Cargando…

Pregnant women's perspectives on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine

BACKGROUND: Since coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines have been distributed, a debate has raised on whether pregnant women should get the vaccine. No available data exist so far regarding the safety, efficacy, and toxicology of these vaccines when administered during pregnancy. Most of the Obstetrics...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carbone, Luigi, Mappa, Ilenia, Sirico, Angelo, Di Girolamo, Raffaella, Saccone, Gabriele, Di Mascio, Daniele, Donadono, Vera, Cuomo, Lara, Gabrielli, Olimpia, Migliorini, Sonia, Luviso, Maria, D'antonio, Francesco, Rizzo, Giuseppe, Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100352
_version_ 1783668297769680896
author Carbone, Luigi
Mappa, Ilenia
Sirico, Angelo
Di Girolamo, Raffaella
Saccone, Gabriele
Di Mascio, Daniele
Donadono, Vera
Cuomo, Lara
Gabrielli, Olimpia
Migliorini, Sonia
Luviso, Maria
D'antonio, Francesco
Rizzo, Giuseppe
Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria
author_facet Carbone, Luigi
Mappa, Ilenia
Sirico, Angelo
Di Girolamo, Raffaella
Saccone, Gabriele
Di Mascio, Daniele
Donadono, Vera
Cuomo, Lara
Gabrielli, Olimpia
Migliorini, Sonia
Luviso, Maria
D'antonio, Francesco
Rizzo, Giuseppe
Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria
author_sort Carbone, Luigi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines have been distributed, a debate has raised on whether pregnant women should get the vaccine. No available data exist so far regarding the safety, efficacy, and toxicology of these vaccines when administered during pregnancy. Most of the Obstetrics and Gynecology societies suggested that pregnant could agree to be vaccinated, after a thorough counseling of risks and benefits with their gynecologists, thus leading to an autonomous decision. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the attitude to coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women in Italy. STUDY DESIGN: A survey was made at the University of Naples Federico II and the Ospedale Cristo Re, Tor Vergata University of Rome, on pregnant and breastfeeding women asking their perspectives on the available vaccines after reading the recommendations issued by our national Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Neonatology societies. The questionnaire included 12 items finalized to evaluate general features of the women and 6 items specifically correlated to their attitudes toward the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare group differences of categorical variables and Wilcoxon signed rank or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of the University of Naples Federico II (ref. no. 409/2020) and the Ospedale Cristo Re, Tor Vergata University of Rome (ref. #Ost4-2020). RESULTS: Most of the included women did not agree to eventually receive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine during pregnancy (40 [28.2%] vs 102 [71.8%]). Being pregnant was considered a determinant factor to refuse the vaccine prophylaxis (99 [69.7%] vs 43 [30.3%]; chi-square test=24.187; P<.001), even if a very large percentage declared to be generally in favor of vaccines (128 [90.1%] vs 14 [9.9%]; chi-square test=6.091; P=.014) and most of them confirmed they received or would receive other recommended vaccines during pregnancy (75 [52.8%] vs 67 [47.2%]; chi-square test=10.996; P=.001). CONCLUSION: Urgent data are needed on the safety, efficacy, and toxicology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccines during pregnancy to modify this trend and to help obstetricians during the counseling. Furthermore, pregnant women should be included in future vaccine development trials to not incur again in such uncertainty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7985679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79856792021-03-23 Pregnant women's perspectives on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine Carbone, Luigi Mappa, Ilenia Sirico, Angelo Di Girolamo, Raffaella Saccone, Gabriele Di Mascio, Daniele Donadono, Vera Cuomo, Lara Gabrielli, Olimpia Migliorini, Sonia Luviso, Maria D'antonio, Francesco Rizzo, Giuseppe Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM Original Research BACKGROUND: Since coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines have been distributed, a debate has raised on whether pregnant women should get the vaccine. No available data exist so far regarding the safety, efficacy, and toxicology of these vaccines when administered during pregnancy. Most of the Obstetrics and Gynecology societies suggested that pregnant could agree to be vaccinated, after a thorough counseling of risks and benefits with their gynecologists, thus leading to an autonomous decision. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the attitude to coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women in Italy. STUDY DESIGN: A survey was made at the University of Naples Federico II and the Ospedale Cristo Re, Tor Vergata University of Rome, on pregnant and breastfeeding women asking their perspectives on the available vaccines after reading the recommendations issued by our national Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Neonatology societies. The questionnaire included 12 items finalized to evaluate general features of the women and 6 items specifically correlated to their attitudes toward the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare group differences of categorical variables and Wilcoxon signed rank or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of the University of Naples Federico II (ref. no. 409/2020) and the Ospedale Cristo Re, Tor Vergata University of Rome (ref. #Ost4-2020). RESULTS: Most of the included women did not agree to eventually receive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine during pregnancy (40 [28.2%] vs 102 [71.8%]). Being pregnant was considered a determinant factor to refuse the vaccine prophylaxis (99 [69.7%] vs 43 [30.3%]; chi-square test=24.187; P<.001), even if a very large percentage declared to be generally in favor of vaccines (128 [90.1%] vs 14 [9.9%]; chi-square test=6.091; P=.014) and most of them confirmed they received or would receive other recommended vaccines during pregnancy (75 [52.8%] vs 67 [47.2%]; chi-square test=10.996; P=.001). CONCLUSION: Urgent data are needed on the safety, efficacy, and toxicology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccines during pregnancy to modify this trend and to help obstetricians during the counseling. Furthermore, pregnant women should be included in future vaccine development trials to not incur again in such uncertainty. Elsevier Inc. 2021-07 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7985679/ /pubmed/33771762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100352 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Research
Carbone, Luigi
Mappa, Ilenia
Sirico, Angelo
Di Girolamo, Raffaella
Saccone, Gabriele
Di Mascio, Daniele
Donadono, Vera
Cuomo, Lara
Gabrielli, Olimpia
Migliorini, Sonia
Luviso, Maria
D'antonio, Francesco
Rizzo, Giuseppe
Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria
Pregnant women's perspectives on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine
title Pregnant women's perspectives on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine
title_full Pregnant women's perspectives on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine
title_fullStr Pregnant women's perspectives on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine
title_full_unstemmed Pregnant women's perspectives on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine
title_short Pregnant women's perspectives on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine
title_sort pregnant women's perspectives on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100352
work_keys_str_mv AT carboneluigi pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine
AT mappailenia pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine
AT siricoangelo pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine
AT digirolamoraffaella pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine
AT sacconegabriele pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine
AT dimasciodaniele pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine
AT donadonovera pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine
AT cuomolara pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine
AT gabrielliolimpia pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine
AT migliorinisonia pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine
AT luvisomaria pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine
AT dantoniofrancesco pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine
AT rizzogiuseppe pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine
AT maruottigiuseppemaria pregnantwomensperspectivesonsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2vaccine