Cargando…

Middle Frontal Gyrus and Area 55b: Perioperative Mapping and Language Outcomes

Background: The simplistic approaches to language circuits are continuously challenged by new findings in brain structure and connectivity. The posterior middle frontal gyrus and area 55b (pFMG/area55b), in particular, has gained a renewed interest in the overall language network. Methods: This is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hazem, Sally Rosario, Awan, Mariam, Lavrador, Jose Pedro, Patel, Sabina, Wren, Hilary Margaret, Lucena, Oeslle, Semedo, Carla, Irzan, Hassna, Melbourne, Andrew, Ourselin, Sebastien, Shapey, Jonathan, Kailaya-Vasan, Ahilan, Gullan, Richard, Ashkan, Keyoumars, Bhangoo, Ranjeev, Vergani, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.646075
_version_ 1783668743298088960
author Hazem, Sally Rosario
Awan, Mariam
Lavrador, Jose Pedro
Patel, Sabina
Wren, Hilary Margaret
Lucena, Oeslle
Semedo, Carla
Irzan, Hassna
Melbourne, Andrew
Ourselin, Sebastien
Shapey, Jonathan
Kailaya-Vasan, Ahilan
Gullan, Richard
Ashkan, Keyoumars
Bhangoo, Ranjeev
Vergani, Francesco
author_facet Hazem, Sally Rosario
Awan, Mariam
Lavrador, Jose Pedro
Patel, Sabina
Wren, Hilary Margaret
Lucena, Oeslle
Semedo, Carla
Irzan, Hassna
Melbourne, Andrew
Ourselin, Sebastien
Shapey, Jonathan
Kailaya-Vasan, Ahilan
Gullan, Richard
Ashkan, Keyoumars
Bhangoo, Ranjeev
Vergani, Francesco
author_sort Hazem, Sally Rosario
collection PubMed
description Background: The simplistic approaches to language circuits are continuously challenged by new findings in brain structure and connectivity. The posterior middle frontal gyrus and area 55b (pFMG/area55b), in particular, has gained a renewed interest in the overall language network. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients who have undergone awake craniotomy for tumor resection. Navigated transcranial magnetic simulation (nTMS), tractography, and intraoperative findings were correlated with language outcomes. Results: Sixty-five awake craniotomies were performed between 2012 and 2020, and 24 patients were included. nTMS elicited 42 positive responses, 76.2% in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and hesitation was the most common error (71.4%). In the pMFG/area55b, there were seven positive errors (five hesitations and two phonemic errors). This area had the highest positive predictive value (43.0%), negative predictive value (98.3%), sensitivity (50.0%), and specificity (99.0%) among all the frontal gyri. Intraoperatively, there were 33 cortical positive responses—two (6.0%) in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG), 15 (45.5%) in the MFG, and 16 (48.5%) in the IFG. A total of 29 subcortical positive responses were elicited−21 in the deep IFG–MFG gyri and eight in the deep SFG–MFG gyri. The most common errors identified were speech arrest at the cortical level (20 responses−13 in the IFG and seven in the MFG) and anomia at the subcortical level (nine patients—eight in the deep IFG–MFG and one in the deep MFG–SFG). Moreover, 83.3% of patients had a transitory deterioration of language after surgery, mainly in the expressive component (p = 0.03). An increased number of gyri with intraoperative positive responses were related with better preoperative (p = 0.037) and worse postoperative (p = 0.029) outcomes. The involvement of the SFG–MFG subcortical area was related with worse language outcomes (p = 0.037). Positive nTMS mapping in the IFG was associated with a better preoperative language outcome (p = 0.017), relating to a better performance in the expressive component, while positive mapping in the MFG was related to a worse preoperative receptive component of language (p = 0.031). Conclusion: This case series suggests that the posterior middle frontal gyrus, including area 55b, is an important integration cortical hub for both dorsal and ventral streams of language.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7988187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79881872021-03-25 Middle Frontal Gyrus and Area 55b: Perioperative Mapping and Language Outcomes Hazem, Sally Rosario Awan, Mariam Lavrador, Jose Pedro Patel, Sabina Wren, Hilary Margaret Lucena, Oeslle Semedo, Carla Irzan, Hassna Melbourne, Andrew Ourselin, Sebastien Shapey, Jonathan Kailaya-Vasan, Ahilan Gullan, Richard Ashkan, Keyoumars Bhangoo, Ranjeev Vergani, Francesco Front Neurol Neurology Background: The simplistic approaches to language circuits are continuously challenged by new findings in brain structure and connectivity. The posterior middle frontal gyrus and area 55b (pFMG/area55b), in particular, has gained a renewed interest in the overall language network. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients who have undergone awake craniotomy for tumor resection. Navigated transcranial magnetic simulation (nTMS), tractography, and intraoperative findings were correlated with language outcomes. Results: Sixty-five awake craniotomies were performed between 2012 and 2020, and 24 patients were included. nTMS elicited 42 positive responses, 76.2% in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and hesitation was the most common error (71.4%). In the pMFG/area55b, there were seven positive errors (five hesitations and two phonemic errors). This area had the highest positive predictive value (43.0%), negative predictive value (98.3%), sensitivity (50.0%), and specificity (99.0%) among all the frontal gyri. Intraoperatively, there were 33 cortical positive responses—two (6.0%) in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG), 15 (45.5%) in the MFG, and 16 (48.5%) in the IFG. A total of 29 subcortical positive responses were elicited−21 in the deep IFG–MFG gyri and eight in the deep SFG–MFG gyri. The most common errors identified were speech arrest at the cortical level (20 responses−13 in the IFG and seven in the MFG) and anomia at the subcortical level (nine patients—eight in the deep IFG–MFG and one in the deep MFG–SFG). Moreover, 83.3% of patients had a transitory deterioration of language after surgery, mainly in the expressive component (p = 0.03). An increased number of gyri with intraoperative positive responses were related with better preoperative (p = 0.037) and worse postoperative (p = 0.029) outcomes. The involvement of the SFG–MFG subcortical area was related with worse language outcomes (p = 0.037). Positive nTMS mapping in the IFG was associated with a better preoperative language outcome (p = 0.017), relating to a better performance in the expressive component, while positive mapping in the MFG was related to a worse preoperative receptive component of language (p = 0.031). Conclusion: This case series suggests that the posterior middle frontal gyrus, including area 55b, is an important integration cortical hub for both dorsal and ventral streams of language. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7988187/ /pubmed/33776898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.646075 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hazem, Awan, Lavrador, Patel, Wren, Lucena, Semedo, Irzan, Melbourne, Ourselin, Shapey, Kailaya-Vasan, Gullan, Ashkan, Bhangoo and Vergani. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Hazem, Sally Rosario
Awan, Mariam
Lavrador, Jose Pedro
Patel, Sabina
Wren, Hilary Margaret
Lucena, Oeslle
Semedo, Carla
Irzan, Hassna
Melbourne, Andrew
Ourselin, Sebastien
Shapey, Jonathan
Kailaya-Vasan, Ahilan
Gullan, Richard
Ashkan, Keyoumars
Bhangoo, Ranjeev
Vergani, Francesco
Middle Frontal Gyrus and Area 55b: Perioperative Mapping and Language Outcomes
title Middle Frontal Gyrus and Area 55b: Perioperative Mapping and Language Outcomes
title_full Middle Frontal Gyrus and Area 55b: Perioperative Mapping and Language Outcomes
title_fullStr Middle Frontal Gyrus and Area 55b: Perioperative Mapping and Language Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Middle Frontal Gyrus and Area 55b: Perioperative Mapping and Language Outcomes
title_short Middle Frontal Gyrus and Area 55b: Perioperative Mapping and Language Outcomes
title_sort middle frontal gyrus and area 55b: perioperative mapping and language outcomes
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.646075
work_keys_str_mv AT hazemsallyrosario middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT awanmariam middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT lavradorjosepedro middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT patelsabina middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT wrenhilarymargaret middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT lucenaoeslle middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT semedocarla middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT irzanhassna middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT melbourneandrew middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT ourselinsebastien middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT shapeyjonathan middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT kailayavasanahilan middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT gullanrichard middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT ashkankeyoumars middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT bhangooranjeev middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes
AT verganifrancesco middlefrontalgyrusandarea55bperioperativemappingandlanguageoutcomes