Cargando…

Dispersal syndromes drive the formation of biogeographical regions, illustrated by the case of Wallace’s Line

AIM: Biogeographical regions (realms) reflect patterns of co‐distributed species (biotas) across space. Their boundaries are set by dispersal barriers and difficulties of establishment in new locations. We extend new methods to assess these two contributions by quantifying the degree to which realms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, Alexander E., Dey, Kushal K., Stephens, Matthew, Price, Trevor D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geb.13250
_version_ 1783668524511657984
author White, Alexander E.
Dey, Kushal K.
Stephens, Matthew
Price, Trevor D.
author_facet White, Alexander E.
Dey, Kushal K.
Stephens, Matthew
Price, Trevor D.
author_sort White, Alexander E.
collection PubMed
description AIM: Biogeographical regions (realms) reflect patterns of co‐distributed species (biotas) across space. Their boundaries are set by dispersal barriers and difficulties of establishment in new locations. We extend new methods to assess these two contributions by quantifying the degree to which realms intergrade across geographical space and the contributions of individual species to the delineation of those realms. As our example, we focus on Wallace’s Line, the most enigmatic partitioning of the world’s faunas, where climate is thought to have little effect and the majority of dispersal barriers are short water gaps. LOCATION: Indo‐Pacific. TIME PERIOD: Present day. MAJOR TAXA STUDIED: Birds and mammals. METHODS: Terrestrial bird and mammal assemblages were established in 1‐degree map cells using range maps. Assemblage structure was modelled using latent Dirichlet allocation, a continuous clustering method that simultaneously establishes the likely partitioning of species into biotas and the contribution of biotas to each map cell. Phylogenetic trees were used to assess the contribution of deep historical processes. Spatial segregation between biotas was evaluated across time and space in comparison with numerous hard realm boundaries drawn by various workers. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the strong turnover between biotas coincides with the north‐western extent of the region not connected to the mainland during the Pleistocene, although the Philippines contains mixed contributions. At deeper taxonomic levels, Sulawesi and the Philippines shift to primarily Asian affinities, resulting from transgressions of a few Asian‐derived lineages across the line. The partitioning of biotas sometimes produces fragmented regions that reflect habitat. Differences in partitions between birds and mammals reflect differences in dispersal ability. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Permanent water barriers have selected for a dispersive archipelago fauna, excluded by an incumbent continental fauna on the Sunda shelf. Deep history, such as plate movements, is relatively unimportant in setting boundaries. The analysis implies a temporally dynamic interaction between a species’ intrinsic dispersal ability, physiographic barriers, and recent climate change in the genesis of Earth’s biotas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7986858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79868582021-03-25 Dispersal syndromes drive the formation of biogeographical regions, illustrated by the case of Wallace’s Line White, Alexander E. Dey, Kushal K. Stephens, Matthew Price, Trevor D. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Research Papers AIM: Biogeographical regions (realms) reflect patterns of co‐distributed species (biotas) across space. Their boundaries are set by dispersal barriers and difficulties of establishment in new locations. We extend new methods to assess these two contributions by quantifying the degree to which realms intergrade across geographical space and the contributions of individual species to the delineation of those realms. As our example, we focus on Wallace’s Line, the most enigmatic partitioning of the world’s faunas, where climate is thought to have little effect and the majority of dispersal barriers are short water gaps. LOCATION: Indo‐Pacific. TIME PERIOD: Present day. MAJOR TAXA STUDIED: Birds and mammals. METHODS: Terrestrial bird and mammal assemblages were established in 1‐degree map cells using range maps. Assemblage structure was modelled using latent Dirichlet allocation, a continuous clustering method that simultaneously establishes the likely partitioning of species into biotas and the contribution of biotas to each map cell. Phylogenetic trees were used to assess the contribution of deep historical processes. Spatial segregation between biotas was evaluated across time and space in comparison with numerous hard realm boundaries drawn by various workers. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the strong turnover between biotas coincides with the north‐western extent of the region not connected to the mainland during the Pleistocene, although the Philippines contains mixed contributions. At deeper taxonomic levels, Sulawesi and the Philippines shift to primarily Asian affinities, resulting from transgressions of a few Asian‐derived lineages across the line. The partitioning of biotas sometimes produces fragmented regions that reflect habitat. Differences in partitions between birds and mammals reflect differences in dispersal ability. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Permanent water barriers have selected for a dispersive archipelago fauna, excluded by an incumbent continental fauna on the Sunda shelf. Deep history, such as plate movements, is relatively unimportant in setting boundaries. The analysis implies a temporally dynamic interaction between a species’ intrinsic dispersal ability, physiographic barriers, and recent climate change in the genesis of Earth’s biotas. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-06 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7986858/ /pubmed/33776580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geb.13250 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Global Ecology and Biogeography published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
White, Alexander E.
Dey, Kushal K.
Stephens, Matthew
Price, Trevor D.
Dispersal syndromes drive the formation of biogeographical regions, illustrated by the case of Wallace’s Line
title Dispersal syndromes drive the formation of biogeographical regions, illustrated by the case of Wallace’s Line
title_full Dispersal syndromes drive the formation of biogeographical regions, illustrated by the case of Wallace’s Line
title_fullStr Dispersal syndromes drive the formation of biogeographical regions, illustrated by the case of Wallace’s Line
title_full_unstemmed Dispersal syndromes drive the formation of biogeographical regions, illustrated by the case of Wallace’s Line
title_short Dispersal syndromes drive the formation of biogeographical regions, illustrated by the case of Wallace’s Line
title_sort dispersal syndromes drive the formation of biogeographical regions, illustrated by the case of wallace’s line
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7986858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geb.13250
work_keys_str_mv AT whitealexandere dispersalsyndromesdrivetheformationofbiogeographicalregionsillustratedbythecaseofwallacesline
AT deykushalk dispersalsyndromesdrivetheformationofbiogeographicalregionsillustratedbythecaseofwallacesline
AT stephensmatthew dispersalsyndromesdrivetheformationofbiogeographicalregionsillustratedbythecaseofwallacesline
AT pricetrevord dispersalsyndromesdrivetheformationofbiogeographicalregionsillustratedbythecaseofwallacesline