Cargando…

Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies

It now seems technically feasible to culture human embryos beyond the “fourteen‐day limit,” which has the potential to increase scientific understanding of human development and perhaps improve infertility treatments. The fourteen‐day limit was adopted as a compromise but subsequently has been consi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthews, Kirstin R. W., Iltis, Ana S., Marquez, Nuria Gallego, Wagner, Daniel S., Robert, Jason Scott, de Melo‐Martín, Inmaculada, Bigg, Marieke, Franklin, Sarah, Holm, Soren, Metzler, Ingrid, Molè, Matteo A., Taupitz, Jochen, Testa, Giuseppe, Sugarman, Jeremy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hast.1215
_version_ 1783668476952444928
author Matthews, Kirstin R. W.
Iltis, Ana S.
Marquez, Nuria Gallego
Wagner, Daniel S.
Robert, Jason Scott
de Melo‐Martín, Inmaculada
Bigg, Marieke
Franklin, Sarah
Holm, Soren
Metzler, Ingrid
Molè, Matteo A.
Taupitz, Jochen
Testa, Giuseppe
Sugarman, Jeremy
author_facet Matthews, Kirstin R. W.
Iltis, Ana S.
Marquez, Nuria Gallego
Wagner, Daniel S.
Robert, Jason Scott
de Melo‐Martín, Inmaculada
Bigg, Marieke
Franklin, Sarah
Holm, Soren
Metzler, Ingrid
Molè, Matteo A.
Taupitz, Jochen
Testa, Giuseppe
Sugarman, Jeremy
author_sort Matthews, Kirstin R. W.
collection PubMed
description It now seems technically feasible to culture human embryos beyond the “fourteen‐day limit,” which has the potential to increase scientific understanding of human development and perhaps improve infertility treatments. The fourteen‐day limit was adopted as a compromise but subsequently has been considered an ethical line. Does it remain relevant in light of technological advances permitting embryo maturation beyond it? Should it be changed and, if so, how and why? What justifications would be necessary to expand the limit, particularly given that doing so would violate some people's moral commitments regarding human embryos? Robust stakeholder engagement preceded adoption of the fourteen‐day limit and should arguably be part of efforts to reassess it. Such engagement could also consider the need for enhanced oversight of human embryo research. In the meantime, developing and implementing reliable oversight systems should help foster high‐quality research and public confidence in it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7986614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79866142021-03-25 Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies Matthews, Kirstin R. W. Iltis, Ana S. Marquez, Nuria Gallego Wagner, Daniel S. Robert, Jason Scott de Melo‐Martín, Inmaculada Bigg, Marieke Franklin, Sarah Holm, Soren Metzler, Ingrid Molè, Matteo A. Taupitz, Jochen Testa, Giuseppe Sugarman, Jeremy Hastings Cent Rep Articles It now seems technically feasible to culture human embryos beyond the “fourteen‐day limit,” which has the potential to increase scientific understanding of human development and perhaps improve infertility treatments. The fourteen‐day limit was adopted as a compromise but subsequently has been considered an ethical line. Does it remain relevant in light of technological advances permitting embryo maturation beyond it? Should it be changed and, if so, how and why? What justifications would be necessary to expand the limit, particularly given that doing so would violate some people's moral commitments regarding human embryos? Robust stakeholder engagement preceded adoption of the fourteen‐day limit and should arguably be part of efforts to reassess it. Such engagement could also consider the need for enhanced oversight of human embryo research. In the meantime, developing and implementing reliable oversight systems should help foster high‐quality research and public confidence in it. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7986614/ /pubmed/33630327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hast.1215 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Hastings Center Report published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Hastings Center. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Matthews, Kirstin R. W.
Iltis, Ana S.
Marquez, Nuria Gallego
Wagner, Daniel S.
Robert, Jason Scott
de Melo‐Martín, Inmaculada
Bigg, Marieke
Franklin, Sarah
Holm, Soren
Metzler, Ingrid
Molè, Matteo A.
Taupitz, Jochen
Testa, Giuseppe
Sugarman, Jeremy
Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies
title Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies
title_full Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies
title_fullStr Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies
title_short Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies
title_sort rethinking human embryo research policies
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hast.1215
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewskirstinrw rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies
AT iltisanas rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies
AT marqueznuriagallego rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies
AT wagnerdaniels rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies
AT robertjasonscott rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies
AT demelomartininmaculada rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies
AT biggmarieke rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies
AT franklinsarah rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies
AT holmsoren rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies
AT metzleringrid rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies
AT molematteoa rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies
AT taupitzjochen rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies
AT testagiuseppe rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies
AT sugarmanjeremy rethinkinghumanembryoresearchpolicies