Cargando…
Approaches to the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension: Non-Invasive or Invasive Tests?
Portal hypertension is the main driver of complications in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) and is defined by values of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement (HVPG) >5 mmHg. Values of HVPG ≥10 mmHg determine the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSP...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776492 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S278077 |
_version_ | 1783668584900198400 |
---|---|
author | Dajti, Elton Alemanni, Luigina Vanessa Marasco, Giovanni Montagnani, Marco Azzaroli, Francesco |
author_facet | Dajti, Elton Alemanni, Luigina Vanessa Marasco, Giovanni Montagnani, Marco Azzaroli, Francesco |
author_sort | Dajti, Elton |
collection | PubMed |
description | Portal hypertension is the main driver of complications in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) and is defined by values of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement (HVPG) >5 mmHg. Values of HVPG ≥10 mmHg determine the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), the main predictor of the risk of variceal bleeding, hepatic decompensation, and mortality. However, its measurement is invasive and requires high expertise, so its routine use outside third level centers or clinical trials is limited. In the last decades, several non-invasive tests (NITs) have been developed and validated for the diagnosis of portal hypertension. Among these, liver (LSM) and spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) are the most promising tools available, as they have been proven accurate to predict CSPH, high-risk esophageal varices, decompensation, and mortality in patients with ACLD. In the last Baveno VI Consensus proceedings, LSM evaluation was recommended for the first time for diagnosis of CSPH (LSM >20-25 kPa) and the screening of patients with a low probability of having high-risk varices (LSM <20 kPa and platelet count >150.000/mm(3)). In this review, we aimed to summarize the growing evidence supporting the use of non-invasive tests for the evaluation of portal hypertension in patients with chronic liver disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7987277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79872772021-03-25 Approaches to the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension: Non-Invasive or Invasive Tests? Dajti, Elton Alemanni, Luigina Vanessa Marasco, Giovanni Montagnani, Marco Azzaroli, Francesco Hepat Med Review Portal hypertension is the main driver of complications in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) and is defined by values of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement (HVPG) >5 mmHg. Values of HVPG ≥10 mmHg determine the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), the main predictor of the risk of variceal bleeding, hepatic decompensation, and mortality. However, its measurement is invasive and requires high expertise, so its routine use outside third level centers or clinical trials is limited. In the last decades, several non-invasive tests (NITs) have been developed and validated for the diagnosis of portal hypertension. Among these, liver (LSM) and spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) are the most promising tools available, as they have been proven accurate to predict CSPH, high-risk esophageal varices, decompensation, and mortality in patients with ACLD. In the last Baveno VI Consensus proceedings, LSM evaluation was recommended for the first time for diagnosis of CSPH (LSM >20-25 kPa) and the screening of patients with a low probability of having high-risk varices (LSM <20 kPa and platelet count >150.000/mm(3)). In this review, we aimed to summarize the growing evidence supporting the use of non-invasive tests for the evaluation of portal hypertension in patients with chronic liver disease. Dove 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7987277/ /pubmed/33776492 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S278077 Text en © 2021 Dajti et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Dajti, Elton Alemanni, Luigina Vanessa Marasco, Giovanni Montagnani, Marco Azzaroli, Francesco Approaches to the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension: Non-Invasive or Invasive Tests? |
title | Approaches to the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension: Non-Invasive or Invasive Tests? |
title_full | Approaches to the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension: Non-Invasive or Invasive Tests? |
title_fullStr | Approaches to the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension: Non-Invasive or Invasive Tests? |
title_full_unstemmed | Approaches to the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension: Non-Invasive or Invasive Tests? |
title_short | Approaches to the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension: Non-Invasive or Invasive Tests? |
title_sort | approaches to the diagnosis of portal hypertension: non-invasive or invasive tests? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776492 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S278077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dajtielton approachestothediagnosisofportalhypertensionnoninvasiveorinvasivetests AT alemanniluiginavanessa approachestothediagnosisofportalhypertensionnoninvasiveorinvasivetests AT marascogiovanni approachestothediagnosisofportalhypertensionnoninvasiveorinvasivetests AT montagnanimarco approachestothediagnosisofportalhypertensionnoninvasiveorinvasivetests AT azzarolifrancesco approachestothediagnosisofportalhypertensionnoninvasiveorinvasivetests |