Cargando…

Nontarget emotional stimuli must be highly conspicuous to modulate the attentional blink

The attentional blink (AB) is often considered a top-down phenomenon because it is triggered by matching an initial target (T1) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream to a search template. However, the AB is modulated when targets are emotional, and is evoked when a task-irrelevant, emo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santacroce, Lindsay A., Carlos, Brandon J., Petro, Nathan, Tamber-Rosenau, Benjamin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33754297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02260-x
_version_ 1783668079699427328
author Santacroce, Lindsay A.
Carlos, Brandon J.
Petro, Nathan
Tamber-Rosenau, Benjamin J.
author_facet Santacroce, Lindsay A.
Carlos, Brandon J.
Petro, Nathan
Tamber-Rosenau, Benjamin J.
author_sort Santacroce, Lindsay A.
collection PubMed
description The attentional blink (AB) is often considered a top-down phenomenon because it is triggered by matching an initial target (T1) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream to a search template. However, the AB is modulated when targets are emotional, and is evoked when a task-irrelevant, emotional critical distractor (CDI) replaces T1. Neither manipulation fully captures the interplay between bottom-up and top-down attention in the AB: Valenced targets intrinsically conflate top-down and bottom-up attention. The CDI approach cannot manipulate second target (T2) valence, which is critical because valenced T2s can “break through” the AB (in the target-manipulation approach). The present research resolves this methodological challenge by indirectly measuring whether a purely bottom-up CDI can modulate report of a subsequent T2. This novel approach adds a valenced CDI to the “classic,” two-target AB. Participants viewed RSVP streams containing a T1–CDI pair preceding a variable lag to T2. If the CDI’s valence is sufficient to survive the AB, it should modulate T2 performance, indirectly signaling bottom-up capture by an emotional stimulus. Contrary to this prediction, CDI valence only affected the AB when CDIs were also extremely visually conspicuous. Thus, emotional valence alone is insufficient to modulate the AB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7984507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79845072021-03-23 Nontarget emotional stimuli must be highly conspicuous to modulate the attentional blink Santacroce, Lindsay A. Carlos, Brandon J. Petro, Nathan Tamber-Rosenau, Benjamin J. Atten Percept Psychophys Article The attentional blink (AB) is often considered a top-down phenomenon because it is triggered by matching an initial target (T1) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream to a search template. However, the AB is modulated when targets are emotional, and is evoked when a task-irrelevant, emotional critical distractor (CDI) replaces T1. Neither manipulation fully captures the interplay between bottom-up and top-down attention in the AB: Valenced targets intrinsically conflate top-down and bottom-up attention. The CDI approach cannot manipulate second target (T2) valence, which is critical because valenced T2s can “break through” the AB (in the target-manipulation approach). The present research resolves this methodological challenge by indirectly measuring whether a purely bottom-up CDI can modulate report of a subsequent T2. This novel approach adds a valenced CDI to the “classic,” two-target AB. Participants viewed RSVP streams containing a T1–CDI pair preceding a variable lag to T2. If the CDI’s valence is sufficient to survive the AB, it should modulate T2 performance, indirectly signaling bottom-up capture by an emotional stimulus. Contrary to this prediction, CDI valence only affected the AB when CDIs were also extremely visually conspicuous. Thus, emotional valence alone is insufficient to modulate the AB. Springer US 2021-03-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7984507/ /pubmed/33754297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02260-x Text en © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Santacroce, Lindsay A.
Carlos, Brandon J.
Petro, Nathan
Tamber-Rosenau, Benjamin J.
Nontarget emotional stimuli must be highly conspicuous to modulate the attentional blink
title Nontarget emotional stimuli must be highly conspicuous to modulate the attentional blink
title_full Nontarget emotional stimuli must be highly conspicuous to modulate the attentional blink
title_fullStr Nontarget emotional stimuli must be highly conspicuous to modulate the attentional blink
title_full_unstemmed Nontarget emotional stimuli must be highly conspicuous to modulate the attentional blink
title_short Nontarget emotional stimuli must be highly conspicuous to modulate the attentional blink
title_sort nontarget emotional stimuli must be highly conspicuous to modulate the attentional blink
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33754297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02260-x
work_keys_str_mv AT santacrocelindsaya nontargetemotionalstimulimustbehighlyconspicuoustomodulatetheattentionalblink
AT carlosbrandonj nontargetemotionalstimulimustbehighlyconspicuoustomodulatetheattentionalblink
AT petronathan nontargetemotionalstimulimustbehighlyconspicuoustomodulatetheattentionalblink
AT tamberrosenaubenjaminj nontargetemotionalstimulimustbehighlyconspicuoustomodulatetheattentionalblink