Cargando…
Transcranial focused ultrasound phase correction using the hybrid angular spectrum method
The InSightec Exablate system is the standard of care used for transcranial focused ultrasound ablation treatments in the United States. The system calculates phase corrections that account for aberrations caused by the human skull. This work investigates whether skull aberration correction can be i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33753771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85535-5 |
_version_ | 1783668262412746752 |
---|---|
author | Leung, Steven A. Moore, David Webb, Taylor D. Snell, John Ghanouni, Pejman Butts Pauly, Kim |
author_facet | Leung, Steven A. Moore, David Webb, Taylor D. Snell, John Ghanouni, Pejman Butts Pauly, Kim |
author_sort | Leung, Steven A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The InSightec Exablate system is the standard of care used for transcranial focused ultrasound ablation treatments in the United States. The system calculates phase corrections that account for aberrations caused by the human skull. This work investigates whether skull aberration correction can be improved by comparing the standard of care InSightec ray tracing method with the hybrid angular spectrum (HAS) method and the gold standard hydrophone method. Three degassed ex vivo human skulls were sonicated with a 670 kHz hemispherical phased array transducer (InSightec Exablate 4000). Phase corrections were calculated using four different methods (straight ray tracing, InSightec ray tracing, HAS, and hydrophone) and were used to drive the transducer. 3D raster scans of the beam profiles were acquired using a hydrophone mounted on a 3-axis positioner system. Focal spots were evaluated using six metrics: pressure at the target, peak pressure, intensity at the target, peak intensity, positioning error, and focal spot volume. For three skulls, the InSightec ray tracing method achieved 52 ± 21% normalized target intensity (normalized to hydrophone), 76 ± 17% normalized peak intensity, and 0.72 ± 0.47 mm positioning error. The HAS method achieved 74 ± 9% normalized target intensity, 81 ± 9% normalized peak intensity, and 0.35 ± 0.09 mm positioning error. The InSightec-to-HAS improvement in focal spot targeting provides promise in improving treatment outcomes. These improvements to skull aberration correction are also highly relevant for the applications of focused ultrasound neuromodulation and blood brain barrier opening, which are currently being translated for human use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7985511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79855112021-03-25 Transcranial focused ultrasound phase correction using the hybrid angular spectrum method Leung, Steven A. Moore, David Webb, Taylor D. Snell, John Ghanouni, Pejman Butts Pauly, Kim Sci Rep Article The InSightec Exablate system is the standard of care used for transcranial focused ultrasound ablation treatments in the United States. The system calculates phase corrections that account for aberrations caused by the human skull. This work investigates whether skull aberration correction can be improved by comparing the standard of care InSightec ray tracing method with the hybrid angular spectrum (HAS) method and the gold standard hydrophone method. Three degassed ex vivo human skulls were sonicated with a 670 kHz hemispherical phased array transducer (InSightec Exablate 4000). Phase corrections were calculated using four different methods (straight ray tracing, InSightec ray tracing, HAS, and hydrophone) and were used to drive the transducer. 3D raster scans of the beam profiles were acquired using a hydrophone mounted on a 3-axis positioner system. Focal spots were evaluated using six metrics: pressure at the target, peak pressure, intensity at the target, peak intensity, positioning error, and focal spot volume. For three skulls, the InSightec ray tracing method achieved 52 ± 21% normalized target intensity (normalized to hydrophone), 76 ± 17% normalized peak intensity, and 0.72 ± 0.47 mm positioning error. The HAS method achieved 74 ± 9% normalized target intensity, 81 ± 9% normalized peak intensity, and 0.35 ± 0.09 mm positioning error. The InSightec-to-HAS improvement in focal spot targeting provides promise in improving treatment outcomes. These improvements to skull aberration correction are also highly relevant for the applications of focused ultrasound neuromodulation and blood brain barrier opening, which are currently being translated for human use. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7985511/ /pubmed/33753771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85535-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Leung, Steven A. Moore, David Webb, Taylor D. Snell, John Ghanouni, Pejman Butts Pauly, Kim Transcranial focused ultrasound phase correction using the hybrid angular spectrum method |
title | Transcranial focused ultrasound phase correction using the hybrid angular spectrum method |
title_full | Transcranial focused ultrasound phase correction using the hybrid angular spectrum method |
title_fullStr | Transcranial focused ultrasound phase correction using the hybrid angular spectrum method |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcranial focused ultrasound phase correction using the hybrid angular spectrum method |
title_short | Transcranial focused ultrasound phase correction using the hybrid angular spectrum method |
title_sort | transcranial focused ultrasound phase correction using the hybrid angular spectrum method |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33753771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85535-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leungstevena transcranialfocusedultrasoundphasecorrectionusingthehybridangularspectrummethod AT mooredavid transcranialfocusedultrasoundphasecorrectionusingthehybridangularspectrummethod AT webbtaylord transcranialfocusedultrasoundphasecorrectionusingthehybridangularspectrummethod AT snelljohn transcranialfocusedultrasoundphasecorrectionusingthehybridangularspectrummethod AT ghanounipejman transcranialfocusedultrasoundphasecorrectionusingthehybridangularspectrummethod AT buttspaulykim transcranialfocusedultrasoundphasecorrectionusingthehybridangularspectrummethod |