Cargando…

An Insight into Non‐Covalent Interactions on the Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane Scaffold

Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane (BCP) is studied extensively as a bioisosteric component of drugs. Not found in nature, this molecular unit approximates the distance of a para‐disubstituted benzene which is replaced in medicines as a method of improving treatments. Predicting interactions of these drugs with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grover, Nitika, Flanagan, Keith J., Trujillo, Cristina, Kingsbury, Christopher J., Senge, Mathias O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.202001564
_version_ 1783668521206546432
author Grover, Nitika
Flanagan, Keith J.
Trujillo, Cristina
Kingsbury, Christopher J.
Senge, Mathias O.
author_facet Grover, Nitika
Flanagan, Keith J.
Trujillo, Cristina
Kingsbury, Christopher J.
Senge, Mathias O.
author_sort Grover, Nitika
collection PubMed
description Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane (BCP) is studied extensively as a bioisosteric component of drugs. Not found in nature, this molecular unit approximates the distance of a para‐disubstituted benzene which is replaced in medicines as a method of improving treatments. Predicting interactions of these drugs with specific active sites requires knowledge of the non‐covalent interactions engaged by this subunit. Structure determinations and computational analysis (Hirshfeld analysis, 2D fingerprint plots, DFT) of seven BCP derivatives chosen to probe specific and directional interactions. X‐ray analysis revealed the presence of various non‐covalent interactions including I ⋅⋅⋅ I, I ⋅⋅⋅ N, N−H ⋅⋅⋅ O, C−H ⋅⋅⋅ O, and H−C ⋅⋅⋅ H−C contacts. The preference of halogen bonding (I ⋅⋅⋅ I or I ⋅⋅⋅ N) in BCP 1–4 strictly depends upon the electronic nature and angle between bridgehead substituents. The transannular distance in co‐crystals 2 and 4 was longer as compared to monomers 1 and 3. Stronger N−H ⋅⋅⋅ O and weaker C−H ⋅⋅⋅ O contacts were observed for BCP 5 while the O ⋅⋅⋅ H interaction was a prominent contact for BCP 6. The presence of 3D BCP units prevented the π ⋅⋅⋅ π stacking between phenyl rings in 3, 4, and 7. The BCP skeleton was often rotationally averaged, indicating fewer interactions compared to bridgehead functional groups. Using DFT analysis, geometries were optimized and molecular electrostatic potentials were calculated on the BCP surfaces. These interaction profiles may be useful for designing BCP analogs of drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7986844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79868442021-03-25 An Insight into Non‐Covalent Interactions on the Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane Scaffold Grover, Nitika Flanagan, Keith J. Trujillo, Cristina Kingsbury, Christopher J. Senge, Mathias O. European J Org Chem Full Papers Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane (BCP) is studied extensively as a bioisosteric component of drugs. Not found in nature, this molecular unit approximates the distance of a para‐disubstituted benzene which is replaced in medicines as a method of improving treatments. Predicting interactions of these drugs with specific active sites requires knowledge of the non‐covalent interactions engaged by this subunit. Structure determinations and computational analysis (Hirshfeld analysis, 2D fingerprint plots, DFT) of seven BCP derivatives chosen to probe specific and directional interactions. X‐ray analysis revealed the presence of various non‐covalent interactions including I ⋅⋅⋅ I, I ⋅⋅⋅ N, N−H ⋅⋅⋅ O, C−H ⋅⋅⋅ O, and H−C ⋅⋅⋅ H−C contacts. The preference of halogen bonding (I ⋅⋅⋅ I or I ⋅⋅⋅ N) in BCP 1–4 strictly depends upon the electronic nature and angle between bridgehead substituents. The transannular distance in co‐crystals 2 and 4 was longer as compared to monomers 1 and 3. Stronger N−H ⋅⋅⋅ O and weaker C−H ⋅⋅⋅ O contacts were observed for BCP 5 while the O ⋅⋅⋅ H interaction was a prominent contact for BCP 6. The presence of 3D BCP units prevented the π ⋅⋅⋅ π stacking between phenyl rings in 3, 4, and 7. The BCP skeleton was often rotationally averaged, indicating fewer interactions compared to bridgehead functional groups. Using DFT analysis, geometries were optimized and molecular electrostatic potentials were calculated on the BCP surfaces. These interaction profiles may be useful for designing BCP analogs of drugs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-22 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7986844/ /pubmed/33776556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.202001564 Text en © 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Organic Chemistry published by Wiley-VCH GmbH This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Grover, Nitika
Flanagan, Keith J.
Trujillo, Cristina
Kingsbury, Christopher J.
Senge, Mathias O.
An Insight into Non‐Covalent Interactions on the Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane Scaffold
title An Insight into Non‐Covalent Interactions on the Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane Scaffold
title_full An Insight into Non‐Covalent Interactions on the Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane Scaffold
title_fullStr An Insight into Non‐Covalent Interactions on the Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane Scaffold
title_full_unstemmed An Insight into Non‐Covalent Interactions on the Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane Scaffold
title_short An Insight into Non‐Covalent Interactions on the Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane Scaffold
title_sort insight into non‐covalent interactions on the bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane scaffold
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.202001564
work_keys_str_mv AT grovernitika aninsightintononcovalentinteractionsonthebicyclo111pentanescaffold
AT flanagankeithj aninsightintononcovalentinteractionsonthebicyclo111pentanescaffold
AT trujillocristina aninsightintononcovalentinteractionsonthebicyclo111pentanescaffold
AT kingsburychristopherj aninsightintononcovalentinteractionsonthebicyclo111pentanescaffold
AT sengemathiaso aninsightintononcovalentinteractionsonthebicyclo111pentanescaffold
AT grovernitika insightintononcovalentinteractionsonthebicyclo111pentanescaffold
AT flanagankeithj insightintononcovalentinteractionsonthebicyclo111pentanescaffold
AT trujillocristina insightintononcovalentinteractionsonthebicyclo111pentanescaffold
AT kingsburychristopherj insightintononcovalentinteractionsonthebicyclo111pentanescaffold
AT sengemathiaso insightintononcovalentinteractionsonthebicyclo111pentanescaffold