Cargando…

Accuracy of NIH Stroke Scale for diagnosing aphasia

OBJECTIVES: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) has not been validated to diagnose aphasia in the stroke population. We therefore examined the diagnostic accuracy of NIHSS for detecting aphasia in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute first‐ever ischemic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grönberg, Angelina, Henriksson, Ingrid, Lindgren, Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33368189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13388
_version_ 1783668333311164416
author Grönberg, Angelina
Henriksson, Ingrid
Lindgren, Arne
author_facet Grönberg, Angelina
Henriksson, Ingrid
Lindgren, Arne
author_sort Grönberg, Angelina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) has not been validated to diagnose aphasia in the stroke population. We therefore examined the diagnostic accuracy of NIHSS for detecting aphasia in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute first‐ever ischemic stroke were included prospectively in Lund Stroke Register Study at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden. Exclusion criteria were: (a) non‐native Swedish; (b) obtundation (c) dementia or psychiatric diagnosis. Patients were assessed with NIHSS item 9 (range 0–3, where 1–3 indicate aphasia) by a NIHSS certified research nurse in the acute phase after stroke onset (median 3 days). Within 24 h after this assessment, a speech therapist evaluated the patients’ language function with the comprehensive language screening test (LAST, range 0–15 where 0–14 indicates aphasia). Data were analyzed using LAST as ‘reference standard’. RESULTS: We examined 221 patients. Among these, 23% (n = 50) had aphasia according to NIHSS (distribution of scores 0, 1, 2, 3 were n = 171, n = 29, n = 12, n = 9) compared to 26% (n = 58) with aphasia according to LAST (score ≤14; median = 11). Assuming LAST as reference standard, NIHSS gave 16 false negatives (NIHSS item 9 = 0) for aphasia (LAST scores range 8–14), and 8 false positives (NIHSS item 9 score = 1) for aphasia, yielding a sensitivity of 72% (0.59–0.83) and a specificity of 95% (0.91–0.98). CONCLUSIONS: When using NIHSS for screening and diagnosing aphasia in adults with acute ischemic stroke, patients with severe aphasia can be detected, however, some mild aphasias might be misclassified. Given the 72% sensitivity, absence of aphasia on the NIHSS should not be used to guide stroke treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7985870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79858702021-03-25 Accuracy of NIH Stroke Scale for diagnosing aphasia Grönberg, Angelina Henriksson, Ingrid Lindgren, Arne Acta Neurol Scand Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) has not been validated to diagnose aphasia in the stroke population. We therefore examined the diagnostic accuracy of NIHSS for detecting aphasia in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute first‐ever ischemic stroke were included prospectively in Lund Stroke Register Study at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden. Exclusion criteria were: (a) non‐native Swedish; (b) obtundation (c) dementia or psychiatric diagnosis. Patients were assessed with NIHSS item 9 (range 0–3, where 1–3 indicate aphasia) by a NIHSS certified research nurse in the acute phase after stroke onset (median 3 days). Within 24 h after this assessment, a speech therapist evaluated the patients’ language function with the comprehensive language screening test (LAST, range 0–15 where 0–14 indicates aphasia). Data were analyzed using LAST as ‘reference standard’. RESULTS: We examined 221 patients. Among these, 23% (n = 50) had aphasia according to NIHSS (distribution of scores 0, 1, 2, 3 were n = 171, n = 29, n = 12, n = 9) compared to 26% (n = 58) with aphasia according to LAST (score ≤14; median = 11). Assuming LAST as reference standard, NIHSS gave 16 false negatives (NIHSS item 9 = 0) for aphasia (LAST scores range 8–14), and 8 false positives (NIHSS item 9 score = 1) for aphasia, yielding a sensitivity of 72% (0.59–0.83) and a specificity of 95% (0.91–0.98). CONCLUSIONS: When using NIHSS for screening and diagnosing aphasia in adults with acute ischemic stroke, patients with severe aphasia can be detected, however, some mild aphasias might be misclassified. Given the 72% sensitivity, absence of aphasia on the NIHSS should not be used to guide stroke treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-27 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7985870/ /pubmed/33368189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13388 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Grönberg, Angelina
Henriksson, Ingrid
Lindgren, Arne
Accuracy of NIH Stroke Scale for diagnosing aphasia
title Accuracy of NIH Stroke Scale for diagnosing aphasia
title_full Accuracy of NIH Stroke Scale for diagnosing aphasia
title_fullStr Accuracy of NIH Stroke Scale for diagnosing aphasia
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of NIH Stroke Scale for diagnosing aphasia
title_short Accuracy of NIH Stroke Scale for diagnosing aphasia
title_sort accuracy of nih stroke scale for diagnosing aphasia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33368189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13388
work_keys_str_mv AT gronbergangelina accuracyofnihstrokescalefordiagnosingaphasia
AT henrikssoningrid accuracyofnihstrokescalefordiagnosingaphasia
AT lindgrenarne accuracyofnihstrokescalefordiagnosingaphasia