Cargando…
A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort
The maximum tolerated dose of the panobinostat and carfilzomib combination in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) was not reached in our previous dose‐escalation study. We report additional dose levels in the phase I/II, single‐arm, multicenter, standard 3 + 3 dose‐escalation e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33421178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26088 |
_version_ | 1783668514959130624 |
---|---|
author | Berdeja, Jesus G. Gregory, Tara K. Faber, Edward A. Hart, Lowell L. Mace, Joseph R. Arrowsmith, Edward R. Flinn, Ian W. Matous, Jeffrey V. |
author_facet | Berdeja, Jesus G. Gregory, Tara K. Faber, Edward A. Hart, Lowell L. Mace, Joseph R. Arrowsmith, Edward R. Flinn, Ian W. Matous, Jeffrey V. |
author_sort | Berdeja, Jesus G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The maximum tolerated dose of the panobinostat and carfilzomib combination in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) was not reached in our previous dose‐escalation study. We report additional dose levels in the phase I/II, single‐arm, multicenter, standard 3 + 3 dose‐escalation expansion‐cohort study (NCT01496118). Patients with RRMM were treated with panobinostat 30 mg, carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m(2) (N = 3), or panobinostat 20 mg, carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m(2) (N = 33). Treatment cycles lasted 28 days; panobinostat: days 1, 3, 5, 15, 17, 19; carfilzomib: days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16. For dose level 6 (DL 6), median age was 63 years (range, 49–91 years), 60.6% were male, 42.4% were high risk. Patients received a median of two prior therapies (range 1–7); proteasome inhibitors (PI; 100%), immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiD; 78.8%), and stem cell transplant (36.4%); 48.5%, 51.1%, and 24.2% were refractory to prior PI or prior IMiD treatment or both, respectively. Patients completed a median of seven (range 1–40) treatment cycles. Overall response rate (primary endpoint) of evaluable patients in the expansion cohort (N = 32): 84.4%; clinical benefit rate: 90.6%. With a median follow‐up of 26.1 months (range, 0–72.5 months), median (95% CI) progression‐free survival, time‐to‐progression and overall survival of patients was 10.3 (6.1, 13.9), 11.7 (5.6, 14.5), and 44.6 (20.8, N/A) months, respectively. Common adverse events (AEs) included thrombocytopenia (78.8%), nausea (63.6%), fatigue (63.6%), diarrhea (51.5%), and vomiting (51.5%). Seven patients had serious treatment‐related AEs. There was one treatment‐related death. In conclusion, panobinostat plus carfilzomib is an effective steroid‐sparing regimen for RRMM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7986798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79867982021-03-25 A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort Berdeja, Jesus G. Gregory, Tara K. Faber, Edward A. Hart, Lowell L. Mace, Joseph R. Arrowsmith, Edward R. Flinn, Ian W. Matous, Jeffrey V. Am J Hematol Research Articles The maximum tolerated dose of the panobinostat and carfilzomib combination in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) was not reached in our previous dose‐escalation study. We report additional dose levels in the phase I/II, single‐arm, multicenter, standard 3 + 3 dose‐escalation expansion‐cohort study (NCT01496118). Patients with RRMM were treated with panobinostat 30 mg, carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m(2) (N = 3), or panobinostat 20 mg, carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m(2) (N = 33). Treatment cycles lasted 28 days; panobinostat: days 1, 3, 5, 15, 17, 19; carfilzomib: days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16. For dose level 6 (DL 6), median age was 63 years (range, 49–91 years), 60.6% were male, 42.4% were high risk. Patients received a median of two prior therapies (range 1–7); proteasome inhibitors (PI; 100%), immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiD; 78.8%), and stem cell transplant (36.4%); 48.5%, 51.1%, and 24.2% were refractory to prior PI or prior IMiD treatment or both, respectively. Patients completed a median of seven (range 1–40) treatment cycles. Overall response rate (primary endpoint) of evaluable patients in the expansion cohort (N = 32): 84.4%; clinical benefit rate: 90.6%. With a median follow‐up of 26.1 months (range, 0–72.5 months), median (95% CI) progression‐free survival, time‐to‐progression and overall survival of patients was 10.3 (6.1, 13.9), 11.7 (5.6, 14.5), and 44.6 (20.8, N/A) months, respectively. Common adverse events (AEs) included thrombocytopenia (78.8%), nausea (63.6%), fatigue (63.6%), diarrhea (51.5%), and vomiting (51.5%). Seven patients had serious treatment‐related AEs. There was one treatment‐related death. In conclusion, panobinostat plus carfilzomib is an effective steroid‐sparing regimen for RRMM. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-01-28 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7986798/ /pubmed/33421178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26088 Text en © 2021 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Berdeja, Jesus G. Gregory, Tara K. Faber, Edward A. Hart, Lowell L. Mace, Joseph R. Arrowsmith, Edward R. Flinn, Ian W. Matous, Jeffrey V. A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort |
title | A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort |
title_full | A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort |
title_fullStr | A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort |
title_short | A phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort |
title_sort | phase i/ii study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: final analysis of second dose‐expansion cohort |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33421178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berdejajesusg aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT gregorytarak aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT faberedwarda aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT hartlowelll aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT macejosephr aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT arrowsmithedwardr aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT flinnianw aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT matousjeffreyv aphaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT berdejajesusg phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT gregorytarak phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT faberedwarda phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT hartlowelll phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT macejosephr phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT arrowsmithedwardr phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT flinnianw phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort AT matousjeffreyv phaseiiistudyofthecombinationofpanobinostatandcarfilzomibinpatientswithrelapsedorrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomafinalanalysisofseconddoseexpansioncohort |