Cargando…

Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section rates are higher among pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART) compared to spontaneous conceptions (SC), implying an increase in neonatal and maternal morbidity. We aimed to compare caesarean section rates in ART pregnancies versus SC, overall, b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lodge-Tulloch, Nakeisha A., Elias, Flavia T. S., Pudwell, Jessica, Gaudet, Laura, Walker, Mark, Smith, Graeme N., Velez, Maria P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33752633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03711-x
_version_ 1783668411565342720
author Lodge-Tulloch, Nakeisha A.
Elias, Flavia T. S.
Pudwell, Jessica
Gaudet, Laura
Walker, Mark
Smith, Graeme N.
Velez, Maria P.
author_facet Lodge-Tulloch, Nakeisha A.
Elias, Flavia T. S.
Pudwell, Jessica
Gaudet, Laura
Walker, Mark
Smith, Graeme N.
Velez, Maria P.
author_sort Lodge-Tulloch, Nakeisha A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caesarean section rates are higher among pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART) compared to spontaneous conceptions (SC), implying an increase in neonatal and maternal morbidity. We aimed to compare caesarean section rates in ART pregnancies versus SC, overall, by indication (elective versus emergent), and by type of ART treatment (in-vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), fresh embryo transfer, frozen embryo transfer) in a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL databases using the OVID Platform from 1993 to 2019, and the search was completed in January 2020. The eligibility criteria were cohort studies with singleton conceptions after in-vitro fertilization and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection using autologous oocytes versus spontaneous conceptions. The study quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and GRADE approach. Meta-analyses were performed using odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using random effect models in RevMan 5.3, and I-squared (I(2)) test > 75% was considered as high heterogeneity. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred fifty studies were identified from the search of which 34 met the inclusion criteria. Compared to spontaneous conceptions, IVF/ICSI pregnancies were associated with a 1.90-fold increase of odds of caesarean section (95% CI 1.76, 2.06). When stratified by indication, IVF/ICSI pregnancies were associated with a 1.91-fold increase of odds of elective caesarean section (95% CI 1.37, 2.67) and 1.38-fold increase of odds of emergent caesarean section (95% CI 1.09, 1.75). The heterogeneity of the studies was high and the GRADE assessment moderate to low, which can be explained by the observational design of the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: The odds of delivering by caesarean section are greater for ART singleton pregnancies compared to spontaneous conceptions. Preconception and pregnancy care plans should focus on minimizing the risks that may lead to emergency caesarean sections and finding strategies to understand and decrease the rate of elective caesarean sections. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-03711-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7986269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79862692021-03-24 Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lodge-Tulloch, Nakeisha A. Elias, Flavia T. S. Pudwell, Jessica Gaudet, Laura Walker, Mark Smith, Graeme N. Velez, Maria P. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Caesarean section rates are higher among pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART) compared to spontaneous conceptions (SC), implying an increase in neonatal and maternal morbidity. We aimed to compare caesarean section rates in ART pregnancies versus SC, overall, by indication (elective versus emergent), and by type of ART treatment (in-vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), fresh embryo transfer, frozen embryo transfer) in a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL databases using the OVID Platform from 1993 to 2019, and the search was completed in January 2020. The eligibility criteria were cohort studies with singleton conceptions after in-vitro fertilization and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection using autologous oocytes versus spontaneous conceptions. The study quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and GRADE approach. Meta-analyses were performed using odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using random effect models in RevMan 5.3, and I-squared (I(2)) test > 75% was considered as high heterogeneity. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred fifty studies were identified from the search of which 34 met the inclusion criteria. Compared to spontaneous conceptions, IVF/ICSI pregnancies were associated with a 1.90-fold increase of odds of caesarean section (95% CI 1.76, 2.06). When stratified by indication, IVF/ICSI pregnancies were associated with a 1.91-fold increase of odds of elective caesarean section (95% CI 1.37, 2.67) and 1.38-fold increase of odds of emergent caesarean section (95% CI 1.09, 1.75). The heterogeneity of the studies was high and the GRADE assessment moderate to low, which can be explained by the observational design of the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: The odds of delivering by caesarean section are greater for ART singleton pregnancies compared to spontaneous conceptions. Preconception and pregnancy care plans should focus on minimizing the risks that may lead to emergency caesarean sections and finding strategies to understand and decrease the rate of elective caesarean sections. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-03711-x. BioMed Central 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7986269/ /pubmed/33752633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03711-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lodge-Tulloch, Nakeisha A.
Elias, Flavia T. S.
Pudwell, Jessica
Gaudet, Laura
Walker, Mark
Smith, Graeme N.
Velez, Maria P.
Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33752633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03711-x
work_keys_str_mv AT lodgetullochnakeishaa caesareansectioninpregnanciesconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eliasflaviats caesareansectioninpregnanciesconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pudwelljessica caesareansectioninpregnanciesconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaudetlaura caesareansectioninpregnanciesconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT walkermark caesareansectioninpregnanciesconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT smithgraemen caesareansectioninpregnanciesconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT velezmariap caesareansectioninpregnanciesconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis