Cargando…

Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective

Airborne transmission is one of the routes for the spread of COVID-19 which is caused by inhalation of smaller droplets containing SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., either virus-laden particulate matter: PM and/or droplet nuclei) in an indoor environment. Notably, a significant fraction of the small droplets, along...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ram, Kirpa, Thakur, Roseline C., Singh, Dharmendra Kumar, Kawamura, Kimitaka, Shimouchi, Akito, Sekine, Yoshika, Nishimura, Hidekazu, Singh, Sunit K., Pavuluri, Chandra Mouli, Singh, R.S., Tripathi, S.N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33940729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145525
_version_ 1783668144256057344
author Ram, Kirpa
Thakur, Roseline C.
Singh, Dharmendra Kumar
Kawamura, Kimitaka
Shimouchi, Akito
Sekine, Yoshika
Nishimura, Hidekazu
Singh, Sunit K.
Pavuluri, Chandra Mouli
Singh, R.S.
Tripathi, S.N.
author_facet Ram, Kirpa
Thakur, Roseline C.
Singh, Dharmendra Kumar
Kawamura, Kimitaka
Shimouchi, Akito
Sekine, Yoshika
Nishimura, Hidekazu
Singh, Sunit K.
Pavuluri, Chandra Mouli
Singh, R.S.
Tripathi, S.N.
author_sort Ram, Kirpa
collection PubMed
description Airborne transmission is one of the routes for the spread of COVID-19 which is caused by inhalation of smaller droplets containing SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., either virus-laden particulate matter: PM and/or droplet nuclei) in an indoor environment. Notably, a significant fraction of the small droplets, along with respiratory droplets, is produced by both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals during expiratory events such as breathing, sneezing, coughing and speaking. When these small droplets are exposed to the ambient environment, they may interact with PM and may remain suspended in the atmosphere even for several hours. Therefore, it is important to know the fate of these droplets and processes (e.g., physical and chemical) in the atmosphere to better understand airborne transmission. Therefore, we reviewed existing literature focussed on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the spread of COVID-19 and present an environmental perspective on why airborne transmission hasn't been very conclusive so far. In addition, we discuss various environmental factors (e.g., temperature, humidity, etc.) and sampling difficulties, which affect the conclusions of the studies focussed on airborne transmission. One of the reasons for reduced emphasis on airborne transmission could be that the smaller droplets have less number of viruses as compared to larger droplets. Further, smaller droplets can evaporate faster, exposing SARS-CoV-2 within the small droplets to the environment, whose viability may further reduce. For example, these small droplets containing SARS-CoV-2 might also physically combine with or attach to pre-existing PM so that their behaviour and fate may be governed by PM composition. Thus, the measurement of their infectivity and viability is highly uncertain due to a lack of robust sampling system to separately collect virions in the atmosphere. We believe that the present review will help to minimize the gap in our understanding of the current pandemic and develop a robust epidemiological method for mortality assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7984961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79849612021-03-23 Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective Ram, Kirpa Thakur, Roseline C. Singh, Dharmendra Kumar Kawamura, Kimitaka Shimouchi, Akito Sekine, Yoshika Nishimura, Hidekazu Singh, Sunit K. Pavuluri, Chandra Mouli Singh, R.S. Tripathi, S.N. Sci Total Environ Review Airborne transmission is one of the routes for the spread of COVID-19 which is caused by inhalation of smaller droplets containing SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., either virus-laden particulate matter: PM and/or droplet nuclei) in an indoor environment. Notably, a significant fraction of the small droplets, along with respiratory droplets, is produced by both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals during expiratory events such as breathing, sneezing, coughing and speaking. When these small droplets are exposed to the ambient environment, they may interact with PM and may remain suspended in the atmosphere even for several hours. Therefore, it is important to know the fate of these droplets and processes (e.g., physical and chemical) in the atmosphere to better understand airborne transmission. Therefore, we reviewed existing literature focussed on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the spread of COVID-19 and present an environmental perspective on why airborne transmission hasn't been very conclusive so far. In addition, we discuss various environmental factors (e.g., temperature, humidity, etc.) and sampling difficulties, which affect the conclusions of the studies focussed on airborne transmission. One of the reasons for reduced emphasis on airborne transmission could be that the smaller droplets have less number of viruses as compared to larger droplets. Further, smaller droplets can evaporate faster, exposing SARS-CoV-2 within the small droplets to the environment, whose viability may further reduce. For example, these small droplets containing SARS-CoV-2 might also physically combine with or attach to pre-existing PM so that their behaviour and fate may be governed by PM composition. Thus, the measurement of their infectivity and viability is highly uncertain due to a lack of robust sampling system to separately collect virions in the atmosphere. We believe that the present review will help to minimize the gap in our understanding of the current pandemic and develop a robust epidemiological method for mortality assessment. Elsevier B.V. 2021-06-15 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7984961/ /pubmed/33940729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145525 Text en © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review
Ram, Kirpa
Thakur, Roseline C.
Singh, Dharmendra Kumar
Kawamura, Kimitaka
Shimouchi, Akito
Sekine, Yoshika
Nishimura, Hidekazu
Singh, Sunit K.
Pavuluri, Chandra Mouli
Singh, R.S.
Tripathi, S.N.
Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective
title Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective
title_full Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective
title_fullStr Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective
title_full_unstemmed Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective
title_short Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective
title_sort why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of covid-19? an atmospheric science perspective
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33940729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145525
work_keys_str_mv AT ramkirpa whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective
AT thakurroselinec whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective
AT singhdharmendrakumar whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective
AT kawamurakimitaka whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective
AT shimouchiakito whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective
AT sekineyoshika whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective
AT nishimurahidekazu whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective
AT singhsunitk whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective
AT pavulurichandramouli whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective
AT singhrs whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective
AT tripathisn whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective