Cargando…

Short-Term Noise Annoyance and Electrodermal Response as a Function of Sound-Pressure Level, Cognitive Task Load, and Noise Sensitivity

INTRODUCTION: Two aspects of noise annoyance were addressed in the present laboratory study: (1) the disturbance produced by vehicle pass-by noise while engaging in a challenging non-auditory task, and (2) the evaluative response elicited by the same sounds while imagining to relax at home in the ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellermeier, Wolfgang, Kattner, Florian, Klippenstein, Ewald, Kreis, Michael, Marquis-Favre, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380616
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_47_19
_version_ 1783668448110313472
author Ellermeier, Wolfgang
Kattner, Florian
Klippenstein, Ewald
Kreis, Michael
Marquis-Favre, Catherine
author_facet Ellermeier, Wolfgang
Kattner, Florian
Klippenstein, Ewald
Kreis, Michael
Marquis-Favre, Catherine
author_sort Ellermeier, Wolfgang
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Two aspects of noise annoyance were addressed in the present laboratory study: (1) the disturbance produced by vehicle pass-by noise while engaging in a challenging non-auditory task, and (2) the evaluative response elicited by the same sounds while imagining to relax at home in the absence of a primary activity. METHODS AND MATERIAL: In Experiment 1, N = 29 participants were exposed to short (3-6 s) pass-by recordings presented at graded levels between 50 and 70 dB(A). Concurrent with each sound presentation, they performed a visual multiple-object tracking task, and subsequently rated the annoyance of the sounds on a VAS scale. In Experiment 2, N = 30 participants judged the sounds while imagining to relax, without such a cognitive task. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Annoyance was reduced when participants were engaged in the cognitively demanding task, in Experiment 1. Furthermore, when occupied with the task, annoyance slightly, but significantly increased with task load. Across both experiments, the magnitude of simultaneously recorded skin conductance responses in the first 1-4 s after the onset of stimulation increased significantly with sound pressure level. Annoyance ratings tended to be elevated across all sound levels, though significantly only in Experiment 2, in participants classified as noise sensitive based on a 52-item questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that noise annoyance depends on the primary activity the listener is engaged in. They demonstrate that phasic skin conductance responses may serve as an objective correlate of the degree of annoyance experienced. Finally, noise sensitivity is once more shown to augment annoyance ratings in an additive fashion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7986449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79864492021-04-19 Short-Term Noise Annoyance and Electrodermal Response as a Function of Sound-Pressure Level, Cognitive Task Load, and Noise Sensitivity Ellermeier, Wolfgang Kattner, Florian Klippenstein, Ewald Kreis, Michael Marquis-Favre, Catherine Noise Health Original Article INTRODUCTION: Two aspects of noise annoyance were addressed in the present laboratory study: (1) the disturbance produced by vehicle pass-by noise while engaging in a challenging non-auditory task, and (2) the evaluative response elicited by the same sounds while imagining to relax at home in the absence of a primary activity. METHODS AND MATERIAL: In Experiment 1, N = 29 participants were exposed to short (3-6 s) pass-by recordings presented at graded levels between 50 and 70 dB(A). Concurrent with each sound presentation, they performed a visual multiple-object tracking task, and subsequently rated the annoyance of the sounds on a VAS scale. In Experiment 2, N = 30 participants judged the sounds while imagining to relax, without such a cognitive task. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Annoyance was reduced when participants were engaged in the cognitively demanding task, in Experiment 1. Furthermore, when occupied with the task, annoyance slightly, but significantly increased with task load. Across both experiments, the magnitude of simultaneously recorded skin conductance responses in the first 1-4 s after the onset of stimulation increased significantly with sound pressure level. Annoyance ratings tended to be elevated across all sound levels, though significantly only in Experiment 2, in participants classified as noise sensitive based on a 52-item questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that noise annoyance depends on the primary activity the listener is engaged in. They demonstrate that phasic skin conductance responses may serve as an objective correlate of the degree of annoyance experienced. Finally, noise sensitivity is once more shown to augment annoyance ratings in an additive fashion. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7986449/ /pubmed/33380616 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_47_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Noise & Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ellermeier, Wolfgang
Kattner, Florian
Klippenstein, Ewald
Kreis, Michael
Marquis-Favre, Catherine
Short-Term Noise Annoyance and Electrodermal Response as a Function of Sound-Pressure Level, Cognitive Task Load, and Noise Sensitivity
title Short-Term Noise Annoyance and Electrodermal Response as a Function of Sound-Pressure Level, Cognitive Task Load, and Noise Sensitivity
title_full Short-Term Noise Annoyance and Electrodermal Response as a Function of Sound-Pressure Level, Cognitive Task Load, and Noise Sensitivity
title_fullStr Short-Term Noise Annoyance and Electrodermal Response as a Function of Sound-Pressure Level, Cognitive Task Load, and Noise Sensitivity
title_full_unstemmed Short-Term Noise Annoyance and Electrodermal Response as a Function of Sound-Pressure Level, Cognitive Task Load, and Noise Sensitivity
title_short Short-Term Noise Annoyance and Electrodermal Response as a Function of Sound-Pressure Level, Cognitive Task Load, and Noise Sensitivity
title_sort short-term noise annoyance and electrodermal response as a function of sound-pressure level, cognitive task load, and noise sensitivity
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380616
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_47_19
work_keys_str_mv AT ellermeierwolfgang shorttermnoiseannoyanceandelectrodermalresponseasafunctionofsoundpressurelevelcognitivetaskloadandnoisesensitivity
AT kattnerflorian shorttermnoiseannoyanceandelectrodermalresponseasafunctionofsoundpressurelevelcognitivetaskloadandnoisesensitivity
AT klippensteinewald shorttermnoiseannoyanceandelectrodermalresponseasafunctionofsoundpressurelevelcognitivetaskloadandnoisesensitivity
AT kreismichael shorttermnoiseannoyanceandelectrodermalresponseasafunctionofsoundpressurelevelcognitivetaskloadandnoisesensitivity
AT marquisfavrecatherine shorttermnoiseannoyanceandelectrodermalresponseasafunctionofsoundpressurelevelcognitivetaskloadandnoisesensitivity