Cargando…
Making apples from oranges: Comparing noncollapsible effect estimators and their standard errors after adjustment for different covariate sets
We revisit the well‐known but often misunderstood issue of (non)collapsibility of effect measures in regression models for binary and time‐to‐event outcomes. We describe an existing simple but largely ignored procedure for marginalizing estimates of conditional odds ratios and propose a similar proc...
Autores principales: | Daniel, Rhian, Zhang, Jingjing, Farewell, Daniel |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201900297 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Marginal hazard ratio estimates in joint frailty models for heart failure trials
por: Toenges, Gerrit, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Noncollapsibility and its role in quantifying confounding bias in logistic regression
por: Schuster, Noah A., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A comparison of methods to adjust for continuous covariates in the analysis of randomised trials
por: Kahan, Brennan C., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Should adjustment for covariates be used in prevalence estimations?
por: Li, Wenjun, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Grids are to clouds as apples are to oranges?
Publicado: (2008)