Cargando…

Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies

Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) has been proposed as a sustainable alternative to produce valuable chemicals by reducing the global warming impact and depletion of fossil resources. To guarantee that CCU processes have environmental advantages over conventional production processes, thorough an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia‐Garcia, Guillermo, Fernandez, Marta Cruz, Armstrong, Katy, Woolass, Steven, Styring, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202002126
_version_ 1783668518887096320
author Garcia‐Garcia, Guillermo
Fernandez, Marta Cruz
Armstrong, Katy
Woolass, Steven
Styring, Peter
author_facet Garcia‐Garcia, Guillermo
Fernandez, Marta Cruz
Armstrong, Katy
Woolass, Steven
Styring, Peter
author_sort Garcia‐Garcia, Guillermo
collection PubMed
description Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) has been proposed as a sustainable alternative to produce valuable chemicals by reducing the global warming impact and depletion of fossil resources. To guarantee that CCU processes have environmental advantages over conventional production processes, thorough and systematic environmental impact analyses must be performed. Life‐Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a robust methodology that can be used to fulfil this aim. In this context, this article aims to review the life‐cycle environmental impacts of several CCU processes, focusing on the production of methanol, methane, dimethyl ether, dimethyl carbonate, propane and propene. A systematic literature review is used to collect relevant published evidence of the environmental impacts and potential benefits. An analysis of such information shows that CCU generally provides a reduction of environmental impacts, notably global warming/climate change, compared to conventional manufacturing processes of the same product. To achieve such environmental improvements, renewable energy must be used, particularly to produce hydrogen from water electrolysis. Importantly, different methodological choices are identified that are being used in the LCA studies, making results not comparable. There is a clear need to harmonize LCA methods for the analyses of CCU systems, and more importantly, to document and justify such methodological choices in the LCA report.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7986834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79868342021-03-25 Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies Garcia‐Garcia, Guillermo Fernandez, Marta Cruz Armstrong, Katy Woolass, Steven Styring, Peter ChemSusChem Reviews Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) has been proposed as a sustainable alternative to produce valuable chemicals by reducing the global warming impact and depletion of fossil resources. To guarantee that CCU processes have environmental advantages over conventional production processes, thorough and systematic environmental impact analyses must be performed. Life‐Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a robust methodology that can be used to fulfil this aim. In this context, this article aims to review the life‐cycle environmental impacts of several CCU processes, focusing on the production of methanol, methane, dimethyl ether, dimethyl carbonate, propane and propene. A systematic literature review is used to collect relevant published evidence of the environmental impacts and potential benefits. An analysis of such information shows that CCU generally provides a reduction of environmental impacts, notably global warming/climate change, compared to conventional manufacturing processes of the same product. To achieve such environmental improvements, renewable energy must be used, particularly to produce hydrogen from water electrolysis. Importantly, different methodological choices are identified that are being used in the LCA studies, making results not comparable. There is a clear need to harmonize LCA methods for the analyses of CCU systems, and more importantly, to document and justify such methodological choices in the LCA report. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-05 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7986834/ /pubmed/33314601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202002126 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ChemSusChem published by Wiley-VCH GmbH This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Garcia‐Garcia, Guillermo
Fernandez, Marta Cruz
Armstrong, Katy
Woolass, Steven
Styring, Peter
Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies
title Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies
title_full Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies
title_fullStr Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies
title_full_unstemmed Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies
title_short Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies
title_sort analytical review of life‐cycle environmental impacts of carbon capture and utilization technologies
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202002126
work_keys_str_mv AT garciagarciaguillermo analyticalreviewoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactsofcarboncaptureandutilizationtechnologies
AT fernandezmartacruz analyticalreviewoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactsofcarboncaptureandutilizationtechnologies
AT armstrongkaty analyticalreviewoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactsofcarboncaptureandutilizationtechnologies
AT woolasssteven analyticalreviewoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactsofcarboncaptureandutilizationtechnologies
AT styringpeter analyticalreviewoflifecycleenvironmentalimpactsofcarboncaptureandutilizationtechnologies