Cargando…

Latency Reversal 2.0: Giving the Immune System a Seat at the Table

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: For most people living with HIV (PLWH), treatment with effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) results in suppression of viremia below the limit of detection of clinical assays, immune reconstitution, reduced immune activation, avoidance of opportunistic infections, and progression...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Vidisha, Dashti, Amir, Mavigner, Maud, Chahroudi, Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00540-z
_version_ 1783668170801807360
author Singh, Vidisha
Dashti, Amir
Mavigner, Maud
Chahroudi, Ann
author_facet Singh, Vidisha
Dashti, Amir
Mavigner, Maud
Chahroudi, Ann
author_sort Singh, Vidisha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: For most people living with HIV (PLWH), treatment with effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) results in suppression of viremia below the limit of detection of clinical assays, immune reconstitution, reduced immune activation, avoidance of opportunistic infections, and progression to AIDS. However, ART alone is not curative, and HIV persists in a non-replicating, latent form. In this review, we provide a historical perspective on non-specific latency reversal approaches (LRA 1.0) and summarize recent advances in latency reversal strategies that target specific signaling pathways within CD4+ T cells or other immune cells to induce expression of latent HIV (immune-based latency reversal, or LRA 2.0). RECENT FINDINGS: The HIV reservoir is primarily composed of latently infected CD4+ T cells carrying integrated, replication-competent provirus that can give rise to rebound viremia if ART is stopped. Myeloid lineage cells also contribute to HIV latency in certain tissues; we focus here on CD4+ T cells as a sufficient body of evidence regarding latency reversal in myeloid cells is lacking. The immunomodulatory LRA 2.0 approaches we describe include pattern recognition receptor agonists, immune checkpoint inhibitors, non-canonical NF-kB stimulation, and transient CD8+ lymphocyte depletion, along with promising combination strategies. We highlight recent studies demonstrating robust latency reversal in nonhuman primate models. SUMMARY: While significant strides have been made in terms of virus reactivation from latency, initial hopes for latency reversal alone to result in a reduction of infected cells, through viral cytopathic effect or an unboosted immune system, have not been realized and it seems clear that even effective latency reversal strategies will need to be paired with an approach that facilitates immune recognition and clearance of cells containing reactivated virus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7985101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79851012021-04-12 Latency Reversal 2.0: Giving the Immune System a Seat at the Table Singh, Vidisha Dashti, Amir Mavigner, Maud Chahroudi, Ann Curr HIV/AIDS Rep HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment (AL Landay and NS Utay, Section Editors) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: For most people living with HIV (PLWH), treatment with effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) results in suppression of viremia below the limit of detection of clinical assays, immune reconstitution, reduced immune activation, avoidance of opportunistic infections, and progression to AIDS. However, ART alone is not curative, and HIV persists in a non-replicating, latent form. In this review, we provide a historical perspective on non-specific latency reversal approaches (LRA 1.0) and summarize recent advances in latency reversal strategies that target specific signaling pathways within CD4+ T cells or other immune cells to induce expression of latent HIV (immune-based latency reversal, or LRA 2.0). RECENT FINDINGS: The HIV reservoir is primarily composed of latently infected CD4+ T cells carrying integrated, replication-competent provirus that can give rise to rebound viremia if ART is stopped. Myeloid lineage cells also contribute to HIV latency in certain tissues; we focus here on CD4+ T cells as a sufficient body of evidence regarding latency reversal in myeloid cells is lacking. The immunomodulatory LRA 2.0 approaches we describe include pattern recognition receptor agonists, immune checkpoint inhibitors, non-canonical NF-kB stimulation, and transient CD8+ lymphocyte depletion, along with promising combination strategies. We highlight recent studies demonstrating robust latency reversal in nonhuman primate models. SUMMARY: While significant strides have been made in terms of virus reactivation from latency, initial hopes for latency reversal alone to result in a reduction of infected cells, through viral cytopathic effect or an unboosted immune system, have not been realized and it seems clear that even effective latency reversal strategies will need to be paired with an approach that facilitates immune recognition and clearance of cells containing reactivated virus. Springer US 2021-01-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7985101/ /pubmed/33433817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00540-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment (AL Landay and NS Utay, Section Editors)
Singh, Vidisha
Dashti, Amir
Mavigner, Maud
Chahroudi, Ann
Latency Reversal 2.0: Giving the Immune System a Seat at the Table
title Latency Reversal 2.0: Giving the Immune System a Seat at the Table
title_full Latency Reversal 2.0: Giving the Immune System a Seat at the Table
title_fullStr Latency Reversal 2.0: Giving the Immune System a Seat at the Table
title_full_unstemmed Latency Reversal 2.0: Giving the Immune System a Seat at the Table
title_short Latency Reversal 2.0: Giving the Immune System a Seat at the Table
title_sort latency reversal 2.0: giving the immune system a seat at the table
topic HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment (AL Landay and NS Utay, Section Editors)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00540-z
work_keys_str_mv AT singhvidisha latencyreversal20givingtheimmunesystemaseatatthetable
AT dashtiamir latencyreversal20givingtheimmunesystemaseatatthetable
AT mavignermaud latencyreversal20givingtheimmunesystemaseatatthetable
AT chahroudiann latencyreversal20givingtheimmunesystemaseatatthetable