Cargando…

Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments

PURPOSE: To develop a knowledge‐based planning (KBP) model that predicts dosimetric indices and facilitates planning in CyberKnife intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT). METHODS: Forty CyberKnife SRS/SRT plans were retrospectively used to build a linear KBP model which correl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Suhong, Xu, Huijun, Zhang, Yin, Zhang, Xin, Dyer, Michael A., Hirsch, Ariel E., Tam Truong, Minh, Zhen, Heming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33560592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13173
_version_ 1783668071533117440
author Yu, Suhong
Xu, Huijun
Zhang, Yin
Zhang, Xin
Dyer, Michael A.
Hirsch, Ariel E.
Tam Truong, Minh
Zhen, Heming
author_facet Yu, Suhong
Xu, Huijun
Zhang, Yin
Zhang, Xin
Dyer, Michael A.
Hirsch, Ariel E.
Tam Truong, Minh
Zhen, Heming
author_sort Yu, Suhong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop a knowledge‐based planning (KBP) model that predicts dosimetric indices and facilitates planning in CyberKnife intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT). METHODS: Forty CyberKnife SRS/SRT plans were retrospectively used to build a linear KBP model which correlated the equivalent radius of the PTV (r(eq_PTV)) and the equivalent radius of volume that receives a set of prescription dose (r(eq_Vi), where V(i) = V(10%), V(20%) … V(120%)). To evaluate the model’s predictability, a fourfold cross‐validation was performed for dosimetric indices such as gradient measure (GM) and brain V(50%). The accuracy of the prediction was quantified by the mean and the standard deviation of the difference between planned and predicted values, (i.e., ΔGM = GM(pred) − GM(clin) and fractional ΔV(50%) = (V(50%pred) − V(50%clin))/V(50%clin)) and a coefficient of determination, R(2). Then, the KBP model was incorporated into the planning for another 22 clinical cases. The training plans and the KBP test plans were compared in terms of the new conformity index (nCI) as well as the planning efficiency. RESULTS: Our KBP model showed desirable predictability. For the 40 training plans, the average prediction error from cross‐validation was only 0.36 ± 0.06 mm for ΔGM, and 0.12 ± 0.08 for ΔV(50%). The R(2) for the linear fit between r(eq_PTV) and r(eq_vi) was 0.985 ± 0.019 for isodose volumes ranging from V(10%) to V(120%); particularly, R(2) = 0.995 for V(50%) and R(2) = 0.997 for V(100%). Compared to the training plans, our KBP test plan nCI was improved from 1.31 ± 0.15 to 1.15 ± 0.08 (P < 0.0001). The efficient automatic generation of the optimization constraints by using our model requested no or little planner’s intervention. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a linear KBP based on PTV volumes that accurately predicts CyberKnife SRS/SRT planning dosimetric indices and greatly helps achieve superior plan quality and planning efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7984472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79844722021-03-25 Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments Yu, Suhong Xu, Huijun Zhang, Yin Zhang, Xin Dyer, Michael A. Hirsch, Ariel E. Tam Truong, Minh Zhen, Heming J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To develop a knowledge‐based planning (KBP) model that predicts dosimetric indices and facilitates planning in CyberKnife intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT). METHODS: Forty CyberKnife SRS/SRT plans were retrospectively used to build a linear KBP model which correlated the equivalent radius of the PTV (r(eq_PTV)) and the equivalent radius of volume that receives a set of prescription dose (r(eq_Vi), where V(i) = V(10%), V(20%) … V(120%)). To evaluate the model’s predictability, a fourfold cross‐validation was performed for dosimetric indices such as gradient measure (GM) and brain V(50%). The accuracy of the prediction was quantified by the mean and the standard deviation of the difference between planned and predicted values, (i.e., ΔGM = GM(pred) − GM(clin) and fractional ΔV(50%) = (V(50%pred) − V(50%clin))/V(50%clin)) and a coefficient of determination, R(2). Then, the KBP model was incorporated into the planning for another 22 clinical cases. The training plans and the KBP test plans were compared in terms of the new conformity index (nCI) as well as the planning efficiency. RESULTS: Our KBP model showed desirable predictability. For the 40 training plans, the average prediction error from cross‐validation was only 0.36 ± 0.06 mm for ΔGM, and 0.12 ± 0.08 for ΔV(50%). The R(2) for the linear fit between r(eq_PTV) and r(eq_vi) was 0.985 ± 0.019 for isodose volumes ranging from V(10%) to V(120%); particularly, R(2) = 0.995 for V(50%) and R(2) = 0.997 for V(100%). Compared to the training plans, our KBP test plan nCI was improved from 1.31 ± 0.15 to 1.15 ± 0.08 (P < 0.0001). The efficient automatic generation of the optimization constraints by using our model requested no or little planner’s intervention. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a linear KBP based on PTV volumes that accurately predicts CyberKnife SRS/SRT planning dosimetric indices and greatly helps achieve superior plan quality and planning efficiency. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7984472/ /pubmed/33560592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13173 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Yu, Suhong
Xu, Huijun
Zhang, Yin
Zhang, Xin
Dyer, Michael A.
Hirsch, Ariel E.
Tam Truong, Minh
Zhen, Heming
Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments
title Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments
title_full Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments
title_fullStr Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments
title_short Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments
title_sort knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33560592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13173
work_keys_str_mv AT yusuhong knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments
AT xuhuijun knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments
AT zhangyin knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments
AT zhangxin knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments
AT dyermichaela knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments
AT hirschariele knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments
AT tamtruongminh knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments
AT zhenheming knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments