Cargando…

The Role of Chromatid Interference in Determining Meiotic Crossover Patterns

Plants, like all sexually reproducing organisms, create genetic variability by reshuffling parental alleles during meiosis. Patterns of genetic variation in the resulting gametes are determined by the independent assortment of chromosomes in meiosis I and by the number and positioning of crossover (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarens, Marie, Copenhaver, Gregory P., De Storme, Nico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.656691
_version_ 1783668245142700032
author Sarens, Marie
Copenhaver, Gregory P.
De Storme, Nico
author_facet Sarens, Marie
Copenhaver, Gregory P.
De Storme, Nico
author_sort Sarens, Marie
collection PubMed
description Plants, like all sexually reproducing organisms, create genetic variability by reshuffling parental alleles during meiosis. Patterns of genetic variation in the resulting gametes are determined by the independent assortment of chromosomes in meiosis I and by the number and positioning of crossover (CO) events during meiotic recombination. On the chromosome level, spatial distribution of CO events is biased by multiple regulatory mechanisms, such as CO assurance, interference and homeostasis. However, little is known about how multiple COs are distributed among the four chromatids of a bivalent. Chromatid interference (CI) has been proposed as a regulatory mechanism that biases distribution of multiple COs toward specific chromatid partners, however, its existence has not been well-studied and its putative mechanistic basis remains undescribed. Here, we introduce a novel method to quantitatively express CI, and take advantage of available tetrad-based genotyping data from Arabidopsis and maize male meiosis to quantify CI effects on a genome-wide and chromosomal scale. Overall, our analyses reveal random involvement of sister chromatids in double CO events across paired chromosomes, indicating an absence of CI. However, on a genome-wide level, CI was found to vary with physical distance between COs, albeit with different effects in Arabidopsis and maize. While effects of CI are minor in Arabidopsis and maize, the novel methodology introduced here enables quantitative interpretation of CI both on a local and genome-wide scale, and thus provides a key tool to study CI with relevance for both plant genetics and crop breeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7985435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79854352021-03-24 The Role of Chromatid Interference in Determining Meiotic Crossover Patterns Sarens, Marie Copenhaver, Gregory P. De Storme, Nico Front Plant Sci Plant Science Plants, like all sexually reproducing organisms, create genetic variability by reshuffling parental alleles during meiosis. Patterns of genetic variation in the resulting gametes are determined by the independent assortment of chromosomes in meiosis I and by the number and positioning of crossover (CO) events during meiotic recombination. On the chromosome level, spatial distribution of CO events is biased by multiple regulatory mechanisms, such as CO assurance, interference and homeostasis. However, little is known about how multiple COs are distributed among the four chromatids of a bivalent. Chromatid interference (CI) has been proposed as a regulatory mechanism that biases distribution of multiple COs toward specific chromatid partners, however, its existence has not been well-studied and its putative mechanistic basis remains undescribed. Here, we introduce a novel method to quantitatively express CI, and take advantage of available tetrad-based genotyping data from Arabidopsis and maize male meiosis to quantify CI effects on a genome-wide and chromosomal scale. Overall, our analyses reveal random involvement of sister chromatids in double CO events across paired chromosomes, indicating an absence of CI. However, on a genome-wide level, CI was found to vary with physical distance between COs, albeit with different effects in Arabidopsis and maize. While effects of CI are minor in Arabidopsis and maize, the novel methodology introduced here enables quantitative interpretation of CI both on a local and genome-wide scale, and thus provides a key tool to study CI with relevance for both plant genetics and crop breeding. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7985435/ /pubmed/33767725 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.656691 Text en Copyright © 2021 Sarens, Copenhaver and De Storme. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Sarens, Marie
Copenhaver, Gregory P.
De Storme, Nico
The Role of Chromatid Interference in Determining Meiotic Crossover Patterns
title The Role of Chromatid Interference in Determining Meiotic Crossover Patterns
title_full The Role of Chromatid Interference in Determining Meiotic Crossover Patterns
title_fullStr The Role of Chromatid Interference in Determining Meiotic Crossover Patterns
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Chromatid Interference in Determining Meiotic Crossover Patterns
title_short The Role of Chromatid Interference in Determining Meiotic Crossover Patterns
title_sort role of chromatid interference in determining meiotic crossover patterns
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.656691
work_keys_str_mv AT sarensmarie theroleofchromatidinterferenceindeterminingmeioticcrossoverpatterns
AT copenhavergregoryp theroleofchromatidinterferenceindeterminingmeioticcrossoverpatterns
AT destormenico theroleofchromatidinterferenceindeterminingmeioticcrossoverpatterns
AT sarensmarie roleofchromatidinterferenceindeterminingmeioticcrossoverpatterns
AT copenhavergregoryp roleofchromatidinterferenceindeterminingmeioticcrossoverpatterns
AT destormenico roleofchromatidinterferenceindeterminingmeioticcrossoverpatterns