Cargando…

Evaluation of a Motion Correction Algorithm for C-Arm Computed Tomography Acquired During Transarterial Chemoembolization

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility of a motion correction 3D reconstruction prototype technique for C-arm computed tomography (CACT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 65 consecutive CACTs acquired during transarterial chemoembolization of 54 patients (47 m,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becker, Lena S., Gutberlet, Marcel, Maschke, Sabine K., Werncke, Thomas, Dewald, Cornelia L. A., von Falck, Christian, Vogel, Arndt, Kloeckner, Roman, Meyer, Bernhard C., Wacker, Frank, Hinrichs, Jan B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33280058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02729-6
_version_ 1783668663207854080
author Becker, Lena S.
Gutberlet, Marcel
Maschke, Sabine K.
Werncke, Thomas
Dewald, Cornelia L. A.
von Falck, Christian
Vogel, Arndt
Kloeckner, Roman
Meyer, Bernhard C.
Wacker, Frank
Hinrichs, Jan B.
author_facet Becker, Lena S.
Gutberlet, Marcel
Maschke, Sabine K.
Werncke, Thomas
Dewald, Cornelia L. A.
von Falck, Christian
Vogel, Arndt
Kloeckner, Roman
Meyer, Bernhard C.
Wacker, Frank
Hinrichs, Jan B.
author_sort Becker, Lena S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility of a motion correction 3D reconstruction prototype technique for C-arm computed tomography (CACT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 65 consecutive CACTs acquired during transarterial chemoembolization of 54 patients (47 m,7f; 67 ± 11.3 years). All original raw datasets (CACT(Org)) underwent reconstruction with and without volume punching of high-contrast objects using a 3D image reconstruction software to compensate for motion (CACT(MC_bone);CACT(MC_no bone)). Subsequently, the effect on image quality (IQ) was evaluated using objective (image sharpness metric) and subjective criteria. Subjective criteria were defined by vessel geometry, overall IQ, delineation of tumor feeders, the presence of foreign material-induced artifacts and need for additional imaging, assessed by two independent readers on a 3-(vessel geometry and overall IQ) or 2-point scale, respectively. Friedman rank-sum test and post hoc analysis in form of pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test were computed and inter-observer agreement analyzed using kappa test. RESULTS: Objective IQ as defined by an image sharpness metric, increased from 273.5 ± 28 (CACT(Org)) to 328.5 ± 55.1 (CACT(MC_bone)) and 331 ± 57.8 (CACT(MC_no bone); all p < 0.0001). These results could largely be confirmed by the subjective analysis, which demonstrated predominantly good and moderate inter-observer agreement, with best agreement for CACT(MC_no bone) in all categories (e.g., vessel geometry: CACT(Org): κ = 0.51, CACT(MC_bone): κ = 0.42, CACT(MC_no bone): κ = 0.69). CONCLUSION: The application of a motion correction algorithm was feasible for all data sets and led to an increase in both objective and subjective IQ parameters. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7987696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79876962021-04-12 Evaluation of a Motion Correction Algorithm for C-Arm Computed Tomography Acquired During Transarterial Chemoembolization Becker, Lena S. Gutberlet, Marcel Maschke, Sabine K. Werncke, Thomas Dewald, Cornelia L. A. von Falck, Christian Vogel, Arndt Kloeckner, Roman Meyer, Bernhard C. Wacker, Frank Hinrichs, Jan B. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility of a motion correction 3D reconstruction prototype technique for C-arm computed tomography (CACT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 65 consecutive CACTs acquired during transarterial chemoembolization of 54 patients (47 m,7f; 67 ± 11.3 years). All original raw datasets (CACT(Org)) underwent reconstruction with and without volume punching of high-contrast objects using a 3D image reconstruction software to compensate for motion (CACT(MC_bone);CACT(MC_no bone)). Subsequently, the effect on image quality (IQ) was evaluated using objective (image sharpness metric) and subjective criteria. Subjective criteria were defined by vessel geometry, overall IQ, delineation of tumor feeders, the presence of foreign material-induced artifacts and need for additional imaging, assessed by two independent readers on a 3-(vessel geometry and overall IQ) or 2-point scale, respectively. Friedman rank-sum test and post hoc analysis in form of pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test were computed and inter-observer agreement analyzed using kappa test. RESULTS: Objective IQ as defined by an image sharpness metric, increased from 273.5 ± 28 (CACT(Org)) to 328.5 ± 55.1 (CACT(MC_bone)) and 331 ± 57.8 (CACT(MC_no bone); all p < 0.0001). These results could largely be confirmed by the subjective analysis, which demonstrated predominantly good and moderate inter-observer agreement, with best agreement for CACT(MC_no bone) in all categories (e.g., vessel geometry: CACT(Org): κ = 0.51, CACT(MC_bone): κ = 0.42, CACT(MC_no bone): κ = 0.69). CONCLUSION: The application of a motion correction algorithm was feasible for all data sets and led to an increase in both objective and subjective IQ parameters. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Springer US 2020-12-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7987696/ /pubmed/33280058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02729-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Becker, Lena S.
Gutberlet, Marcel
Maschke, Sabine K.
Werncke, Thomas
Dewald, Cornelia L. A.
von Falck, Christian
Vogel, Arndt
Kloeckner, Roman
Meyer, Bernhard C.
Wacker, Frank
Hinrichs, Jan B.
Evaluation of a Motion Correction Algorithm for C-Arm Computed Tomography Acquired During Transarterial Chemoembolization
title Evaluation of a Motion Correction Algorithm for C-Arm Computed Tomography Acquired During Transarterial Chemoembolization
title_full Evaluation of a Motion Correction Algorithm for C-Arm Computed Tomography Acquired During Transarterial Chemoembolization
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Motion Correction Algorithm for C-Arm Computed Tomography Acquired During Transarterial Chemoembolization
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Motion Correction Algorithm for C-Arm Computed Tomography Acquired During Transarterial Chemoembolization
title_short Evaluation of a Motion Correction Algorithm for C-Arm Computed Tomography Acquired During Transarterial Chemoembolization
title_sort evaluation of a motion correction algorithm for c-arm computed tomography acquired during transarterial chemoembolization
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33280058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02729-6
work_keys_str_mv AT beckerlenas evaluationofamotioncorrectionalgorithmforcarmcomputedtomographyacquiredduringtransarterialchemoembolization
AT gutberletmarcel evaluationofamotioncorrectionalgorithmforcarmcomputedtomographyacquiredduringtransarterialchemoembolization
AT maschkesabinek evaluationofamotioncorrectionalgorithmforcarmcomputedtomographyacquiredduringtransarterialchemoembolization
AT wernckethomas evaluationofamotioncorrectionalgorithmforcarmcomputedtomographyacquiredduringtransarterialchemoembolization
AT dewaldcorneliala evaluationofamotioncorrectionalgorithmforcarmcomputedtomographyacquiredduringtransarterialchemoembolization
AT vonfalckchristian evaluationofamotioncorrectionalgorithmforcarmcomputedtomographyacquiredduringtransarterialchemoembolization
AT vogelarndt evaluationofamotioncorrectionalgorithmforcarmcomputedtomographyacquiredduringtransarterialchemoembolization
AT kloecknerroman evaluationofamotioncorrectionalgorithmforcarmcomputedtomographyacquiredduringtransarterialchemoembolization
AT meyerbernhardc evaluationofamotioncorrectionalgorithmforcarmcomputedtomographyacquiredduringtransarterialchemoembolization
AT wackerfrank evaluationofamotioncorrectionalgorithmforcarmcomputedtomographyacquiredduringtransarterialchemoembolization
AT hinrichsjanb evaluationofamotioncorrectionalgorithmforcarmcomputedtomographyacquiredduringtransarterialchemoembolization