsjohnp quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT nijsenmarjoleen quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT rayavijit quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT stollbrian quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT thompsonradam quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT gulatiabhishek quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT soukharevserguei quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT yamadaakihiro quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT weddelljared quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT sayamahiroyuki quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT oishimasayo quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT wittemerrumpsabine quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT patelchirag quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT niederaltchristoph quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT burghausrolf quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT scheeranschristian quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT lippertjorg quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT kabilansenthil quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT karevairina quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT belousovanatalya quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT rolfealex quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT zutshianup quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT chenelmarylore quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT veneziafilippo quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT fouliardsylvain quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT oberwittlerheike quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT scholerdahirelalix quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT lelievrehelene quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT bottinodean quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT collinssabrinac quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT nguyenhoaq quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT wanghaiqing quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT yoneyamatomoki quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT zhuandyzx quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT vandergraafpieth quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm
AT kierzekandrzejm quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm