Cargando…
Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of Ablation Completeness in Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors
BACKGROUND: In thermal ablation of liver tumors, complete coverage of the tumor volume by the ablation volume with a sufficient ablation margin is the most important factor for treatment success. Evaluation of ablation completeness is commonly performed by visual inspection in 2D and is prone to int...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777768 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.623098 |
_version_ | 1783668721725734912 |
---|---|
author | Sandu, Raluca-Maria Paolucci, Iwan Ruiter, Simeon J. S. Sznitman, Raphael de Jong, Koert P. Freedman, Jacob Weber, Stefan Tinguely, Pascale |
author_facet | Sandu, Raluca-Maria Paolucci, Iwan Ruiter, Simeon J. S. Sznitman, Raphael de Jong, Koert P. Freedman, Jacob Weber, Stefan Tinguely, Pascale |
author_sort | Sandu, Raluca-Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In thermal ablation of liver tumors, complete coverage of the tumor volume by the ablation volume with a sufficient ablation margin is the most important factor for treatment success. Evaluation of ablation completeness is commonly performed by visual inspection in 2D and is prone to inter-reader variability. This work aimed to introduce a standardized approach for evaluation of ablation completeness after CT-guided thermal ablation of liver tumors, using volumetric quantitative ablation margins (QAM). METHODS: A QAM computation metric based on volumetric segmentations of tumor and ablation areas and signed Euclidean surface distance maps was developed, including a novel algorithm to address QAM computation in subcapsular tumors. The code for QAM computation was verified in artificial examples of tumor and ablation spheres simulating varying scenarios of ablation margins. The applicability of the QAM metric was investigated in representative cases extracted from a prospective database of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) treated with stereotactic microwave ablation (SMWA). RESULTS: Applicability of the proposed QAM metric was confirmed in artificial and clinical example cases. Numerical and visual options of data presentation displaying substrata of QAM distributions were proposed. For subcapsular tumors, the underestimation of tumor coverage by the ablation volume when applying an unadjusted QAM method was confirmed, supporting the benefits of using the proposed algorithm for QAM computation in these cases. The computational code for developed QAM was made publicly available, encouraging the use of a standard and objective metric in reporting ablation completeness and margins. CONCLUSION: The proposed volumetric approach for QAM computation including a novel algorithm to address subcapsular liver tumors enables precision and reproducibility in the assessment of ablation margins. The quantitative feedback on ablation completeness opens possibilities for intra-operative decision making and for refined analyses on predictability and consistency of local tumor control after thermal ablation of liver tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7988092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79880922021-03-25 Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of Ablation Completeness in Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors Sandu, Raluca-Maria Paolucci, Iwan Ruiter, Simeon J. S. Sznitman, Raphael de Jong, Koert P. Freedman, Jacob Weber, Stefan Tinguely, Pascale Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: In thermal ablation of liver tumors, complete coverage of the tumor volume by the ablation volume with a sufficient ablation margin is the most important factor for treatment success. Evaluation of ablation completeness is commonly performed by visual inspection in 2D and is prone to inter-reader variability. This work aimed to introduce a standardized approach for evaluation of ablation completeness after CT-guided thermal ablation of liver tumors, using volumetric quantitative ablation margins (QAM). METHODS: A QAM computation metric based on volumetric segmentations of tumor and ablation areas and signed Euclidean surface distance maps was developed, including a novel algorithm to address QAM computation in subcapsular tumors. The code for QAM computation was verified in artificial examples of tumor and ablation spheres simulating varying scenarios of ablation margins. The applicability of the QAM metric was investigated in representative cases extracted from a prospective database of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) treated with stereotactic microwave ablation (SMWA). RESULTS: Applicability of the proposed QAM metric was confirmed in artificial and clinical example cases. Numerical and visual options of data presentation displaying substrata of QAM distributions were proposed. For subcapsular tumors, the underestimation of tumor coverage by the ablation volume when applying an unadjusted QAM method was confirmed, supporting the benefits of using the proposed algorithm for QAM computation in these cases. The computational code for developed QAM was made publicly available, encouraging the use of a standard and objective metric in reporting ablation completeness and margins. CONCLUSION: The proposed volumetric approach for QAM computation including a novel algorithm to address subcapsular liver tumors enables precision and reproducibility in the assessment of ablation margins. The quantitative feedback on ablation completeness opens possibilities for intra-operative decision making and for refined analyses on predictability and consistency of local tumor control after thermal ablation of liver tumors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7988092/ /pubmed/33777768 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.623098 Text en Copyright © 2021 Sandu, Paolucci, Ruiter, Sznitman, de Jong, Freedman, Weber and Tinguely http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Sandu, Raluca-Maria Paolucci, Iwan Ruiter, Simeon J. S. Sznitman, Raphael de Jong, Koert P. Freedman, Jacob Weber, Stefan Tinguely, Pascale Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of Ablation Completeness in Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors |
title | Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of Ablation Completeness in Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors |
title_full | Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of Ablation Completeness in Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors |
title_fullStr | Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of Ablation Completeness in Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of Ablation Completeness in Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors |
title_short | Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of Ablation Completeness in Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors |
title_sort | volumetric quantitative ablation margins for assessment of ablation completeness in thermal ablation of liver tumors |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777768 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.623098 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanduralucamaria volumetricquantitativeablationmarginsforassessmentofablationcompletenessinthermalablationoflivertumors AT paolucciiwan volumetricquantitativeablationmarginsforassessmentofablationcompletenessinthermalablationoflivertumors AT ruitersimeonjs volumetricquantitativeablationmarginsforassessmentofablationcompletenessinthermalablationoflivertumors AT sznitmanraphael volumetricquantitativeablationmarginsforassessmentofablationcompletenessinthermalablationoflivertumors AT dejongkoertp volumetricquantitativeablationmarginsforassessmentofablationcompletenessinthermalablationoflivertumors AT freedmanjacob volumetricquantitativeablationmarginsforassessmentofablationcompletenessinthermalablationoflivertumors AT weberstefan volumetricquantitativeablationmarginsforassessmentofablationcompletenessinthermalablationoflivertumors AT tinguelypascale volumetricquantitativeablationmarginsforassessmentofablationcompletenessinthermalablationoflivertumors |