Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Uterine fibroids are common benign tumors among premenopausal women. High- intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging non-invasive intervention which uses the high-intensity ultrasound waves from ultrasound probes to focus on the targeted fibroids. However, the efficacy of HIFU i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yi, Geng, Jinsong, Bao, Haini, Dong, Jiancheng, Shi, Jianwei, Xi, Qinghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767979
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.600800
_version_ 1783668250998996992
author Wang, Yi
Geng, Jinsong
Bao, Haini
Dong, Jiancheng
Shi, Jianwei
Xi, Qinghua
author_facet Wang, Yi
Geng, Jinsong
Bao, Haini
Dong, Jiancheng
Shi, Jianwei
Xi, Qinghua
author_sort Wang, Yi
collection PubMed
description Background: Uterine fibroids are common benign tumors among premenopausal women. High- intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging non-invasive intervention which uses the high-intensity ultrasound waves from ultrasound probes to focus on the targeted fibroids. However, the efficacy of HIFU in comparison with that of other common treatment types in clinical procedure remains unclear. Objective: To investigate the comparative effectiveness and safety of HIFU with other techniques which have been widely used in clinical settings. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database, and three Chinese academic databases, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and cohort studies. The primary outcome was the rate of re-intervention, and the GRADE approach was used to interpret the findings. Results: About 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. HIFU was associated with an increased risk of re-intervention rate in comparison with myomectomy (MYO) [pooled odds ratio (OR): 4.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82–8.9]. The results favored HIFU in comparison with hysterectomy (HYS) on the change of follicle-stimulating hormone [pooled mean difference (MD): −7.95, 95% CI: −8.92–6.98), luteinizing hormone (MD: −4.38, 95% CI: −5.17−3.59), and estradiol (pooled MD: 43.82, 95% CI: 36.92–50.72)]. HIFU had a shorter duration of hospital stay in comparison with MYO (pooled MD: −4.70, 95% CI: −7.46−1.94, p < 0.01). It had a lower incidence of fever (pooled OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.06–0.39, p < 0.01) and a lower incidence of major adverse events (pooled OR: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.00–0.30, p < 0.01) in comparison with HYS. Conclusions: High-intensity focused ultrasound may help maintain feminity and shorten the duration of hospital stay. High-quality clinical studies with a large sample size, a long-term follow-up, and the newest HIFU treatment protocol for evaluating the re-intervention rate are suggested to be carried out. Clinical decision should be based on the specific situation of the patients and individual values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7985460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79854602021-03-24 Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wang, Yi Geng, Jinsong Bao, Haini Dong, Jiancheng Shi, Jianwei Xi, Qinghua Front Oncol Oncology Background: Uterine fibroids are common benign tumors among premenopausal women. High- intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging non-invasive intervention which uses the high-intensity ultrasound waves from ultrasound probes to focus on the targeted fibroids. However, the efficacy of HIFU in comparison with that of other common treatment types in clinical procedure remains unclear. Objective: To investigate the comparative effectiveness and safety of HIFU with other techniques which have been widely used in clinical settings. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database, and three Chinese academic databases, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and cohort studies. The primary outcome was the rate of re-intervention, and the GRADE approach was used to interpret the findings. Results: About 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. HIFU was associated with an increased risk of re-intervention rate in comparison with myomectomy (MYO) [pooled odds ratio (OR): 4.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82–8.9]. The results favored HIFU in comparison with hysterectomy (HYS) on the change of follicle-stimulating hormone [pooled mean difference (MD): −7.95, 95% CI: −8.92–6.98), luteinizing hormone (MD: −4.38, 95% CI: −5.17−3.59), and estradiol (pooled MD: 43.82, 95% CI: 36.92–50.72)]. HIFU had a shorter duration of hospital stay in comparison with MYO (pooled MD: −4.70, 95% CI: −7.46−1.94, p < 0.01). It had a lower incidence of fever (pooled OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.06–0.39, p < 0.01) and a lower incidence of major adverse events (pooled OR: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.00–0.30, p < 0.01) in comparison with HYS. Conclusions: High-intensity focused ultrasound may help maintain feminity and shorten the duration of hospital stay. High-quality clinical studies with a large sample size, a long-term follow-up, and the newest HIFU treatment protocol for evaluating the re-intervention rate are suggested to be carried out. Clinical decision should be based on the specific situation of the patients and individual values. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7985460/ /pubmed/33767979 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.600800 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Geng, Bao, Dong, Shi and Xi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wang, Yi
Geng, Jinsong
Bao, Haini
Dong, Jiancheng
Shi, Jianwei
Xi, Qinghua
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparative effectiveness and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound for uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767979
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.600800
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyi comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofhighintensityfocusedultrasoundforuterinefibroidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gengjinsong comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofhighintensityfocusedultrasoundforuterinefibroidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baohaini comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofhighintensityfocusedultrasoundforuterinefibroidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dongjiancheng comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofhighintensityfocusedultrasoundforuterinefibroidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shijianwei comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofhighintensityfocusedultrasoundforuterinefibroidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiqinghua comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofhighintensityfocusedultrasoundforuterinefibroidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis