Cargando…

Recent Evolution in the Management of Lymph Node Metastases in Melanoma

INTRODUCTION: Based upon two large randomized international clinical trials (German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG-SLT) and Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-II)) published in 2016 and 2017, respectively, active surveillance has been demonstrated to have equivalent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breit, Shelby, Foley, Elise, Ablah, Elizabeth, Okut, Hayrettin, Mammen, Joshua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Kansas Medical Center 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33763181
http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol1414674
_version_ 1783668111304556544
author Breit, Shelby
Foley, Elise
Ablah, Elizabeth
Okut, Hayrettin
Mammen, Joshua
author_facet Breit, Shelby
Foley, Elise
Ablah, Elizabeth
Okut, Hayrettin
Mammen, Joshua
author_sort Breit, Shelby
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Based upon two large randomized international clinical trials (German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG-SLT) and Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-II)) published in 2016 and 2017, respectively, active surveillance has been demonstrated to have equivalent survival outcomes to completion lymphadenectomy (CLND) for a subset of patients who have microscopic lymph node disease. In this study, the changes in national practice patterns were examined regarding the utilization of CLND after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, CLND utilization was examined in SLN-positive patients diagnosed with melanoma between 2012 and 2016. A hierarchal logistical regression model with hospital-level random intercepts was constructed to examine the factors associated with SLNB followed by observation vs. SLNB with CLND. RESULTS: Of the 148,982 patients identified, 43% (n = 63,358) underwent SLNB and 10.3% (n = 6,551) had a SLNB with microscopic disease. CLND was performed for 57% (n = 2,817) of these patients. Patients were more likely to undergo CLND if they were ≤ 55 years of age (OR, 1.454; p ≤ 0.0001), ages 56 – 65 (OR, 1.127; p = 0.026), Charlson Deyo Score = 0 (OR, 2.088; p = 0.043), or were diagnosed with melanoma in 2012 (OR, 2.259, p ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of CLND among patients with microscopic nodal melanoma was significantly lower in 2016 compared to 2012. Younger age, lack of comorbidities, and primary tumor location on the trunk or head/neck were associated with higher utilization of CLND.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7984741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher University of Kansas Medical Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79847412021-03-23 Recent Evolution in the Management of Lymph Node Metastases in Melanoma Breit, Shelby Foley, Elise Ablah, Elizabeth Okut, Hayrettin Mammen, Joshua Kans J Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: Based upon two large randomized international clinical trials (German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG-SLT) and Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-II)) published in 2016 and 2017, respectively, active surveillance has been demonstrated to have equivalent survival outcomes to completion lymphadenectomy (CLND) for a subset of patients who have microscopic lymph node disease. In this study, the changes in national practice patterns were examined regarding the utilization of CLND after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, CLND utilization was examined in SLN-positive patients diagnosed with melanoma between 2012 and 2016. A hierarchal logistical regression model with hospital-level random intercepts was constructed to examine the factors associated with SLNB followed by observation vs. SLNB with CLND. RESULTS: Of the 148,982 patients identified, 43% (n = 63,358) underwent SLNB and 10.3% (n = 6,551) had a SLNB with microscopic disease. CLND was performed for 57% (n = 2,817) of these patients. Patients were more likely to undergo CLND if they were ≤ 55 years of age (OR, 1.454; p ≤ 0.0001), ages 56 – 65 (OR, 1.127; p = 0.026), Charlson Deyo Score = 0 (OR, 2.088; p = 0.043), or were diagnosed with melanoma in 2012 (OR, 2.259, p ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of CLND among patients with microscopic nodal melanoma was significantly lower in 2016 compared to 2012. Younger age, lack of comorbidities, and primary tumor location on the trunk or head/neck were associated with higher utilization of CLND. University of Kansas Medical Center 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7984741/ /pubmed/33763181 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol1414674 Text en © 2021 The University of Kansas Medical Center This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research
Breit, Shelby
Foley, Elise
Ablah, Elizabeth
Okut, Hayrettin
Mammen, Joshua
Recent Evolution in the Management of Lymph Node Metastases in Melanoma
title Recent Evolution in the Management of Lymph Node Metastases in Melanoma
title_full Recent Evolution in the Management of Lymph Node Metastases in Melanoma
title_fullStr Recent Evolution in the Management of Lymph Node Metastases in Melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Recent Evolution in the Management of Lymph Node Metastases in Melanoma
title_short Recent Evolution in the Management of Lymph Node Metastases in Melanoma
title_sort recent evolution in the management of lymph node metastases in melanoma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33763181
http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol1414674
work_keys_str_mv AT breitshelby recentevolutioninthemanagementoflymphnodemetastasesinmelanoma
AT foleyelise recentevolutioninthemanagementoflymphnodemetastasesinmelanoma
AT ablahelizabeth recentevolutioninthemanagementoflymphnodemetastasesinmelanoma
AT okuthayrettin recentevolutioninthemanagementoflymphnodemetastasesinmelanoma
AT mammenjoshua recentevolutioninthemanagementoflymphnodemetastasesinmelanoma