Cargando…

A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort

The maximum tolerated dose of the panobinostat and carfilzomib combination in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) was not reached in our previous dose‐escalation study. We report additional dose levels in the phase I/II, single‐arm, multicenter, standard 3 + 3 dose‐escalation e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berdeja, Jesus G., Gregory, Tara K., Faber, Edward A., Hart, Lowell L., Mace, Joseph R., Arrowsmith, Edward R., Flinn, Ian W., Matous, Jeffrey V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33421178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26088
_version_ 1783668514959130624
author Berdeja, Jesus G.
Gregory, Tara K.
Faber, Edward A.
Hart, Lowell L.
Mace, Joseph R.
Arrowsmith, Edward R.
Flinn, Ian W.
Matous, Jeffrey V.
author_facet Berdeja, Jesus G.
Gregory, Tara K.
Faber, Edward A.
Hart, Lowell L.
Mace, Joseph R.
Arrowsmith, Edward R.
Flinn, Ian W.
Matous, Jeffrey V.
author_sort Berdeja, Jesus G.
collection PubMed
description The maximum tolerated dose of the panobinostat and carfilzomib combination in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) was not reached in our previous dose‐escalation study. We report additional dose levels in the phase I/II, single‐arm, multicenter, standard 3 + 3 dose‐escalation expansion‐cohort study (NCT01496118). Patients with RRMM were treated with panobinostat 30 mg, carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m(2) (N = 3), or panobinostat 20 mg, carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m(2) (N = 33). Treatment cycles lasted 28 days; panobinostat: days 1, 3, 5, 15, 17, 19; carfilzomib: days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16. For dose level 6 (DL 6), median age was 63 years (range, 49–91 years), 60.6% were male, 42.4% were high risk. Patients received a median of two prior therapies (range 1–7); proteasome inhibitors (PI; 100%), immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiD; 78.8%), and stem cell transplant (36.4%); 48.5%, 51.1%, and 24.2% were refractory to prior PI or prior IMiD treatment or both, respectively. Patients completed a median of seven (range 1–40) treatment cycles. Overall response rate (primary endpoint) of evaluable patients in the expansion cohort (N = 32): 84.4%; clinical benefit rate: 90.6%. With a median follow‐up of 26.1 months (range, 0–72.5 months), median (95% CI) progression‐free survival, time‐to‐progression and overall survival of patients was 10.3 (6.1, 13.9), 11.7 (5.6, 14.5), and 44.6 (20.8, N/A) months, respectively. Common adverse events (AEs) included thrombocytopenia (78.8%), nausea (63.6%), fatigue (63.6%), diarrhea (51.5%), and vomiting (51.5%). Seven patients had serious treatment‐related AEs. There was one treatment‐related death. In conclusion, panobinostat plus carfilzomib is an effective steroid‐sparing regimen for RRMM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7986798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79867982021-03-25 A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort Berdeja, Jesus G. Gregory, Tara K. Faber, Edward A. Hart, Lowell L. Mace, Joseph R. Arrowsmith, Edward R. Flinn, Ian W. Matous, Jeffrey V. Am J Hematol Research Articles The maximum tolerated dose of the panobinostat and carfilzomib combination in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) was not reached in our previous dose‐escalation study. We report additional dose levels in the phase I/II, single‐arm, multicenter, standard 3 + 3 dose‐escalation expansion‐cohort study (NCT01496118). Patients with RRMM were treated with panobinostat 30 mg, carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m(2) (N = 3), or panobinostat 20 mg, carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m(2) (N = 33). Treatment cycles lasted 28 days; panobinostat: days 1, 3, 5, 15, 17, 19; carfilzomib: days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16. For dose level 6 (DL 6), median age was 63 years (range, 49–91 years), 60.6% were male, 42.4% were high risk. Patients received a median of two prior therapies (range 1–7); proteasome inhibitors (PI; 100%), immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiD; 78.8%), and stem cell transplant (36.4%); 48.5%, 51.1%, and 24.2% were refractory to prior PI or prior IMiD treatment or both, respectively. Patients completed a median of seven (range 1–40) treatment cycles. Overall response rate (primary endpoint) of evaluable patients in the expansion cohort (N = 32): 84.4%; clinical benefit rate: 90.6%. With a median follow‐up of 26.1 months (range, 0–72.5 months), median (95% CI) progression‐free survival, time‐to‐progression and overall survival of patients was 10.3 (6.1, 13.9), 11.7 (5.6, 14.5), and 44.6 (20.8, N/A) months, respectively. Common adverse events (AEs) included thrombocytopenia (78.8%), nausea (63.6%), fatigue (63.6%), diarrhea (51.5%), and vomiting (51.5%). Seven patients had serious treatment‐related AEs. There was one treatment‐related death. In conclusion, panobinostat plus carfilzomib is an effective steroid‐sparing regimen for RRMM. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-01-28 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7986798/ /pubmed/33421178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26088 Text en © 2021 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Berdeja, Jesus G.
Gregory, Tara K.
Faber, Edward A.
Hart, Lowell L.
Mace, Joseph R.
Arrowsmith, Edward R.
Flinn, Ian W.
Matous, Jeffrey V.
A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort
title A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort
title_full A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort
title_fullStr A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort
title_full_unstemmed A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort
title_short A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort
title_sort phase i/ii study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33421178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26088
work_keys_str_mv AT berdejajesusg aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT gregorytarak aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT faberedwarda aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT hartlowelll aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT macejosephr aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT arrowsmithedwardr aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT flinnianw aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT matousjeffreyv aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT berdejajesusg phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT gregorytarak phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT faberedwarda phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT hartlowelll phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT macejosephr phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT arrowsmithedwardr phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT flinnianw phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort
AT matousjeffreyv phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort