Cargando…
Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective
Airborne transmission is one of the routes for the spread of COVID-19 which is caused by inhalation of smaller droplets containing SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., either virus-laden particulate matter: PM and/or droplet nuclei) in an indoor environment. Notably, a significant fraction of the small droplets, along...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33940729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145525 |
_version_ | 1783668144256057344 |
---|---|
author | Ram, Kirpa Thakur, Roseline C. Singh, Dharmendra Kumar Kawamura, Kimitaka Shimouchi, Akito Sekine, Yoshika Nishimura, Hidekazu Singh, Sunit K. Pavuluri, Chandra Mouli Singh, R.S. Tripathi, S.N. |
author_facet | Ram, Kirpa Thakur, Roseline C. Singh, Dharmendra Kumar Kawamura, Kimitaka Shimouchi, Akito Sekine, Yoshika Nishimura, Hidekazu Singh, Sunit K. Pavuluri, Chandra Mouli Singh, R.S. Tripathi, S.N. |
author_sort | Ram, Kirpa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Airborne transmission is one of the routes for the spread of COVID-19 which is caused by inhalation of smaller droplets containing SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., either virus-laden particulate matter: PM and/or droplet nuclei) in an indoor environment. Notably, a significant fraction of the small droplets, along with respiratory droplets, is produced by both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals during expiratory events such as breathing, sneezing, coughing and speaking. When these small droplets are exposed to the ambient environment, they may interact with PM and may remain suspended in the atmosphere even for several hours. Therefore, it is important to know the fate of these droplets and processes (e.g., physical and chemical) in the atmosphere to better understand airborne transmission. Therefore, we reviewed existing literature focussed on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the spread of COVID-19 and present an environmental perspective on why airborne transmission hasn't been very conclusive so far. In addition, we discuss various environmental factors (e.g., temperature, humidity, etc.) and sampling difficulties, which affect the conclusions of the studies focussed on airborne transmission. One of the reasons for reduced emphasis on airborne transmission could be that the smaller droplets have less number of viruses as compared to larger droplets. Further, smaller droplets can evaporate faster, exposing SARS-CoV-2 within the small droplets to the environment, whose viability may further reduce. For example, these small droplets containing SARS-CoV-2 might also physically combine with or attach to pre-existing PM so that their behaviour and fate may be governed by PM composition. Thus, the measurement of their infectivity and viability is highly uncertain due to a lack of robust sampling system to separately collect virions in the atmosphere. We believe that the present review will help to minimize the gap in our understanding of the current pandemic and develop a robust epidemiological method for mortality assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7984961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79849612021-03-23 Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective Ram, Kirpa Thakur, Roseline C. Singh, Dharmendra Kumar Kawamura, Kimitaka Shimouchi, Akito Sekine, Yoshika Nishimura, Hidekazu Singh, Sunit K. Pavuluri, Chandra Mouli Singh, R.S. Tripathi, S.N. Sci Total Environ Review Airborne transmission is one of the routes for the spread of COVID-19 which is caused by inhalation of smaller droplets containing SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., either virus-laden particulate matter: PM and/or droplet nuclei) in an indoor environment. Notably, a significant fraction of the small droplets, along with respiratory droplets, is produced by both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals during expiratory events such as breathing, sneezing, coughing and speaking. When these small droplets are exposed to the ambient environment, they may interact with PM and may remain suspended in the atmosphere even for several hours. Therefore, it is important to know the fate of these droplets and processes (e.g., physical and chemical) in the atmosphere to better understand airborne transmission. Therefore, we reviewed existing literature focussed on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the spread of COVID-19 and present an environmental perspective on why airborne transmission hasn't been very conclusive so far. In addition, we discuss various environmental factors (e.g., temperature, humidity, etc.) and sampling difficulties, which affect the conclusions of the studies focussed on airborne transmission. One of the reasons for reduced emphasis on airborne transmission could be that the smaller droplets have less number of viruses as compared to larger droplets. Further, smaller droplets can evaporate faster, exposing SARS-CoV-2 within the small droplets to the environment, whose viability may further reduce. For example, these small droplets containing SARS-CoV-2 might also physically combine with or attach to pre-existing PM so that their behaviour and fate may be governed by PM composition. Thus, the measurement of their infectivity and viability is highly uncertain due to a lack of robust sampling system to separately collect virions in the atmosphere. We believe that the present review will help to minimize the gap in our understanding of the current pandemic and develop a robust epidemiological method for mortality assessment. Elsevier B.V. 2021-06-15 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7984961/ /pubmed/33940729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145525 Text en © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Review Ram, Kirpa Thakur, Roseline C. Singh, Dharmendra Kumar Kawamura, Kimitaka Shimouchi, Akito Sekine, Yoshika Nishimura, Hidekazu Singh, Sunit K. Pavuluri, Chandra Mouli Singh, R.S. Tripathi, S.N. Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective |
title | Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective |
title_full | Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective |
title_fullStr | Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective |
title_short | Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective |
title_sort | why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of covid-19? an atmospheric science perspective |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33940729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145525 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramkirpa whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective AT thakurroselinec whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective AT singhdharmendrakumar whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective AT kawamurakimitaka whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective AT shimouchiakito whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective AT sekineyoshika whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective AT nishimurahidekazu whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective AT singhsunitk whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective AT pavulurichandramouli whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective AT singhrs whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective AT tripathisn whyairbornetransmissionhasntbeenconclusiveincaseofcovid19anatmosphericscienceperspective |