Cargando…

Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for high‐risk cN0M0 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and to evaluate the efficacy of NAC in patients with localised disease (≤cT2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zennami, Kenji, Sumitomo, Makoto, Takahara, Kiyoshi, Nukaya, Takuhisa, Takenaka, Masashi, Fukaya, Kosuke, Ichino, Manabu, Fukami, Naohiko, Sasaki, Hitomi, Kusaka, Mamoru, Shiroki, Ryoichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32896105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15230
_version_ 1783667990334537728
author Zennami, Kenji
Sumitomo, Makoto
Takahara, Kiyoshi
Nukaya, Takuhisa
Takenaka, Masashi
Fukaya, Kosuke
Ichino, Manabu
Fukami, Naohiko
Sasaki, Hitomi
Kusaka, Mamoru
Shiroki, Ryoichi
author_facet Zennami, Kenji
Sumitomo, Makoto
Takahara, Kiyoshi
Nukaya, Takuhisa
Takenaka, Masashi
Fukaya, Kosuke
Ichino, Manabu
Fukami, Naohiko
Sasaki, Hitomi
Kusaka, Mamoru
Shiroki, Ryoichi
author_sort Zennami, Kenji
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for high‐risk cN0M0 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and to evaluate the efficacy of NAC in patients with localised disease (≤cT2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients with high‐risk cN0M0 UTUC who received NAC followed by surgery, compared with a matched cohort who underwent initial surgery at Fujita Health University during 2005–2019. Baseline and tumour characteristics, overall survival (OS), cancer‐specific survival (CSS), and recurrence‐free survival (RFS) were compared between the cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS: There were 117 and 67 patients in the study group and the control group, respectively. Significantly higher pathological downstaging (pDS) and lower lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were observed in the study group than in the control group (48% vs 22%, P = 0.008 and 29% vs 46%, P = 0.045, respectively). The NAC group had significantly better 5‐year OS (79% vs 53%, P = 0.003), 5‐year CSS (84% vs 66%, P = 0.008), and 5‐year RFS (80% vs 61%, P = 0.001) than the control group. The OS benefit of NAC was observed even in patients with localised (≤cT2) disease (P = 0.019). Patients with LVI showed significantly worse CSS both in pathologically locally advanced (≥pT3) and in localised (≤pT2) tumours (P = 0.048 and P = 0.018, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified LVI, NAC, and pDS as independent predictors of OS. Male sex and post‐NAC LVI were identified as predictors of worse survival in patients who underwent NAC. CONCLUSIONS: Two cycles of NAC improved the survival of patients with high‐risk UTUC, even in patients with localised disease. Although two cycles of NAC appear to be effective in cN0M0 high‐risk UTUC including localised disease, additional larger sample size multicentre prospective studies comparing short‐course NAC regimens followed by surgery and surgery alone are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7984033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79840332021-03-24 Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma Zennami, Kenji Sumitomo, Makoto Takahara, Kiyoshi Nukaya, Takuhisa Takenaka, Masashi Fukaya, Kosuke Ichino, Manabu Fukami, Naohiko Sasaki, Hitomi Kusaka, Mamoru Shiroki, Ryoichi BJU Int Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for high‐risk cN0M0 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and to evaluate the efficacy of NAC in patients with localised disease (≤cT2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients with high‐risk cN0M0 UTUC who received NAC followed by surgery, compared with a matched cohort who underwent initial surgery at Fujita Health University during 2005–2019. Baseline and tumour characteristics, overall survival (OS), cancer‐specific survival (CSS), and recurrence‐free survival (RFS) were compared between the cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS: There were 117 and 67 patients in the study group and the control group, respectively. Significantly higher pathological downstaging (pDS) and lower lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were observed in the study group than in the control group (48% vs 22%, P = 0.008 and 29% vs 46%, P = 0.045, respectively). The NAC group had significantly better 5‐year OS (79% vs 53%, P = 0.003), 5‐year CSS (84% vs 66%, P = 0.008), and 5‐year RFS (80% vs 61%, P = 0.001) than the control group. The OS benefit of NAC was observed even in patients with localised (≤cT2) disease (P = 0.019). Patients with LVI showed significantly worse CSS both in pathologically locally advanced (≥pT3) and in localised (≤pT2) tumours (P = 0.048 and P = 0.018, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified LVI, NAC, and pDS as independent predictors of OS. Male sex and post‐NAC LVI were identified as predictors of worse survival in patients who underwent NAC. CONCLUSIONS: Two cycles of NAC improved the survival of patients with high‐risk UTUC, even in patients with localised disease. Although two cycles of NAC appear to be effective in cN0M0 high‐risk UTUC including localised disease, additional larger sample size multicentre prospective studies comparing short‐course NAC regimens followed by surgery and surgery alone are required. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-28 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7984033/ /pubmed/32896105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15230 Text en © 2020 The Authors BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zennami, Kenji
Sumitomo, Makoto
Takahara, Kiyoshi
Nukaya, Takuhisa
Takenaka, Masashi
Fukaya, Kosuke
Ichino, Manabu
Fukami, Naohiko
Sasaki, Hitomi
Kusaka, Mamoru
Shiroki, Ryoichi
Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
title Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
title_full Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
title_fullStr Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
title_short Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
title_sort two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32896105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15230
work_keys_str_mv AT zennamikenji twocyclesofneoadjuvantchemotherapyimprovessurvivalinpatientswithhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT sumitomomakoto twocyclesofneoadjuvantchemotherapyimprovessurvivalinpatientswithhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT takaharakiyoshi twocyclesofneoadjuvantchemotherapyimprovessurvivalinpatientswithhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT nukayatakuhisa twocyclesofneoadjuvantchemotherapyimprovessurvivalinpatientswithhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT takenakamasashi twocyclesofneoadjuvantchemotherapyimprovessurvivalinpatientswithhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT fukayakosuke twocyclesofneoadjuvantchemotherapyimprovessurvivalinpatientswithhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT ichinomanabu twocyclesofneoadjuvantchemotherapyimprovessurvivalinpatientswithhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT fukaminaohiko twocyclesofneoadjuvantchemotherapyimprovessurvivalinpatientswithhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT sasakihitomi twocyclesofneoadjuvantchemotherapyimprovessurvivalinpatientswithhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT kusakamamoru twocyclesofneoadjuvantchemotherapyimprovessurvivalinpatientswithhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT shirokiryoichi twocyclesofneoadjuvantchemotherapyimprovessurvivalinpatientswithhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinoma