Cargando…

Repeatability of IVIM biomarkers from diffusion‐weighted MRI in head and neck: Bayesian probability versus neural network

PURPOSE: The intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model for DWI might provide useful biomarkers for disease management in head and neck cancer. This study compared the repeatability of three IVIM fitting methods to the conventional nonlinear least‐squares regression: Bayesian probability estimation,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koopman, Thomas, Martens, Roland, Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J., Yaqub, Maqsood, Lavini, Cristina, de Graaf, Pim, Castelijns, Jonas, Boellaard, Ronald, Marcus, J. Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33501657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28671
_version_ 1783668396803489792
author Koopman, Thomas
Martens, Roland
Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J.
Yaqub, Maqsood
Lavini, Cristina
de Graaf, Pim
Castelijns, Jonas
Boellaard, Ronald
Marcus, J. Tim
author_facet Koopman, Thomas
Martens, Roland
Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J.
Yaqub, Maqsood
Lavini, Cristina
de Graaf, Pim
Castelijns, Jonas
Boellaard, Ronald
Marcus, J. Tim
author_sort Koopman, Thomas
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model for DWI might provide useful biomarkers for disease management in head and neck cancer. This study compared the repeatability of three IVIM fitting methods to the conventional nonlinear least‐squares regression: Bayesian probability estimation, a recently introduced neural network approach, IVIM‐NET, and a version of the neural network modified to increase consistency, IVIM‐NET(mod). METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers underwent two imaging sessions of the neck, two weeks apart, with two DWI acquisitions per session. Model parameters (ADC, diffusion coefficient [Formula: see text] , perfusion fraction [Formula: see text] , and pseudo‐diffusion coefficient [Formula: see text]) from each fit method were determined in the tonsils and in the pterygoid muscles. Within‐subject coefficients of variation (wCV) were calculated to assess repeatability. Training of the neural network was repeated 100 times with random initialization to investigate consistency, quantified by the coefficient of variance. RESULTS: The Bayesian and neural network approaches outperformed nonlinear regression in terms of wCV. Intersession wCV of [Formula: see text] in the tonsils was 23.4% for nonlinear regression, 9.7% for Bayesian estimation, 9.4% for IVIM‐NET, and 11.2% for IVIM‐NET(mod). However, results from repeated training of the neural network on the same data set showed differences in parameter estimates: The coefficient of variances over the 100 repetitions for IVIM‐NET were 15% for both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , and 94% for [Formula: see text]; for IVIM‐NET(mod), these values improved to 5%, 9%, and 62%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Repeatabilities from the Bayesian and neural network approaches are superior to that of nonlinear regression for estimating IVIM parameters in the head and neck.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7986193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79861932021-03-25 Repeatability of IVIM biomarkers from diffusion‐weighted MRI in head and neck: Bayesian probability versus neural network Koopman, Thomas Martens, Roland Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J. Yaqub, Maqsood Lavini, Cristina de Graaf, Pim Castelijns, Jonas Boellaard, Ronald Marcus, J. Tim Magn Reson Med Note—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research PURPOSE: The intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model for DWI might provide useful biomarkers for disease management in head and neck cancer. This study compared the repeatability of three IVIM fitting methods to the conventional nonlinear least‐squares regression: Bayesian probability estimation, a recently introduced neural network approach, IVIM‐NET, and a version of the neural network modified to increase consistency, IVIM‐NET(mod). METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers underwent two imaging sessions of the neck, two weeks apart, with two DWI acquisitions per session. Model parameters (ADC, diffusion coefficient [Formula: see text] , perfusion fraction [Formula: see text] , and pseudo‐diffusion coefficient [Formula: see text]) from each fit method were determined in the tonsils and in the pterygoid muscles. Within‐subject coefficients of variation (wCV) were calculated to assess repeatability. Training of the neural network was repeated 100 times with random initialization to investigate consistency, quantified by the coefficient of variance. RESULTS: The Bayesian and neural network approaches outperformed nonlinear regression in terms of wCV. Intersession wCV of [Formula: see text] in the tonsils was 23.4% for nonlinear regression, 9.7% for Bayesian estimation, 9.4% for IVIM‐NET, and 11.2% for IVIM‐NET(mod). However, results from repeated training of the neural network on the same data set showed differences in parameter estimates: The coefficient of variances over the 100 repetitions for IVIM‐NET were 15% for both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , and 94% for [Formula: see text]; for IVIM‐NET(mod), these values improved to 5%, 9%, and 62%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Repeatabilities from the Bayesian and neural network approaches are superior to that of nonlinear regression for estimating IVIM parameters in the head and neck. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-26 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7986193/ /pubmed/33501657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28671 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Note—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research
Koopman, Thomas
Martens, Roland
Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J.
Yaqub, Maqsood
Lavini, Cristina
de Graaf, Pim
Castelijns, Jonas
Boellaard, Ronald
Marcus, J. Tim
Repeatability of IVIM biomarkers from diffusion‐weighted MRI in head and neck: Bayesian probability versus neural network
title Repeatability of IVIM biomarkers from diffusion‐weighted MRI in head and neck: Bayesian probability versus neural network
title_full Repeatability of IVIM biomarkers from diffusion‐weighted MRI in head and neck: Bayesian probability versus neural network
title_fullStr Repeatability of IVIM biomarkers from diffusion‐weighted MRI in head and neck: Bayesian probability versus neural network
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability of IVIM biomarkers from diffusion‐weighted MRI in head and neck: Bayesian probability versus neural network
title_short Repeatability of IVIM biomarkers from diffusion‐weighted MRI in head and neck: Bayesian probability versus neural network
title_sort repeatability of ivim biomarkers from diffusion‐weighted mri in head and neck: bayesian probability versus neural network
topic Note—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33501657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28671
work_keys_str_mv AT koopmanthomas repeatabilityofivimbiomarkersfromdiffusionweightedmriinheadandneckbayesianprobabilityversusneuralnetwork
AT martensroland repeatabilityofivimbiomarkersfromdiffusionweightedmriinheadandneckbayesianprobabilityversusneuralnetwork
AT gurneychampionoliverj repeatabilityofivimbiomarkersfromdiffusionweightedmriinheadandneckbayesianprobabilityversusneuralnetwork
AT yaqubmaqsood repeatabilityofivimbiomarkersfromdiffusionweightedmriinheadandneckbayesianprobabilityversusneuralnetwork
AT lavinicristina repeatabilityofivimbiomarkersfromdiffusionweightedmriinheadandneckbayesianprobabilityversusneuralnetwork
AT degraafpim repeatabilityofivimbiomarkersfromdiffusionweightedmriinheadandneckbayesianprobabilityversusneuralnetwork
AT castelijnsjonas repeatabilityofivimbiomarkersfromdiffusionweightedmriinheadandneckbayesianprobabilityversusneuralnetwork
AT boellaardronald repeatabilityofivimbiomarkersfromdiffusionweightedmriinheadandneckbayesianprobabilityversusneuralnetwork
AT marcusjtim repeatabilityofivimbiomarkersfromdiffusionweightedmriinheadandneckbayesianprobabilityversusneuralnetwork