Cargando…
Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm
Drug development in oncology commonly exploits the tools of molecular biology to gain therapeutic benefit through reprograming of cellular responses. In immuno‐oncology (IO) the aim is to direct the patient’s own immune system to fight cancer. After remarkable successes of antibodies targeting PD1/P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32686076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1987 |
_version_ | 1783667969275985920 |
---|---|
author | Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi Lazarou, Georgia Bhatnagar, Sumit Gibbs, John P. Nijsen, Marjoleen Ray, Avijit Stoll, Brian Thompson, R. Adam Gulati, Abhishek Soukharev, Serguei Yamada, Akihiro Weddell, Jared Sayama, Hiroyuki Oishi, Masayo Wittemer‐Rump, Sabine Patel, Chirag Niederalt, Christoph Burghaus, Rolf Scheerans, Christian Lippert, Jörg Kabilan, Senthil Kareva, Irina Belousova, Natalya Rolfe, Alex Zutshi, Anup Chenel, Marylore Venezia, Filippo Fouliard, Sylvain Oberwittler, Heike Scholer‐Dahirel, Alix Lelievre, Helene Bottino, Dean Collins, Sabrina C. Nguyen, Hoa Q. Wang, Haiqing Yoneyama, Tomoki Zhu, Andy Z.X. van der Graaf, Piet H. Kierzek, Andrzej M. |
author_facet | Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi Lazarou, Georgia Bhatnagar, Sumit Gibbs, John P. Nijsen, Marjoleen Ray, Avijit Stoll, Brian Thompson, R. Adam Gulati, Abhishek Soukharev, Serguei Yamada, Akihiro Weddell, Jared Sayama, Hiroyuki Oishi, Masayo Wittemer‐Rump, Sabine Patel, Chirag Niederalt, Christoph Burghaus, Rolf Scheerans, Christian Lippert, Jörg Kabilan, Senthil Kareva, Irina Belousova, Natalya Rolfe, Alex Zutshi, Anup Chenel, Marylore Venezia, Filippo Fouliard, Sylvain Oberwittler, Heike Scholer‐Dahirel, Alix Lelievre, Helene Bottino, Dean Collins, Sabrina C. Nguyen, Hoa Q. Wang, Haiqing Yoneyama, Tomoki Zhu, Andy Z.X. van der Graaf, Piet H. Kierzek, Andrzej M. |
author_sort | Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Drug development in oncology commonly exploits the tools of molecular biology to gain therapeutic benefit through reprograming of cellular responses. In immuno‐oncology (IO) the aim is to direct the patient’s own immune system to fight cancer. After remarkable successes of antibodies targeting PD1/PD‐L1 and CTLA4 receptors in targeted patient populations, the focus of further development has shifted toward combination therapies. However, the current drug‐development approach of exploiting a vast number of possible combination targets and dosing regimens has proven to be challenging and is arguably inefficient. In particular, the unprecedented number of clinical trials testing different combinations may no longer be sustainable by the population of available patients. Further development in IO requires a step change in selection and validation of candidate therapies to decrease development attrition rate and limit the number of clinical trials. Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) proposes to tackle this challenge through mechanistic modeling and simulation. Compounds’ pharmacokinetics, target binding, and mechanisms of action as well as existing knowledge on the underlying tumor and immune system biology are described by quantitative, dynamic models aiming to predict clinical results for novel combinations. Here, we review the current QSP approaches, the legacy of mathematical models available to quantitative clinical pharmacologists describing interaction between tumor and immune system, and the recent development of IO QSP platform models. We argue that QSP and virtual patients can be integrated as a new tool in existing IO drug development approaches to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the search for novel combination therapies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7983940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79839402021-03-25 Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi Lazarou, Georgia Bhatnagar, Sumit Gibbs, John P. Nijsen, Marjoleen Ray, Avijit Stoll, Brian Thompson, R. Adam Gulati, Abhishek Soukharev, Serguei Yamada, Akihiro Weddell, Jared Sayama, Hiroyuki Oishi, Masayo Wittemer‐Rump, Sabine Patel, Chirag Niederalt, Christoph Burghaus, Rolf Scheerans, Christian Lippert, Jörg Kabilan, Senthil Kareva, Irina Belousova, Natalya Rolfe, Alex Zutshi, Anup Chenel, Marylore Venezia, Filippo Fouliard, Sylvain Oberwittler, Heike Scholer‐Dahirel, Alix Lelievre, Helene Bottino, Dean Collins, Sabrina C. Nguyen, Hoa Q. Wang, Haiqing Yoneyama, Tomoki Zhu, Andy Z.X. van der Graaf, Piet H. Kierzek, Andrzej M. Clin Pharmacol Ther Reviews Drug development in oncology commonly exploits the tools of molecular biology to gain therapeutic benefit through reprograming of cellular responses. In immuno‐oncology (IO) the aim is to direct the patient’s own immune system to fight cancer. After remarkable successes of antibodies targeting PD1/PD‐L1 and CTLA4 receptors in targeted patient populations, the focus of further development has shifted toward combination therapies. However, the current drug‐development approach of exploiting a vast number of possible combination targets and dosing regimens has proven to be challenging and is arguably inefficient. In particular, the unprecedented number of clinical trials testing different combinations may no longer be sustainable by the population of available patients. Further development in IO requires a step change in selection and validation of candidate therapies to decrease development attrition rate and limit the number of clinical trials. Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) proposes to tackle this challenge through mechanistic modeling and simulation. Compounds’ pharmacokinetics, target binding, and mechanisms of action as well as existing knowledge on the underlying tumor and immune system biology are described by quantitative, dynamic models aiming to predict clinical results for novel combinations. Here, we review the current QSP approaches, the legacy of mathematical models available to quantitative clinical pharmacologists describing interaction between tumor and immune system, and the recent development of IO QSP platform models. We argue that QSP and virtual patients can be integrated as a new tool in existing IO drug development approaches to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the search for novel combination therapies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-14 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7983940/ /pubmed/32686076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1987 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi Lazarou, Georgia Bhatnagar, Sumit Gibbs, John P. Nijsen, Marjoleen Ray, Avijit Stoll, Brian Thompson, R. Adam Gulati, Abhishek Soukharev, Serguei Yamada, Akihiro Weddell, Jared Sayama, Hiroyuki Oishi, Masayo Wittemer‐Rump, Sabine Patel, Chirag Niederalt, Christoph Burghaus, Rolf Scheerans, Christian Lippert, Jörg Kabilan, Senthil Kareva, Irina Belousova, Natalya Rolfe, Alex Zutshi, Anup Chenel, Marylore Venezia, Filippo Fouliard, Sylvain Oberwittler, Heike Scholer‐Dahirel, Alix Lelievre, Helene Bottino, Dean Collins, Sabrina C. Nguyen, Hoa Q. Wang, Haiqing Yoneyama, Tomoki Zhu, Andy Z.X. van der Graaf, Piet H. Kierzek, Andrzej M. Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm |
title | Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm |
title_full | Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm |
title_short | Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno‐Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm |
title_sort | quantitative systems pharmacology approaches for immuno‐oncology: adding virtual patients to the development paradigm |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7983940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32686076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1987 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chelliahvijayalakshmi quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT lazarougeorgia quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT bhatnagarsumit quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT gibbsjohnp quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT nijsenmarjoleen quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT rayavijit quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT stollbrian quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT thompsonradam quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT gulatiabhishek quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT soukharevserguei quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT yamadaakihiro quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT weddelljared quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT sayamahiroyuki quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT oishimasayo quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT wittemerrumpsabine quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT patelchirag quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT niederaltchristoph quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT burghausrolf quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT scheeranschristian quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT lippertjorg quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT kabilansenthil quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT karevairina quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT belousovanatalya quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT rolfealex quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT zutshianup quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT chenelmarylore quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT veneziafilippo quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT fouliardsylvain quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT oberwittlerheike quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT scholerdahirelalix quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT lelievrehelene quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT bottinodean quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT collinssabrinac quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT nguyenhoaq quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT wanghaiqing quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT yoneyamatomoki quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT zhuandyzx quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT vandergraafpieth quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm AT kierzekandrzejm quantitativesystemspharmacologyapproachesforimmunooncologyaddingvirtualpatientstothedevelopmentparadigm |