Cargando…
Dual mobility for total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: A systematic review and metanalysis
Introduction: Revision THA (R-THA) is thought to have a higher complication rate if compared to primary THA. Dual Mobility (DM) implants have been designed aiming for achieving greater stability, with good clinical results. However, scarce material can be found about the real improvements provided b...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
EDP Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33749588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021015 |
_version_ | 1783668015694348288 |
---|---|
author | Giacomo, Placella Giulia, Bettinelli Valerio, Pace Vincenzo, Salini Pierluigi, Antinolfi |
author_facet | Giacomo, Placella Giulia, Bettinelli Valerio, Pace Vincenzo, Salini Pierluigi, Antinolfi |
author_sort | Giacomo, Placella |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Revision THA (R-THA) is thought to have a higher complication rate if compared to primary THA. Dual Mobility (DM) implants have been designed aiming for achieving greater stability, with good clinical results. However, scarce material can be found about the real improvements provided by this type of implant compared to traditional implant in Revisions of Total Hip Arthroplasties. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies were performed in December 2019. This was in accordance with the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Our primary outcome measure was overall survivorship and dislocation rate, either treated with a conservative method or requiring surgery. Results: Regarding the overall implant survival, we found a slight significant risk ratio, with a statistically meaningful difference between the two groups in questions in favour of the DM implant. A statistically significant difference in favour of the DM group turned out considering only the Dislocation rate Risk ratio and the aseptic loosening risk as well. No statistical difference was found between the two groups about the risk ratio of infection. Discussion: A steady increase of evidence is demonstrating the efficacy of using a DM cup system in THA revisions with low dislocation rates, but currently there is no study in the literature that demonstrates with statistically significant evidence. The main finding of the present study is that implant’s Survivor and prevention of dislocation at medium follow-up showed better results with a DM if compared to a fixed-bearing cup, for Revision THA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7984151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | EDP Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79841512021-03-25 Dual mobility for total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: A systematic review and metanalysis Giacomo, Placella Giulia, Bettinelli Valerio, Pace Vincenzo, Salini Pierluigi, Antinolfi SICOT J Review Article Introduction: Revision THA (R-THA) is thought to have a higher complication rate if compared to primary THA. Dual Mobility (DM) implants have been designed aiming for achieving greater stability, with good clinical results. However, scarce material can be found about the real improvements provided by this type of implant compared to traditional implant in Revisions of Total Hip Arthroplasties. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies were performed in December 2019. This was in accordance with the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Our primary outcome measure was overall survivorship and dislocation rate, either treated with a conservative method or requiring surgery. Results: Regarding the overall implant survival, we found a slight significant risk ratio, with a statistically meaningful difference between the two groups in questions in favour of the DM implant. A statistically significant difference in favour of the DM group turned out considering only the Dislocation rate Risk ratio and the aseptic loosening risk as well. No statistical difference was found between the two groups about the risk ratio of infection. Discussion: A steady increase of evidence is demonstrating the efficacy of using a DM cup system in THA revisions with low dislocation rates, but currently there is no study in the literature that demonstrates with statistically significant evidence. The main finding of the present study is that implant’s Survivor and prevention of dislocation at medium follow-up showed better results with a DM if compared to a fixed-bearing cup, for Revision THA. EDP Sciences 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7984151/ /pubmed/33749588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021015 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Giacomo, Placella Giulia, Bettinelli Valerio, Pace Vincenzo, Salini Pierluigi, Antinolfi Dual mobility for total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: A systematic review and metanalysis |
title | Dual mobility for total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: A systematic review and metanalysis |
title_full | Dual mobility for total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: A systematic review and metanalysis |
title_fullStr | Dual mobility for total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: A systematic review and metanalysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Dual mobility for total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: A systematic review and metanalysis |
title_short | Dual mobility for total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: A systematic review and metanalysis |
title_sort | dual mobility for total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: a systematic review and metanalysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33749588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giacomoplacella dualmobilityfortotalhiparthroplastyrevisionsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT giuliabettinelli dualmobilityfortotalhiparthroplastyrevisionsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT valeriopace dualmobilityfortotalhiparthroplastyrevisionsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT vincenzosalini dualmobilityfortotalhiparthroplastyrevisionsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT pierluigiantinolfi dualmobilityfortotalhiparthroplastyrevisionsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetanalysis |