Cargando…

Wild bees as winners and losers: Relative impacts of landscape composition, quality, and climate

Wild bees, like many other taxa, are threatened by land‐use and climate change, which, in turn, jeopardizes pollination of crops and wild plants. Understanding how land‐use and climate factors interact is critical to predicting and managing pollinator populations and ensuring adequate pollination se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kammerer, Melanie, Goslee, Sarah C., Douglas, Margaret R., Tooker, John F., Grozinger, Christina M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15485
_version_ 1783668427628478464
author Kammerer, Melanie
Goslee, Sarah C.
Douglas, Margaret R.
Tooker, John F.
Grozinger, Christina M.
author_facet Kammerer, Melanie
Goslee, Sarah C.
Douglas, Margaret R.
Tooker, John F.
Grozinger, Christina M.
author_sort Kammerer, Melanie
collection PubMed
description Wild bees, like many other taxa, are threatened by land‐use and climate change, which, in turn, jeopardizes pollination of crops and wild plants. Understanding how land‐use and climate factors interact is critical to predicting and managing pollinator populations and ensuring adequate pollination services, but most studies have evaluated either land‐use or climate effects, not both. Furthermore, bee species are incredibly variable, spanning an array of behavioral, physiological, and life‐history traits that can increase or decrease resilience to land‐use or climate change. Thus, there are likely bee species that benefit, while others suffer, from changing climate and land use, but few studies have documented taxon‐specific trends. To address these critical knowledge gaps, we analyzed a long‐term dataset of wild bee occurrences from Maryland, Delaware, and Washington DC, USA, examining how different bee genera and functional groups respond to landscape composition, quality, and climate factors. Despite a large body of literature documenting land‐use effects on wild bees, in this study, climate factors emerged as the main drivers of wild‐bee abundance and richness. For wild‐bee communities in spring and summer/fall, temperature and precipitation were more important predictors than landscape composition, landscape quality, or topography. However, relationships varied substantially between wild‐bee genera and functional groups. In the Northeast USA, past trends and future predictions show a changing climate with warmer winters, more intense precipitation in winter and spring, and longer growing seasons with higher maximum temperatures. In almost all of our analyses, these conditions were associated with lower abundance of wild bees. Wild‐bee richness results were more mixed, including neutral and positive relationships with predicted temperature and precipitation patterns. Thus, in this region and undoubtedly more broadly, changing climate poses a significant threat to wild‐bee communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7986353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79863532021-03-25 Wild bees as winners and losers: Relative impacts of landscape composition, quality, and climate Kammerer, Melanie Goslee, Sarah C. Douglas, Margaret R. Tooker, John F. Grozinger, Christina M. Glob Chang Biol Primary Research Articles Wild bees, like many other taxa, are threatened by land‐use and climate change, which, in turn, jeopardizes pollination of crops and wild plants. Understanding how land‐use and climate factors interact is critical to predicting and managing pollinator populations and ensuring adequate pollination services, but most studies have evaluated either land‐use or climate effects, not both. Furthermore, bee species are incredibly variable, spanning an array of behavioral, physiological, and life‐history traits that can increase or decrease resilience to land‐use or climate change. Thus, there are likely bee species that benefit, while others suffer, from changing climate and land use, but few studies have documented taxon‐specific trends. To address these critical knowledge gaps, we analyzed a long‐term dataset of wild bee occurrences from Maryland, Delaware, and Washington DC, USA, examining how different bee genera and functional groups respond to landscape composition, quality, and climate factors. Despite a large body of literature documenting land‐use effects on wild bees, in this study, climate factors emerged as the main drivers of wild‐bee abundance and richness. For wild‐bee communities in spring and summer/fall, temperature and precipitation were more important predictors than landscape composition, landscape quality, or topography. However, relationships varied substantially between wild‐bee genera and functional groups. In the Northeast USA, past trends and future predictions show a changing climate with warmer winters, more intense precipitation in winter and spring, and longer growing seasons with higher maximum temperatures. In almost all of our analyses, these conditions were associated with lower abundance of wild bees. Wild‐bee richness results were more mixed, including neutral and positive relationships with predicted temperature and precipitation patterns. Thus, in this region and undoubtedly more broadly, changing climate poses a significant threat to wild‐bee communities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-12 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7986353/ /pubmed/33433964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15485 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Primary Research Articles
Kammerer, Melanie
Goslee, Sarah C.
Douglas, Margaret R.
Tooker, John F.
Grozinger, Christina M.
Wild bees as winners and losers: Relative impacts of landscape composition, quality, and climate
title Wild bees as winners and losers: Relative impacts of landscape composition, quality, and climate
title_full Wild bees as winners and losers: Relative impacts of landscape composition, quality, and climate
title_fullStr Wild bees as winners and losers: Relative impacts of landscape composition, quality, and climate
title_full_unstemmed Wild bees as winners and losers: Relative impacts of landscape composition, quality, and climate
title_short Wild bees as winners and losers: Relative impacts of landscape composition, quality, and climate
title_sort wild bees as winners and losers: relative impacts of landscape composition, quality, and climate
topic Primary Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15485
work_keys_str_mv AT kammerermelanie wildbeesaswinnersandlosersrelativeimpactsoflandscapecompositionqualityandclimate
AT gosleesarahc wildbeesaswinnersandlosersrelativeimpactsoflandscapecompositionqualityandclimate
AT douglasmargaretr wildbeesaswinnersandlosersrelativeimpactsoflandscapecompositionqualityandclimate
AT tookerjohnf wildbeesaswinnersandlosersrelativeimpactsoflandscapecompositionqualityandclimate
AT grozingerchristinam wildbeesaswinnersandlosersrelativeimpactsoflandscapecompositionqualityandclimate