Cargando…
A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking
PURPOSE: Respiratory motion of patients during positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging affects both image quality and quantitative accuracy. Hardware‐based motion estimation, which is the current clinical standard, requires initial setup, maintenance, and calibration of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33226647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14613 |
_version_ | 1783668019463979008 |
---|---|
author | Tumpa, Tasmia Rahman Acuff, Shelley N. Gregor, Jens Lee, Sanghyeb Hu, Dongming Osborne, Dustin R. |
author_facet | Tumpa, Tasmia Rahman Acuff, Shelley N. Gregor, Jens Lee, Sanghyeb Hu, Dongming Osborne, Dustin R. |
author_sort | Tumpa, Tasmia Rahman |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Respiratory motion of patients during positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging affects both image quality and quantitative accuracy. Hardware‐based motion estimation, which is the current clinical standard, requires initial setup, maintenance, and calibration of the equipment, and can be associated with patient discomfort. Data‐driven techniques are an active area of research with limited exploration into lesion‐specific motion estimation. This paper introduces a time‐of‐flight (TOF)‐weighted positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) algorithm that facilitates lesion‐specific respiratory motion estimation from raw listmode PET data. METHODS: The TOF‐PEPT algorithm was implemented and investigated under different scenarios: (a) a phantom study with a point source and an Anzai band for respiratory motion tracking; (b) a phantom study with a point source only, no Anzai band; (c) two clinical studies with point sources and the Anzai band; (d) two clinical studies with point sources only, no Anzai band; and (e) two clinical studies using lesions/internal regions instead of point sources and no Anzai band. For studies with radioactive point sources, they were placed on patients during PET/CT imaging. The motion tracking was performed using a preselected region of interest (ROI), manually drawn around point sources or lesions on reconstructed images. The extracted motion signals were compared with the Anzai band when applicable. For the purposes of additional comparison, a center‐of‐mass (COM) algorithm was implemented both with and without the use of TOF information. Using the motion estimate from each method, amplitude‐based gating was applied, and gated images were reconstructed. RESULTS: The TOF‐PEPT algorithm is shown to successfully determine the respiratory motion for both phantom and clinical studies. The derived motion signals correlated well with the Anzai band; correlation coefficients of 0.99 and 0.94‐0.97 were obtained for the phantom study and the clinical studies, respectively. TOF‐PEPT was found to be 13–38% better correlated with the Anzai results than the COM methods. Maximum Standardized Uptake Values (SUVs) were used to quantitatively compare the reconstructed‐gated images. In comparison with the ungated image, a 14–39% increase in the max SUV across several lesion areas and an 8.7% increase in the max SUV on the tracked lesion area were observed in the gated images based on TOF‐PEPT. The distinct presence of lesions with reduced blurring effect and generally sharper images were readily apparent in all clinical studies. In addition, max SUVs were found to be 4–10% higher in the TOF‐PEPT‐based gated images than in those based on Anzai and COM methods. CONCLUSION: A PEPT‐ based algorithm has been presented for determining movement due to respiratory motion during PET/CT imaging. Gating based on the motion estimate is shown to quantifiably improve the image quality in both a controlled point source phantom study and in clinical data patient studies. The algorithm has the potential to facilitate true motion correction where the reconstruction algorithm can use all data available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7984169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79841692021-03-24 A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking Tumpa, Tasmia Rahman Acuff, Shelley N. Gregor, Jens Lee, Sanghyeb Hu, Dongming Osborne, Dustin R. Med Phys QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING PURPOSE: Respiratory motion of patients during positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging affects both image quality and quantitative accuracy. Hardware‐based motion estimation, which is the current clinical standard, requires initial setup, maintenance, and calibration of the equipment, and can be associated with patient discomfort. Data‐driven techniques are an active area of research with limited exploration into lesion‐specific motion estimation. This paper introduces a time‐of‐flight (TOF)‐weighted positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) algorithm that facilitates lesion‐specific respiratory motion estimation from raw listmode PET data. METHODS: The TOF‐PEPT algorithm was implemented and investigated under different scenarios: (a) a phantom study with a point source and an Anzai band for respiratory motion tracking; (b) a phantom study with a point source only, no Anzai band; (c) two clinical studies with point sources and the Anzai band; (d) two clinical studies with point sources only, no Anzai band; and (e) two clinical studies using lesions/internal regions instead of point sources and no Anzai band. For studies with radioactive point sources, they were placed on patients during PET/CT imaging. The motion tracking was performed using a preselected region of interest (ROI), manually drawn around point sources or lesions on reconstructed images. The extracted motion signals were compared with the Anzai band when applicable. For the purposes of additional comparison, a center‐of‐mass (COM) algorithm was implemented both with and without the use of TOF information. Using the motion estimate from each method, amplitude‐based gating was applied, and gated images were reconstructed. RESULTS: The TOF‐PEPT algorithm is shown to successfully determine the respiratory motion for both phantom and clinical studies. The derived motion signals correlated well with the Anzai band; correlation coefficients of 0.99 and 0.94‐0.97 were obtained for the phantom study and the clinical studies, respectively. TOF‐PEPT was found to be 13–38% better correlated with the Anzai results than the COM methods. Maximum Standardized Uptake Values (SUVs) were used to quantitatively compare the reconstructed‐gated images. In comparison with the ungated image, a 14–39% increase in the max SUV across several lesion areas and an 8.7% increase in the max SUV on the tracked lesion area were observed in the gated images based on TOF‐PEPT. The distinct presence of lesions with reduced blurring effect and generally sharper images were readily apparent in all clinical studies. In addition, max SUVs were found to be 4–10% higher in the TOF‐PEPT‐based gated images than in those based on Anzai and COM methods. CONCLUSION: A PEPT‐ based algorithm has been presented for determining movement due to respiratory motion during PET/CT imaging. Gating based on the motion estimate is shown to quantifiably improve the image quality in both a controlled point source phantom study and in clinical data patient studies. The algorithm has the potential to facilitate true motion correction where the reconstruction algorithm can use all data available. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-13 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7984169/ /pubmed/33226647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14613 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING Tumpa, Tasmia Rahman Acuff, Shelley N. Gregor, Jens Lee, Sanghyeb Hu, Dongming Osborne, Dustin R. A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking |
title | A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking |
title_full | A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking |
title_fullStr | A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking |
title_full_unstemmed | A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking |
title_short | A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking |
title_sort | data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for pet based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking |
topic | QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33226647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14613 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tumpatasmiarahman adatadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking AT acuffshelleyn adatadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking AT gregorjens adatadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking AT leesanghyeb adatadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking AT hudongming adatadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking AT osbornedustinr adatadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking AT tumpatasmiarahman datadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking AT acuffshelleyn datadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking AT gregorjens datadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking AT leesanghyeb datadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking AT hudongming datadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking AT osbornedustinr datadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking |