Cargando…
Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography?
PURPOSE: This study aims to provide a detailed investigation on the noise penalization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL)‐based algorithm, with the utilization of partial volume effect correction (PVC), so as to offer the suitable beta value and optimum standardized uptake value (SUV) par...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33683004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13129 |
_version_ | 1783668073260122112 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Zhifang Guo, Binwei Huang, Bin Zhao, Bin Qin, Zhixing Hao, Xinzhong Liang, Meng Xie, Jun Li, Sijin |
author_facet | Wu, Zhifang Guo, Binwei Huang, Bin Zhao, Bin Qin, Zhixing Hao, Xinzhong Liang, Meng Xie, Jun Li, Sijin |
author_sort | Wu, Zhifang |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aims to provide a detailed investigation on the noise penalization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL)‐based algorithm, with the utilization of partial volume effect correction (PVC), so as to offer the suitable beta value and optimum standardized uptake value (SUV) parameters in clinical practice for small pulmonary nodules. METHODS: A National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) image‐quality phantom was scanned and images were reconstructed using BPL with beta values ranged from 100 to 1000. The recovery coefficient (RC), contrast recovery (CR), and background variability (BV) were measured to assess the quantification accuracy and image quality. In the clinical assessment, lesions were categorized into sub‐centimeter (<10 mm, n = 7) group and medium size (10–30 mm, n = 16) group. Signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) were measured to evaluate the image quality and lesion detectability. With PVC was performed, the impact of beta values on SUVs (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak) of small pulmonary nodules was evaluated. Subjective image analysis was performed by two experienced readers. RESULTS: With the increasing of beta values, RC, CR, and BV decreased gradually in the phantom work. In the clinical study, SNR and CNR of both groups increased with the beta values (P < 0.001), although the sub‐centimeter group showed increases after the beta value reached over 700. In addition, highly significant negative correlations were observed between SUVs and beta values for both lesion‐size groups before the PVC (P < 0.001 for all). After the PVC, SUVpeak measured from the sub‐centimeter group was no significantly different among different beta values (P = 0.830). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests using SUVpeak as the quantification parameter with PVC performed to mitigate the effects of beta regularization. Beta values between 300 and 400 were preferred for pulmonary nodules smaller than 30 mm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7984479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79844792021-03-25 Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography? Wu, Zhifang Guo, Binwei Huang, Bin Zhao, Bin Qin, Zhixing Hao, Xinzhong Liang, Meng Xie, Jun Li, Sijin J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging PURPOSE: This study aims to provide a detailed investigation on the noise penalization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL)‐based algorithm, with the utilization of partial volume effect correction (PVC), so as to offer the suitable beta value and optimum standardized uptake value (SUV) parameters in clinical practice for small pulmonary nodules. METHODS: A National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) image‐quality phantom was scanned and images were reconstructed using BPL with beta values ranged from 100 to 1000. The recovery coefficient (RC), contrast recovery (CR), and background variability (BV) were measured to assess the quantification accuracy and image quality. In the clinical assessment, lesions were categorized into sub‐centimeter (<10 mm, n = 7) group and medium size (10–30 mm, n = 16) group. Signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) were measured to evaluate the image quality and lesion detectability. With PVC was performed, the impact of beta values on SUVs (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak) of small pulmonary nodules was evaluated. Subjective image analysis was performed by two experienced readers. RESULTS: With the increasing of beta values, RC, CR, and BV decreased gradually in the phantom work. In the clinical study, SNR and CNR of both groups increased with the beta values (P < 0.001), although the sub‐centimeter group showed increases after the beta value reached over 700. In addition, highly significant negative correlations were observed between SUVs and beta values for both lesion‐size groups before the PVC (P < 0.001 for all). After the PVC, SUVpeak measured from the sub‐centimeter group was no significantly different among different beta values (P = 0.830). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests using SUVpeak as the quantification parameter with PVC performed to mitigate the effects of beta regularization. Beta values between 300 and 400 were preferred for pulmonary nodules smaller than 30 mm. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7984479/ /pubmed/33683004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13129 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Wu, Zhifang Guo, Binwei Huang, Bin Zhao, Bin Qin, Zhixing Hao, Xinzhong Liang, Meng Xie, Jun Li, Sijin Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography? |
title | Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography? |
title_full | Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography? |
title_fullStr | Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography? |
title_short | Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography? |
title_sort | does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography? |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33683004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuzhifang doesthebetaregularizationparameterofbayesianpenalizedlikelihoodreconstructionalwaysaffectthequantificationaccuracyandimagequalityofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomography AT guobinwei doesthebetaregularizationparameterofbayesianpenalizedlikelihoodreconstructionalwaysaffectthequantificationaccuracyandimagequalityofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomography AT huangbin doesthebetaregularizationparameterofbayesianpenalizedlikelihoodreconstructionalwaysaffectthequantificationaccuracyandimagequalityofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomography AT zhaobin doesthebetaregularizationparameterofbayesianpenalizedlikelihoodreconstructionalwaysaffectthequantificationaccuracyandimagequalityofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomography AT qinzhixing doesthebetaregularizationparameterofbayesianpenalizedlikelihoodreconstructionalwaysaffectthequantificationaccuracyandimagequalityofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomography AT haoxinzhong doesthebetaregularizationparameterofbayesianpenalizedlikelihoodreconstructionalwaysaffectthequantificationaccuracyandimagequalityofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomography AT liangmeng doesthebetaregularizationparameterofbayesianpenalizedlikelihoodreconstructionalwaysaffectthequantificationaccuracyandimagequalityofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomography AT xiejun doesthebetaregularizationparameterofbayesianpenalizedlikelihoodreconstructionalwaysaffectthequantificationaccuracyandimagequalityofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomography AT lisijin doesthebetaregularizationparameterofbayesianpenalizedlikelihoodreconstructionalwaysaffectthequantificationaccuracyandimagequalityofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomography |