Cargando…

Thigmotaxis in a virtual human open field test

Animal models are used to study neurobiological mechanisms in mental disorders. Although there has been significant progress in the understanding of neurobiological underpinnings of threat-related behaviors and anxiety, little progress was made with regard to new or improved treatments for mental di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gromer, Daniel, Kiser, Dominik P., Pauli, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33758204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85678-5
_version_ 1783668729020678144
author Gromer, Daniel
Kiser, Dominik P.
Pauli, Paul
author_facet Gromer, Daniel
Kiser, Dominik P.
Pauli, Paul
author_sort Gromer, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Animal models are used to study neurobiological mechanisms in mental disorders. Although there has been significant progress in the understanding of neurobiological underpinnings of threat-related behaviors and anxiety, little progress was made with regard to new or improved treatments for mental disorders. A possible reason for this lack of success is the unknown predictive and cross-species translational validity of animal models used in preclinical studies. Re-translational approaches, therefore, seek to establish cross-species translational validity by identifying behavioral operations shared across species. To this end, we implemented a human open field test in virtual reality and measured behavioral indices derived from animal studies in three experiments ([Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] ). In addition, we investigated the associations between anxious traits and such behaviors. Results indicated a strong similarity in behavior across species, i.e., participants in our study—like rodents in animal studies—preferred to stay in the outer region of the open field, as indexed by multiple behavioral parameters. However, correlational analyses did not clearly indicate that these behaviors were a function of anxious traits of participants. We conclude that the realized virtual open field test is able to elicit thigmotaxis and thus demonstrates cross-species validity of this aspect of the test. Modulatory effects of anxiety on human open field behavior should be examined further by incorporating possible threats in the virtual scenario and/or by examining participants with higher anxiety levels or anxiety disorder patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7988123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79881232021-03-25 Thigmotaxis in a virtual human open field test Gromer, Daniel Kiser, Dominik P. Pauli, Paul Sci Rep Article Animal models are used to study neurobiological mechanisms in mental disorders. Although there has been significant progress in the understanding of neurobiological underpinnings of threat-related behaviors and anxiety, little progress was made with regard to new or improved treatments for mental disorders. A possible reason for this lack of success is the unknown predictive and cross-species translational validity of animal models used in preclinical studies. Re-translational approaches, therefore, seek to establish cross-species translational validity by identifying behavioral operations shared across species. To this end, we implemented a human open field test in virtual reality and measured behavioral indices derived from animal studies in three experiments ([Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] ). In addition, we investigated the associations between anxious traits and such behaviors. Results indicated a strong similarity in behavior across species, i.e., participants in our study—like rodents in animal studies—preferred to stay in the outer region of the open field, as indexed by multiple behavioral parameters. However, correlational analyses did not clearly indicate that these behaviors were a function of anxious traits of participants. We conclude that the realized virtual open field test is able to elicit thigmotaxis and thus demonstrates cross-species validity of this aspect of the test. Modulatory effects of anxiety on human open field behavior should be examined further by incorporating possible threats in the virtual scenario and/or by examining participants with higher anxiety levels or anxiety disorder patients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7988123/ /pubmed/33758204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85678-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Gromer, Daniel
Kiser, Dominik P.
Pauli, Paul
Thigmotaxis in a virtual human open field test
title Thigmotaxis in a virtual human open field test
title_full Thigmotaxis in a virtual human open field test
title_fullStr Thigmotaxis in a virtual human open field test
title_full_unstemmed Thigmotaxis in a virtual human open field test
title_short Thigmotaxis in a virtual human open field test
title_sort thigmotaxis in a virtual human open field test
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33758204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85678-5
work_keys_str_mv AT gromerdaniel thigmotaxisinavirtualhumanopenfieldtest
AT kiserdominikp thigmotaxisinavirtualhumanopenfieldtest
AT paulipaul thigmotaxisinavirtualhumanopenfieldtest