Cargando…

Coupled matrix–matrix and coupled tensor–matrix completion methods for predicting drug–target interactions

Predicting the interactions between drugs and targets plays an important role in the process of new drug discovery, drug repurposing (also known as drug repositioning). There is a need to develop novel and efficient prediction approaches in order to avoid the costly and laborious process of determin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bagherian, Maryam, Kim, Renaid B, Jiang, Cheng, Sartor, Maureen A, Derksen, Harm, Najarian, Kayvan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32186716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaa025
Descripción
Sumario:Predicting the interactions between drugs and targets plays an important role in the process of new drug discovery, drug repurposing (also known as drug repositioning). There is a need to develop novel and efficient prediction approaches in order to avoid the costly and laborious process of determining drug–target interactions (DTIs) based on experiments alone. These computational prediction approaches should be capable of identifying the potential DTIs in a timely manner. Matrix factorization methods have been proven to be the most reliable group of methods. Here, we first propose a matrix factorization-based method termed ‘Coupled Matrix–Matrix Completion’ (CMMC). Next, in order to utilize more comprehensive information provided in different databases and incorporate multiple types of scores for drug–drug similarities and target–target relationship, we then extend CMMC to ‘Coupled Tensor–Matrix Completion’ (CTMC) by considering drug–drug and target–target similarity/interaction tensors. Results: Evaluation on two benchmark datasets, DrugBank and TTD, shows that CTMC outperforms the matrix-factorization-based methods: GRMF, [Formula: see text]-GRMF, NRLMF and NRLMF [Formula: see text]. Based on the evaluation, CMMC and CTMC outperform the above three methods in term of area under the curve, F1 score, sensitivity and specificity in a considerably shorter run time.