Cargando…
Why and how to engage expert stakeholders in ontology development: insights from social and behavioural sciences
BACKGROUND: Incorporating the feedback of expert stakeholders in ontology development is important to ensure content is appropriate, comprehensive, meets community needs and is interoperable with other ontologies and classification systems. However, domain experts are often not formally engaged in o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33757593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-021-00240-6 |
_version_ | 1783668280450351104 |
---|---|
author | Norris, Emma Hastings, Janna Marques, Marta M. Mutlu, Ailbhe N. Finnerty Zink, Silje Michie, Susan |
author_facet | Norris, Emma Hastings, Janna Marques, Marta M. Mutlu, Ailbhe N. Finnerty Zink, Silje Michie, Susan |
author_sort | Norris, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Incorporating the feedback of expert stakeholders in ontology development is important to ensure content is appropriate, comprehensive, meets community needs and is interoperable with other ontologies and classification systems. However, domain experts are often not formally engaged in ontology development, and there is little available guidance on how this involvement should best be conducted and managed. Social and behavioural science studies often involve expert feedback in the development of tools and classification systems but have had little engagement with ontology development. This paper aims to (i) demonstrate how expert feedback can enhance ontology development, and (ii) provide practical recommendations on how to conduct expert feedback in ontology development using methodologies from the social and behavioural sciences. MAIN BODY: Considerations for selecting methods for engaging stakeholders are presented. Mailing lists and issue trackers as existing methods used frequently in ontology development are discussed. Advisory boards and working groups, feedback tasks, consensus exercises, discussions and workshops are presented as potential methods from social and behavioural sciences to incorporate in ontology development. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of methods from the social and behavioural sciences exist to enable feedback from expert stakeholders in ontology development. Engaging domain experts in ontology development enables depth and clarity in ontology development, whilst also establishing advocates for an ontology upon its completion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7985588 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79855882021-03-23 Why and how to engage expert stakeholders in ontology development: insights from social and behavioural sciences Norris, Emma Hastings, Janna Marques, Marta M. Mutlu, Ailbhe N. Finnerty Zink, Silje Michie, Susan J Biomed Semantics Review BACKGROUND: Incorporating the feedback of expert stakeholders in ontology development is important to ensure content is appropriate, comprehensive, meets community needs and is interoperable with other ontologies and classification systems. However, domain experts are often not formally engaged in ontology development, and there is little available guidance on how this involvement should best be conducted and managed. Social and behavioural science studies often involve expert feedback in the development of tools and classification systems but have had little engagement with ontology development. This paper aims to (i) demonstrate how expert feedback can enhance ontology development, and (ii) provide practical recommendations on how to conduct expert feedback in ontology development using methodologies from the social and behavioural sciences. MAIN BODY: Considerations for selecting methods for engaging stakeholders are presented. Mailing lists and issue trackers as existing methods used frequently in ontology development are discussed. Advisory boards and working groups, feedback tasks, consensus exercises, discussions and workshops are presented as potential methods from social and behavioural sciences to incorporate in ontology development. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of methods from the social and behavioural sciences exist to enable feedback from expert stakeholders in ontology development. Engaging domain experts in ontology development enables depth and clarity in ontology development, whilst also establishing advocates for an ontology upon its completion. BioMed Central 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7985588/ /pubmed/33757593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-021-00240-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Norris, Emma Hastings, Janna Marques, Marta M. Mutlu, Ailbhe N. Finnerty Zink, Silje Michie, Susan Why and how to engage expert stakeholders in ontology development: insights from social and behavioural sciences |
title | Why and how to engage expert stakeholders in ontology development: insights from social and behavioural sciences |
title_full | Why and how to engage expert stakeholders in ontology development: insights from social and behavioural sciences |
title_fullStr | Why and how to engage expert stakeholders in ontology development: insights from social and behavioural sciences |
title_full_unstemmed | Why and how to engage expert stakeholders in ontology development: insights from social and behavioural sciences |
title_short | Why and how to engage expert stakeholders in ontology development: insights from social and behavioural sciences |
title_sort | why and how to engage expert stakeholders in ontology development: insights from social and behavioural sciences |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33757593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-021-00240-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT norrisemma whyandhowtoengageexpertstakeholdersinontologydevelopmentinsightsfromsocialandbehaviouralsciences AT hastingsjanna whyandhowtoengageexpertstakeholdersinontologydevelopmentinsightsfromsocialandbehaviouralsciences AT marquesmartam whyandhowtoengageexpertstakeholdersinontologydevelopmentinsightsfromsocialandbehaviouralsciences AT mutluailbhenfinnerty whyandhowtoengageexpertstakeholdersinontologydevelopmentinsightsfromsocialandbehaviouralsciences AT zinksilje whyandhowtoengageexpertstakeholdersinontologydevelopmentinsightsfromsocialandbehaviouralsciences AT michiesusan whyandhowtoengageexpertstakeholdersinontologydevelopmentinsightsfromsocialandbehaviouralsciences |