Cargando…
Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments
PURPOSE: To develop a knowledge‐based planning (KBP) model that predicts dosimetric indices and facilitates planning in CyberKnife intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT). METHODS: Forty CyberKnife SRS/SRT plans were retrospectively used to build a linear KBP model which correl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33560592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13173 |
_version_ | 1783668071533117440 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Suhong Xu, Huijun Zhang, Yin Zhang, Xin Dyer, Michael A. Hirsch, Ariel E. Tam Truong, Minh Zhen, Heming |
author_facet | Yu, Suhong Xu, Huijun Zhang, Yin Zhang, Xin Dyer, Michael A. Hirsch, Ariel E. Tam Truong, Minh Zhen, Heming |
author_sort | Yu, Suhong |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To develop a knowledge‐based planning (KBP) model that predicts dosimetric indices and facilitates planning in CyberKnife intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT). METHODS: Forty CyberKnife SRS/SRT plans were retrospectively used to build a linear KBP model which correlated the equivalent radius of the PTV (r(eq_PTV)) and the equivalent radius of volume that receives a set of prescription dose (r(eq_Vi), where V(i) = V(10%), V(20%) … V(120%)). To evaluate the model’s predictability, a fourfold cross‐validation was performed for dosimetric indices such as gradient measure (GM) and brain V(50%). The accuracy of the prediction was quantified by the mean and the standard deviation of the difference between planned and predicted values, (i.e., ΔGM = GM(pred) − GM(clin) and fractional ΔV(50%) = (V(50%pred) − V(50%clin))/V(50%clin)) and a coefficient of determination, R(2). Then, the KBP model was incorporated into the planning for another 22 clinical cases. The training plans and the KBP test plans were compared in terms of the new conformity index (nCI) as well as the planning efficiency. RESULTS: Our KBP model showed desirable predictability. For the 40 training plans, the average prediction error from cross‐validation was only 0.36 ± 0.06 mm for ΔGM, and 0.12 ± 0.08 for ΔV(50%). The R(2) for the linear fit between r(eq_PTV) and r(eq_vi) was 0.985 ± 0.019 for isodose volumes ranging from V(10%) to V(120%); particularly, R(2) = 0.995 for V(50%) and R(2) = 0.997 for V(100%). Compared to the training plans, our KBP test plan nCI was improved from 1.31 ± 0.15 to 1.15 ± 0.08 (P < 0.0001). The efficient automatic generation of the optimization constraints by using our model requested no or little planner’s intervention. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a linear KBP based on PTV volumes that accurately predicts CyberKnife SRS/SRT planning dosimetric indices and greatly helps achieve superior plan quality and planning efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7984472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79844722021-03-25 Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments Yu, Suhong Xu, Huijun Zhang, Yin Zhang, Xin Dyer, Michael A. Hirsch, Ariel E. Tam Truong, Minh Zhen, Heming J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To develop a knowledge‐based planning (KBP) model that predicts dosimetric indices and facilitates planning in CyberKnife intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT). METHODS: Forty CyberKnife SRS/SRT plans were retrospectively used to build a linear KBP model which correlated the equivalent radius of the PTV (r(eq_PTV)) and the equivalent radius of volume that receives a set of prescription dose (r(eq_Vi), where V(i) = V(10%), V(20%) … V(120%)). To evaluate the model’s predictability, a fourfold cross‐validation was performed for dosimetric indices such as gradient measure (GM) and brain V(50%). The accuracy of the prediction was quantified by the mean and the standard deviation of the difference between planned and predicted values, (i.e., ΔGM = GM(pred) − GM(clin) and fractional ΔV(50%) = (V(50%pred) − V(50%clin))/V(50%clin)) and a coefficient of determination, R(2). Then, the KBP model was incorporated into the planning for another 22 clinical cases. The training plans and the KBP test plans were compared in terms of the new conformity index (nCI) as well as the planning efficiency. RESULTS: Our KBP model showed desirable predictability. For the 40 training plans, the average prediction error from cross‐validation was only 0.36 ± 0.06 mm for ΔGM, and 0.12 ± 0.08 for ΔV(50%). The R(2) for the linear fit between r(eq_PTV) and r(eq_vi) was 0.985 ± 0.019 for isodose volumes ranging from V(10%) to V(120%); particularly, R(2) = 0.995 for V(50%) and R(2) = 0.997 for V(100%). Compared to the training plans, our KBP test plan nCI was improved from 1.31 ± 0.15 to 1.15 ± 0.08 (P < 0.0001). The efficient automatic generation of the optimization constraints by using our model requested no or little planner’s intervention. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a linear KBP based on PTV volumes that accurately predicts CyberKnife SRS/SRT planning dosimetric indices and greatly helps achieve superior plan quality and planning efficiency. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7984472/ /pubmed/33560592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13173 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Yu, Suhong Xu, Huijun Zhang, Yin Zhang, Xin Dyer, Michael A. Hirsch, Ariel E. Tam Truong, Minh Zhen, Heming Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments |
title | Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments |
title_full | Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments |
title_fullStr | Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments |
title_full_unstemmed | Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments |
title_short | Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments |
title_sort | knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33560592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yusuhong knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments AT xuhuijun knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments AT zhangyin knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments AT zhangxin knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments AT dyermichaela knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments AT hirschariele knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments AT tamtruongminh knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments AT zhenheming knowledgebasedplanninginroboticintracranialstereotacticradiosurgerytreatments |