Cargando…

Largely reduced OAR doses, and planning and delivery times for challenging robotic SBRT cases, obtained with a novel optimizer

Recently, VOLO™ was introduced as a new optimizer for CyberKnife® planning. In this study, we investigated possibilities to improve treatment plans for MLC‐based prostate SBRT with enhanced peripheral zone dose while sparing the urethra, and central lung tumors, compared to existing Sequential Optim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giżyńska, Marta K., Rossi, Linda, den Toom, Wilhelm, Milder, Maaike T. W., de Vries, Kim C., Nuyttens, Joost, Heijmen, Ben J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33475227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13172
_version_ 1783668071995539456
author Giżyńska, Marta K.
Rossi, Linda
den Toom, Wilhelm
Milder, Maaike T. W.
de Vries, Kim C.
Nuyttens, Joost
Heijmen, Ben J. M.
author_facet Giżyńska, Marta K.
Rossi, Linda
den Toom, Wilhelm
Milder, Maaike T. W.
de Vries, Kim C.
Nuyttens, Joost
Heijmen, Ben J. M.
author_sort Giżyńska, Marta K.
collection PubMed
description Recently, VOLO™ was introduced as a new optimizer for CyberKnife® planning. In this study, we investigated possibilities to improve treatment plans for MLC‐based prostate SBRT with enhanced peripheral zone dose while sparing the urethra, and central lung tumors, compared to existing Sequential Optimization (SO). The primary focus was on reducing OAR doses. For 25 prostate and 25 lung patients treated with SO plans, replanning with VOLO™ was performed with the same planning constraints. For equal PTV coverage, almost all OAR plan parameters were improved with VOLO™. For prostate patients, mean rectum and bladder doses were reduced by 34.2% (P < 0.001) and 23.5% (P < 0.001), with reductions in D(0.03cc) of 3.9%, 11.0% and 3.1% for rectum, mucosa and bladder (all P ≤ 0.01). Urethra D(5%) and D(10%) were 3.8% and 3.0% lower (P ≤ 0.002). For lung patients, esophagus, main bronchus, trachea, and spinal cord D(0.03cc) was reduced by 18.9%, 11.1%, 16.1%, and 13.2%, respectively (all P ≤ 0.01). Apart from the dosimetric advantages of VOLO™ planning, average reductions in MU, numbers of beams and nodes for prostate/lung were 48.7/32.8%, 26.5/7.9% and 13.4/7.9%, respectively (P ≤ 0.003). VOLO™ also resulted in reduced delivery times with mean/max reductions of: 27/43% (prostate) and 15/41% (lung), P  < 0.001. Planning times reduced from 6 h to 1.1 h and from 3 h to 1.7 h for prostate and lung, respectively. The new VOLO™ planning was highly superior to SO planning in terms of dosimetric plan quality, and planning and delivery times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7984474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79844742021-03-25 Largely reduced OAR doses, and planning and delivery times for challenging robotic SBRT cases, obtained with a novel optimizer Giżyńska, Marta K. Rossi, Linda den Toom, Wilhelm Milder, Maaike T. W. de Vries, Kim C. Nuyttens, Joost Heijmen, Ben J. M. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Recently, VOLO™ was introduced as a new optimizer for CyberKnife® planning. In this study, we investigated possibilities to improve treatment plans for MLC‐based prostate SBRT with enhanced peripheral zone dose while sparing the urethra, and central lung tumors, compared to existing Sequential Optimization (SO). The primary focus was on reducing OAR doses. For 25 prostate and 25 lung patients treated with SO plans, replanning with VOLO™ was performed with the same planning constraints. For equal PTV coverage, almost all OAR plan parameters were improved with VOLO™. For prostate patients, mean rectum and bladder doses were reduced by 34.2% (P < 0.001) and 23.5% (P < 0.001), with reductions in D(0.03cc) of 3.9%, 11.0% and 3.1% for rectum, mucosa and bladder (all P ≤ 0.01). Urethra D(5%) and D(10%) were 3.8% and 3.0% lower (P ≤ 0.002). For lung patients, esophagus, main bronchus, trachea, and spinal cord D(0.03cc) was reduced by 18.9%, 11.1%, 16.1%, and 13.2%, respectively (all P ≤ 0.01). Apart from the dosimetric advantages of VOLO™ planning, average reductions in MU, numbers of beams and nodes for prostate/lung were 48.7/32.8%, 26.5/7.9% and 13.4/7.9%, respectively (P ≤ 0.003). VOLO™ also resulted in reduced delivery times with mean/max reductions of: 27/43% (prostate) and 15/41% (lung), P  < 0.001. Planning times reduced from 6 h to 1.1 h and from 3 h to 1.7 h for prostate and lung, respectively. The new VOLO™ planning was highly superior to SO planning in terms of dosimetric plan quality, and planning and delivery times. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7984474/ /pubmed/33475227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13172 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Giżyńska, Marta K.
Rossi, Linda
den Toom, Wilhelm
Milder, Maaike T. W.
de Vries, Kim C.
Nuyttens, Joost
Heijmen, Ben J. M.
Largely reduced OAR doses, and planning and delivery times for challenging robotic SBRT cases, obtained with a novel optimizer
title Largely reduced OAR doses, and planning and delivery times for challenging robotic SBRT cases, obtained with a novel optimizer
title_full Largely reduced OAR doses, and planning and delivery times for challenging robotic SBRT cases, obtained with a novel optimizer
title_fullStr Largely reduced OAR doses, and planning and delivery times for challenging robotic SBRT cases, obtained with a novel optimizer
title_full_unstemmed Largely reduced OAR doses, and planning and delivery times for challenging robotic SBRT cases, obtained with a novel optimizer
title_short Largely reduced OAR doses, and planning and delivery times for challenging robotic SBRT cases, obtained with a novel optimizer
title_sort largely reduced oar doses, and planning and delivery times for challenging robotic sbrt cases, obtained with a novel optimizer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33475227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13172
work_keys_str_mv AT gizynskamartak largelyreducedoardosesandplanninganddeliverytimesforchallengingroboticsbrtcasesobtainedwithanoveloptimizer
AT rossilinda largelyreducedoardosesandplanninganddeliverytimesforchallengingroboticsbrtcasesobtainedwithanoveloptimizer
AT dentoomwilhelm largelyreducedoardosesandplanninganddeliverytimesforchallengingroboticsbrtcasesobtainedwithanoveloptimizer
AT mildermaaiketw largelyreducedoardosesandplanninganddeliverytimesforchallengingroboticsbrtcasesobtainedwithanoveloptimizer
AT devrieskimc largelyreducedoardosesandplanninganddeliverytimesforchallengingroboticsbrtcasesobtainedwithanoveloptimizer
AT nuyttensjoost largelyreducedoardosesandplanninganddeliverytimesforchallengingroboticsbrtcasesobtainedwithanoveloptimizer
AT heijmenbenjm largelyreducedoardosesandplanninganddeliverytimesforchallengingroboticsbrtcasesobtainedwithanoveloptimizer