Cargando…

Autograft diameter in ACL reconstruction: size does matter

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are commonly seen in orthopedic surgery practice. Although anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has come a long way, the causes of failure have yet to be fully understood. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alkhalaf, Fahad N.A., Hanna, Sager, Alkhaldi, Mohammed Saleh Hattab, Alenezi, Fares, Khaja, Aliaa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: EDP Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33749586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021018
_version_ 1783668014756921344
author Alkhalaf, Fahad N.A.
Hanna, Sager
Alkhaldi, Mohammed Saleh Hattab
Alenezi, Fares
Khaja, Aliaa
author_facet Alkhalaf, Fahad N.A.
Hanna, Sager
Alkhaldi, Mohammed Saleh Hattab
Alenezi, Fares
Khaja, Aliaa
author_sort Alkhalaf, Fahad N.A.
collection PubMed
description Background: Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are commonly seen in orthopedic surgery practice. Although anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has come a long way, the causes of failure have yet to be fully understood. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not the intraoperative 4-strand hamstring autograft diameter does in fact influence the failure rates of ACLR. Methods: Retrospective intraoperative data were collected from ACLR patients from the only tertiary center available in Kuwait. Patients who underwent ACLR from 2012 to 2018 for isolated ACL injuries were included in this study, allowing for a 24 month follow-up period The cohorts were categorized into 3 groups: patients with graft size≤8mm, 2, patients with graft sizes≥8mm with 4-strands and patients with graft sizes≥8mm with 4-strands or more. ANOVA analysis was applied to address group differences between mean graft size and strand numbers and subsequently the failure rates for each group. In addition, the Mann–Whitney U test was used to investigate the relationship between revision and initial ACL graft size. Results: Out of the 711 out of 782 patients were included in this study. Only 42.6% of the patients did not need more than 4-strands to achieve an 8mm sized autograft. The patients who had autografts≤8mm in this study accounted for 17.1% of the population. About 7.2% of these patients required revision surgery. Patients with a 4-strand autograft size that was less than 8mm were 7.2 times more at risk for ACLR failure (RR=7.2, 95% CI: 6.02; 8.35, p=0.007). Conclusions: There is a significant correlation between 4-strand autograft diameter size and the need for ACLR revision surgery. Level of evidence: IV case series
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7984146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79841462021-03-25 Autograft diameter in ACL reconstruction: size does matter Alkhalaf, Fahad N.A. Hanna, Sager Alkhaldi, Mohammed Saleh Hattab Alenezi, Fares Khaja, Aliaa SICOT J Original Article Background: Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are commonly seen in orthopedic surgery practice. Although anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has come a long way, the causes of failure have yet to be fully understood. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not the intraoperative 4-strand hamstring autograft diameter does in fact influence the failure rates of ACLR. Methods: Retrospective intraoperative data were collected from ACLR patients from the only tertiary center available in Kuwait. Patients who underwent ACLR from 2012 to 2018 for isolated ACL injuries were included in this study, allowing for a 24 month follow-up period The cohorts were categorized into 3 groups: patients with graft size≤8mm, 2, patients with graft sizes≥8mm with 4-strands and patients with graft sizes≥8mm with 4-strands or more. ANOVA analysis was applied to address group differences between mean graft size and strand numbers and subsequently the failure rates for each group. In addition, the Mann–Whitney U test was used to investigate the relationship between revision and initial ACL graft size. Results: Out of the 711 out of 782 patients were included in this study. Only 42.6% of the patients did not need more than 4-strands to achieve an 8mm sized autograft. The patients who had autografts≤8mm in this study accounted for 17.1% of the population. About 7.2% of these patients required revision surgery. Patients with a 4-strand autograft size that was less than 8mm were 7.2 times more at risk for ACLR failure (RR=7.2, 95% CI: 6.02; 8.35, p=0.007). Conclusions: There is a significant correlation between 4-strand autograft diameter size and the need for ACLR revision surgery. Level of evidence: IV case series EDP Sciences 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7984146/ /pubmed/33749586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021018 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alkhalaf, Fahad N.A.
Hanna, Sager
Alkhaldi, Mohammed Saleh Hattab
Alenezi, Fares
Khaja, Aliaa
Autograft diameter in ACL reconstruction: size does matter
title Autograft diameter in ACL reconstruction: size does matter
title_full Autograft diameter in ACL reconstruction: size does matter
title_fullStr Autograft diameter in ACL reconstruction: size does matter
title_full_unstemmed Autograft diameter in ACL reconstruction: size does matter
title_short Autograft diameter in ACL reconstruction: size does matter
title_sort autograft diameter in acl reconstruction: size does matter
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33749586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021018
work_keys_str_mv AT alkhalaffahadna autograftdiameterinaclreconstructionsizedoesmatter
AT hannasager autograftdiameterinaclreconstructionsizedoesmatter
AT alkhaldimohammedsalehhattab autograftdiameterinaclreconstructionsizedoesmatter
AT alenezifares autograftdiameterinaclreconstructionsizedoesmatter
AT khajaaliaa autograftdiameterinaclreconstructionsizedoesmatter