Cargando…
The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms
PURPOSE: Build machine learning models for predicting pressure ulcer nursing adverse event, and find an optimal model that predicts the occurrence of pressure ulcer accurately. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively enrolled 5814 patients, of which 1673 suffer from pressure ulcer events. Support vect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776495 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S297838 |
_version_ | 1783668596291928064 |
---|---|
author | Song, Jie Gao, Yuan Yin, Pengbin Li, Yi Li, Yang Zhang, Jie Su, Qingqing Fu, Xiaojie Pi, Hongying |
author_facet | Song, Jie Gao, Yuan Yin, Pengbin Li, Yi Li, Yang Zhang, Jie Su, Qingqing Fu, Xiaojie Pi, Hongying |
author_sort | Song, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Build machine learning models for predicting pressure ulcer nursing adverse event, and find an optimal model that predicts the occurrence of pressure ulcer accurately. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively enrolled 5814 patients, of which 1673 suffer from pressure ulcer events. Support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were used to construct the pressure ulcer prediction models, respectively. A total of 19 variables are included, and the importance of screening variables is evaluated. Meanwhile, the performance of the prediction models is evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The experimental results show that the four pressure ulcer prediction models all achieve good performance. Also, the AUC values of the four models are all greater than 0.95. Besides, the comparison of the four models indicates that RF model achieves a higher accuracy for the prediction of pressure ulcer. CONCLUSION: This research verifies the feasibility of developing a management system for predicting nursing adverse event based on big data technology and machine learning technology. The random forest and decision tree model are more suitable for constructing a pressure ulcer prediction model. This study provides a reference for future pressure ulcer risk warning based on big data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7987326 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79873262021-03-25 The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms Song, Jie Gao, Yuan Yin, Pengbin Li, Yi Li, Yang Zhang, Jie Su, Qingqing Fu, Xiaojie Pi, Hongying Risk Manag Healthc Policy Original Research PURPOSE: Build machine learning models for predicting pressure ulcer nursing adverse event, and find an optimal model that predicts the occurrence of pressure ulcer accurately. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively enrolled 5814 patients, of which 1673 suffer from pressure ulcer events. Support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were used to construct the pressure ulcer prediction models, respectively. A total of 19 variables are included, and the importance of screening variables is evaluated. Meanwhile, the performance of the prediction models is evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The experimental results show that the four pressure ulcer prediction models all achieve good performance. Also, the AUC values of the four models are all greater than 0.95. Besides, the comparison of the four models indicates that RF model achieves a higher accuracy for the prediction of pressure ulcer. CONCLUSION: This research verifies the feasibility of developing a management system for predicting nursing adverse event based on big data technology and machine learning technology. The random forest and decision tree model are more suitable for constructing a pressure ulcer prediction model. This study provides a reference for future pressure ulcer risk warning based on big data. Dove 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7987326/ /pubmed/33776495 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S297838 Text en © 2021 Song et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Song, Jie Gao, Yuan Yin, Pengbin Li, Yi Li, Yang Zhang, Jie Su, Qingqing Fu, Xiaojie Pi, Hongying The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms |
title | The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms |
title_full | The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms |
title_fullStr | The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms |
title_short | The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms |
title_sort | random forest model has the best accuracy among the four pressure ulcer prediction models using machine learning algorithms |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776495 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S297838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songjie therandomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT gaoyuan therandomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT yinpengbin therandomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT liyi therandomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT liyang therandomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT zhangjie therandomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT suqingqing therandomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT fuxiaojie therandomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT pihongying therandomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT songjie randomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT gaoyuan randomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT yinpengbin randomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT liyi randomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT liyang randomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT zhangjie randomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT suqingqing randomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT fuxiaojie randomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT pihongying randomforestmodelhasthebestaccuracyamongthefourpressureulcerpredictionmodelsusingmachinelearningalgorithms |