Cargando…

A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking

PURPOSE: Respiratory motion of patients during positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging affects both image quality and quantitative accuracy. Hardware‐based motion estimation, which is the current clinical standard, requires initial setup, maintenance, and calibration of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tumpa, Tasmia Rahman, Acuff, Shelley N., Gregor, Jens, Lee, Sanghyeb, Hu, Dongming, Osborne, Dustin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33226647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14613
_version_ 1783668019463979008
author Tumpa, Tasmia Rahman
Acuff, Shelley N.
Gregor, Jens
Lee, Sanghyeb
Hu, Dongming
Osborne, Dustin R.
author_facet Tumpa, Tasmia Rahman
Acuff, Shelley N.
Gregor, Jens
Lee, Sanghyeb
Hu, Dongming
Osborne, Dustin R.
author_sort Tumpa, Tasmia Rahman
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Respiratory motion of patients during positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging affects both image quality and quantitative accuracy. Hardware‐based motion estimation, which is the current clinical standard, requires initial setup, maintenance, and calibration of the equipment, and can be associated with patient discomfort. Data‐driven techniques are an active area of research with limited exploration into lesion‐specific motion estimation. This paper introduces a time‐of‐flight (TOF)‐weighted positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) algorithm that facilitates lesion‐specific respiratory motion estimation from raw listmode PET data. METHODS: The TOF‐PEPT algorithm was implemented and investigated under different scenarios: (a) a phantom study with a point source and an Anzai band for respiratory motion tracking; (b) a phantom study with a point source only, no Anzai band; (c) two clinical studies with point sources and the Anzai band; (d) two clinical studies with point sources only, no Anzai band; and (e) two clinical studies using lesions/internal regions instead of point sources and no Anzai band. For studies with radioactive point sources, they were placed on patients during PET/CT imaging. The motion tracking was performed using a preselected region of interest (ROI), manually drawn around point sources or lesions on reconstructed images. The extracted motion signals were compared with the Anzai band when applicable. For the purposes of additional comparison, a center‐of‐mass (COM) algorithm was implemented both with and without the use of TOF information. Using the motion estimate from each method, amplitude‐based gating was applied, and gated images were reconstructed. RESULTS: The TOF‐PEPT algorithm is shown to successfully determine the respiratory motion for both phantom and clinical studies. The derived motion signals correlated well with the Anzai band; correlation coefficients of 0.99 and 0.94‐0.97 were obtained for the phantom study and the clinical studies, respectively. TOF‐PEPT was found to be 13–38% better correlated with the Anzai results than the COM methods. Maximum Standardized Uptake Values (SUVs) were used to quantitatively compare the reconstructed‐gated images. In comparison with the ungated image, a 14–39% increase in the max SUV across several lesion areas and an 8.7% increase in the max SUV on the tracked lesion area were observed in the gated images based on TOF‐PEPT. The distinct presence of lesions with reduced blurring effect and generally sharper images were readily apparent in all clinical studies. In addition, max SUVs were found to be 4–10% higher in the TOF‐PEPT‐based gated images than in those based on Anzai and COM methods. CONCLUSION: A PEPT‐ based algorithm has been presented for determining movement due to respiratory motion during PET/CT imaging. Gating based on the motion estimate is shown to quantifiably improve the image quality in both a controlled point source phantom study and in clinical data patient studies. The algorithm has the potential to facilitate true motion correction where the reconstruction algorithm can use all data available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7984169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79841692021-03-24 A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking Tumpa, Tasmia Rahman Acuff, Shelley N. Gregor, Jens Lee, Sanghyeb Hu, Dongming Osborne, Dustin R. Med Phys QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING PURPOSE: Respiratory motion of patients during positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging affects both image quality and quantitative accuracy. Hardware‐based motion estimation, which is the current clinical standard, requires initial setup, maintenance, and calibration of the equipment, and can be associated with patient discomfort. Data‐driven techniques are an active area of research with limited exploration into lesion‐specific motion estimation. This paper introduces a time‐of‐flight (TOF)‐weighted positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) algorithm that facilitates lesion‐specific respiratory motion estimation from raw listmode PET data. METHODS: The TOF‐PEPT algorithm was implemented and investigated under different scenarios: (a) a phantom study with a point source and an Anzai band for respiratory motion tracking; (b) a phantom study with a point source only, no Anzai band; (c) two clinical studies with point sources and the Anzai band; (d) two clinical studies with point sources only, no Anzai band; and (e) two clinical studies using lesions/internal regions instead of point sources and no Anzai band. For studies with radioactive point sources, they were placed on patients during PET/CT imaging. The motion tracking was performed using a preselected region of interest (ROI), manually drawn around point sources or lesions on reconstructed images. The extracted motion signals were compared with the Anzai band when applicable. For the purposes of additional comparison, a center‐of‐mass (COM) algorithm was implemented both with and without the use of TOF information. Using the motion estimate from each method, amplitude‐based gating was applied, and gated images were reconstructed. RESULTS: The TOF‐PEPT algorithm is shown to successfully determine the respiratory motion for both phantom and clinical studies. The derived motion signals correlated well with the Anzai band; correlation coefficients of 0.99 and 0.94‐0.97 were obtained for the phantom study and the clinical studies, respectively. TOF‐PEPT was found to be 13–38% better correlated with the Anzai results than the COM methods. Maximum Standardized Uptake Values (SUVs) were used to quantitatively compare the reconstructed‐gated images. In comparison with the ungated image, a 14–39% increase in the max SUV across several lesion areas and an 8.7% increase in the max SUV on the tracked lesion area were observed in the gated images based on TOF‐PEPT. The distinct presence of lesions with reduced blurring effect and generally sharper images were readily apparent in all clinical studies. In addition, max SUVs were found to be 4–10% higher in the TOF‐PEPT‐based gated images than in those based on Anzai and COM methods. CONCLUSION: A PEPT‐ based algorithm has been presented for determining movement due to respiratory motion during PET/CT imaging. Gating based on the motion estimate is shown to quantifiably improve the image quality in both a controlled point source phantom study and in clinical data patient studies. The algorithm has the potential to facilitate true motion correction where the reconstruction algorithm can use all data available. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-13 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7984169/ /pubmed/33226647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14613 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING
Tumpa, Tasmia Rahman
Acuff, Shelley N.
Gregor, Jens
Lee, Sanghyeb
Hu, Dongming
Osborne, Dustin R.
A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking
title A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking
title_full A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking
title_fullStr A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking
title_full_unstemmed A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking
title_short A data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking
title_sort data‐driven respiratory motion estimation approach for pet based on time‐of‐flight weighted positron emission particle tracking
topic QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33226647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14613
work_keys_str_mv AT tumpatasmiarahman adatadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking
AT acuffshelleyn adatadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking
AT gregorjens adatadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking
AT leesanghyeb adatadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking
AT hudongming adatadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking
AT osbornedustinr adatadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking
AT tumpatasmiarahman datadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking
AT acuffshelleyn datadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking
AT gregorjens datadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking
AT leesanghyeb datadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking
AT hudongming datadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking
AT osbornedustinr datadrivenrespiratorymotionestimationapproachforpetbasedontimeofflightweightedpositronemissionparticletracking