Cargando…

Radiation treatment planning study to investigate feasibility of delivering Immunotherapy in Combination with Ablative Radiosurgery to Ultra‐High DoSes (ICARUS)

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors improve survival in metastatic diseases for some cancers. Multisite SBRT with pembrolizumab (SBRT + Pembro) was shown to be safe with promising local control using biologically effective doses (BEDs) = 95–120 Gy. Increased BED may improve response rate; however,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rokni, Michelle B., Pointer, Kelli B., George, Jonathan, Luke, Jason J., Chmura, Steven J., Redler, Gage
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13204
_version_ 1783668073734078464
author Rokni, Michelle B.
Pointer, Kelli B.
George, Jonathan
Luke, Jason J.
Chmura, Steven J.
Redler, Gage
author_facet Rokni, Michelle B.
Pointer, Kelli B.
George, Jonathan
Luke, Jason J.
Chmura, Steven J.
Redler, Gage
author_sort Rokni, Michelle B.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors improve survival in metastatic diseases for some cancers. Multisite SBRT with pembrolizumab (SBRT + Pembro) was shown to be safe with promising local control using biologically effective doses (BEDs) = 95–120 Gy. Increased BED may improve response rate; however, SBRT doses are limited by surrounding organs at risk (OARs). The purpose of this work was to develop and validate methods for safe delivery of ultra‐high doses of radiation (BED(10) > 300) to be used in future clinical trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The radiation plans from 15 patients enrolled on a phase I trial of SBRT + pembro were reanalyzed. Metastatic disease sites included liver (8/15), inguinal region (1/15), pelvis (2/15), lung (1/15), abdomen (1/15), spleen (1/15), and groin (1/15). Gross tumor volumes (GTVs) ranged from 80 to 708 cc. Following the same methodology used in the Phase I trial on which these patients were treated, GTVs > 65 cc were contracted to a 65 cc subvolume (SubGTV) resulting in only a portion of the GTV receiving prescription dose. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) was used to plan treatments BED(10) = 360 Gy. Plans utilizing both 6FFF and 10FFF beams were compared to clinical plans delivering BED(10) = 112.50 Gy. The target primary goal was V100% > 95% with a secondary goal of V70% > 99% and OAR objectives per the trial. To demonstrate feasibility, plans were delivered to a diode array phantom and evaluated for fidelity using gamma analysis. RESULTS: All 30 plans met the secondary coverage goal and satisfied all OAR constraints. The primary goal was achieved in 12/15 of the 6FFF plans and 13/15 of the 10FFF plans. Average gamma analysis passing rate using criteria of 3% dose difference and 3, 2, and 1 mm were 99.1  [Formula: see text]  1.0%, 98.5  [Formula: see text]  1.6%, and 95.1  [Formula: see text]  3.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Novel VMAT planning approaches with clinical treatment planning software and linear accelerators prove capable of delivering radiation doses in excess of 360 Gy BED(10) to tumor subvolumes, while maintaining safe OAR doses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7984482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79844822021-03-25 Radiation treatment planning study to investigate feasibility of delivering Immunotherapy in Combination with Ablative Radiosurgery to Ultra‐High DoSes (ICARUS) Rokni, Michelle B. Pointer, Kelli B. George, Jonathan Luke, Jason J. Chmura, Steven J. Redler, Gage J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors improve survival in metastatic diseases for some cancers. Multisite SBRT with pembrolizumab (SBRT + Pembro) was shown to be safe with promising local control using biologically effective doses (BEDs) = 95–120 Gy. Increased BED may improve response rate; however, SBRT doses are limited by surrounding organs at risk (OARs). The purpose of this work was to develop and validate methods for safe delivery of ultra‐high doses of radiation (BED(10) > 300) to be used in future clinical trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The radiation plans from 15 patients enrolled on a phase I trial of SBRT + pembro were reanalyzed. Metastatic disease sites included liver (8/15), inguinal region (1/15), pelvis (2/15), lung (1/15), abdomen (1/15), spleen (1/15), and groin (1/15). Gross tumor volumes (GTVs) ranged from 80 to 708 cc. Following the same methodology used in the Phase I trial on which these patients were treated, GTVs > 65 cc were contracted to a 65 cc subvolume (SubGTV) resulting in only a portion of the GTV receiving prescription dose. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) was used to plan treatments BED(10) = 360 Gy. Plans utilizing both 6FFF and 10FFF beams were compared to clinical plans delivering BED(10) = 112.50 Gy. The target primary goal was V100% > 95% with a secondary goal of V70% > 99% and OAR objectives per the trial. To demonstrate feasibility, plans were delivered to a diode array phantom and evaluated for fidelity using gamma analysis. RESULTS: All 30 plans met the secondary coverage goal and satisfied all OAR constraints. The primary goal was achieved in 12/15 of the 6FFF plans and 13/15 of the 10FFF plans. Average gamma analysis passing rate using criteria of 3% dose difference and 3, 2, and 1 mm were 99.1  [Formula: see text]  1.0%, 98.5  [Formula: see text]  1.6%, and 95.1  [Formula: see text]  3.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Novel VMAT planning approaches with clinical treatment planning software and linear accelerators prove capable of delivering radiation doses in excess of 360 Gy BED(10) to tumor subvolumes, while maintaining safe OAR doses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7984482/ /pubmed/33626240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13204 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Rokni, Michelle B.
Pointer, Kelli B.
George, Jonathan
Luke, Jason J.
Chmura, Steven J.
Redler, Gage
Radiation treatment planning study to investigate feasibility of delivering Immunotherapy in Combination with Ablative Radiosurgery to Ultra‐High DoSes (ICARUS)
title Radiation treatment planning study to investigate feasibility of delivering Immunotherapy in Combination with Ablative Radiosurgery to Ultra‐High DoSes (ICARUS)
title_full Radiation treatment planning study to investigate feasibility of delivering Immunotherapy in Combination with Ablative Radiosurgery to Ultra‐High DoSes (ICARUS)
title_fullStr Radiation treatment planning study to investigate feasibility of delivering Immunotherapy in Combination with Ablative Radiosurgery to Ultra‐High DoSes (ICARUS)
title_full_unstemmed Radiation treatment planning study to investigate feasibility of delivering Immunotherapy in Combination with Ablative Radiosurgery to Ultra‐High DoSes (ICARUS)
title_short Radiation treatment planning study to investigate feasibility of delivering Immunotherapy in Combination with Ablative Radiosurgery to Ultra‐High DoSes (ICARUS)
title_sort radiation treatment planning study to investigate feasibility of delivering immunotherapy in combination with ablative radiosurgery to ultra‐high doses (icarus)
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13204
work_keys_str_mv AT roknimichelleb radiationtreatmentplanningstudytoinvestigatefeasibilityofdeliveringimmunotherapyincombinationwithablativeradiosurgerytoultrahighdosesicarus
AT pointerkellib radiationtreatmentplanningstudytoinvestigatefeasibilityofdeliveringimmunotherapyincombinationwithablativeradiosurgerytoultrahighdosesicarus
AT georgejonathan radiationtreatmentplanningstudytoinvestigatefeasibilityofdeliveringimmunotherapyincombinationwithablativeradiosurgerytoultrahighdosesicarus
AT lukejasonj radiationtreatmentplanningstudytoinvestigatefeasibilityofdeliveringimmunotherapyincombinationwithablativeradiosurgerytoultrahighdosesicarus
AT chmurastevenj radiationtreatmentplanningstudytoinvestigatefeasibilityofdeliveringimmunotherapyincombinationwithablativeradiosurgerytoultrahighdosesicarus
AT redlergage radiationtreatmentplanningstudytoinvestigatefeasibilityofdeliveringimmunotherapyincombinationwithablativeradiosurgerytoultrahighdosesicarus