Cargando…
Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies
Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) has been proposed as a sustainable alternative to produce valuable chemicals by reducing the global warming impact and depletion of fossil resources. To guarantee that CCU processes have environmental advantages over conventional production processes, thorough an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202002126 |
_version_ | 1783668518887096320 |
---|---|
author | Garcia‐Garcia, Guillermo Fernandez, Marta Cruz Armstrong, Katy Woolass, Steven Styring, Peter |
author_facet | Garcia‐Garcia, Guillermo Fernandez, Marta Cruz Armstrong, Katy Woolass, Steven Styring, Peter |
author_sort | Garcia‐Garcia, Guillermo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) has been proposed as a sustainable alternative to produce valuable chemicals by reducing the global warming impact and depletion of fossil resources. To guarantee that CCU processes have environmental advantages over conventional production processes, thorough and systematic environmental impact analyses must be performed. Life‐Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a robust methodology that can be used to fulfil this aim. In this context, this article aims to review the life‐cycle environmental impacts of several CCU processes, focusing on the production of methanol, methane, dimethyl ether, dimethyl carbonate, propane and propene. A systematic literature review is used to collect relevant published evidence of the environmental impacts and potential benefits. An analysis of such information shows that CCU generally provides a reduction of environmental impacts, notably global warming/climate change, compared to conventional manufacturing processes of the same product. To achieve such environmental improvements, renewable energy must be used, particularly to produce hydrogen from water electrolysis. Importantly, different methodological choices are identified that are being used in the LCA studies, making results not comparable. There is a clear need to harmonize LCA methods for the analyses of CCU systems, and more importantly, to document and justify such methodological choices in the LCA report. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7986834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79868342021-03-25 Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies Garcia‐Garcia, Guillermo Fernandez, Marta Cruz Armstrong, Katy Woolass, Steven Styring, Peter ChemSusChem Reviews Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) has been proposed as a sustainable alternative to produce valuable chemicals by reducing the global warming impact and depletion of fossil resources. To guarantee that CCU processes have environmental advantages over conventional production processes, thorough and systematic environmental impact analyses must be performed. Life‐Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a robust methodology that can be used to fulfil this aim. In this context, this article aims to review the life‐cycle environmental impacts of several CCU processes, focusing on the production of methanol, methane, dimethyl ether, dimethyl carbonate, propane and propene. A systematic literature review is used to collect relevant published evidence of the environmental impacts and potential benefits. An analysis of such information shows that CCU generally provides a reduction of environmental impacts, notably global warming/climate change, compared to conventional manufacturing processes of the same product. To achieve such environmental improvements, renewable energy must be used, particularly to produce hydrogen from water electrolysis. Importantly, different methodological choices are identified that are being used in the LCA studies, making results not comparable. There is a clear need to harmonize LCA methods for the analyses of CCU systems, and more importantly, to document and justify such methodological choices in the LCA report. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-05 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7986834/ /pubmed/33314601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202002126 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ChemSusChem published by Wiley-VCH GmbH This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Garcia‐Garcia, Guillermo Fernandez, Marta Cruz Armstrong, Katy Woolass, Steven Styring, Peter Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies |
title | Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies |
title_full | Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies |
title_fullStr | Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies |
title_full_unstemmed | Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies |
title_short | Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies |
title_sort | analytical review of life‐cycle environmental impacts of carbon capture and utilization technologies |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202002126 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciagarciaguillermo analyticalreviewoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactsofcarboncaptureandutilizationtechnologies AT fernandezmartacruz analyticalreviewoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactsofcarboncaptureandutilizationtechnologies AT armstrongkaty analyticalreviewoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactsofcarboncaptureandutilizationtechnologies AT woolasssteven analyticalreviewoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactsofcarboncaptureandutilizationtechnologies AT styringpeter analyticalreviewoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactsofcarboncaptureandutilizationtechnologies |