Cargando…
Comparative efficacy of interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia: systematic review and network meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To describe the comparative efficacy of drug and non-drug interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia who experience depression as a neuropsychiatric symptom of dementia or have a diagnosis of a major depressive disorder. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33762262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n532 |
_version_ | 1783668789009711104 |
---|---|
author | Watt, Jennifer A Goodarzi, Zahra Veroniki, Areti Angeliki Nincic, Vera Khan, Paul A Ghassemi, Marco Lai, Yonda Treister, Victoria Thompson, Yuan Schneider, Raphael Tricco, Andrea C Straus, Sharon E |
author_facet | Watt, Jennifer A Goodarzi, Zahra Veroniki, Areti Angeliki Nincic, Vera Khan, Paul A Ghassemi, Marco Lai, Yonda Treister, Victoria Thompson, Yuan Schneider, Raphael Tricco, Andrea C Straus, Sharon E |
author_sort | Watt, Jennifer A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To describe the comparative efficacy of drug and non-drug interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia who experience depression as a neuropsychiatric symptom of dementia or have a diagnosis of a major depressive disorder. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and grey literature between inception and 15 October 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised trials comparing drug or non-drug interventions with usual care or any other intervention targeting symptoms of depression in people with dementia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pairs of reviewers screened studies, abstracted aggregate level data, and appraised risk of bias with the Cochrane risk of bias tool, which facilitated the derivation of standardised mean differences and back transformed mean differences (on the Cornell scale for depression in dementia) from bayesian random effects network meta-analyses and pairwise meta-analyses. RESULTS: Of 22 138 citations screened, 256 studies (28 483 people with dementia) were included. Missing data posed the greatest risk to review findings. In the network meta-analysis of studies including people with dementia without a diagnosis of a major depressive disorder who were experiencing symptoms of depression (213 studies; 25 177 people with dementia; between study variance 0.23), seven interventions were associated with a greater reduction in symptoms of depression compared with usual care: cognitive stimulation (mean difference −2.93, 95% credible interval −4.35 to −1.52), cognitive stimulation combined with a cholinesterase inhibitor (−11.39, −18.38 to −3.93), massage and touch therapy (−9.03, −12.28 to −5.88), multidisciplinary care (−1.98, −3.80 to −0.16), occupational therapy (−2.59, −4.70 to −0.40), exercise combined with social interaction and cognitive stimulation (−12.37, −19.01 to −5.36), and reminiscence therapy (−2.30, −3.68 to −0.93). Except for massage and touch therapy, cognitive stimulation combined with a cholinesterase inhibitor, and cognitive stimulation combined with exercise and social interaction, which were more efficacious than some drug interventions, no statistically significant difference was found in the comparative efficacy of drug and non-drug interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia without a diagnosis of a major depressive disorder. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded network meta-analysis of studies comparing the efficacy of interventions specifically for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia and a major depressive disorder (22 studies; 1829 patients). CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, non-drug interventions were found to be more efficacious than drug interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia without a major depressive disorder. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017050130. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7988455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79884552021-03-29 Comparative efficacy of interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia: systematic review and network meta-analysis Watt, Jennifer A Goodarzi, Zahra Veroniki, Areti Angeliki Nincic, Vera Khan, Paul A Ghassemi, Marco Lai, Yonda Treister, Victoria Thompson, Yuan Schneider, Raphael Tricco, Andrea C Straus, Sharon E BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To describe the comparative efficacy of drug and non-drug interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia who experience depression as a neuropsychiatric symptom of dementia or have a diagnosis of a major depressive disorder. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and grey literature between inception and 15 October 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised trials comparing drug or non-drug interventions with usual care or any other intervention targeting symptoms of depression in people with dementia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pairs of reviewers screened studies, abstracted aggregate level data, and appraised risk of bias with the Cochrane risk of bias tool, which facilitated the derivation of standardised mean differences and back transformed mean differences (on the Cornell scale for depression in dementia) from bayesian random effects network meta-analyses and pairwise meta-analyses. RESULTS: Of 22 138 citations screened, 256 studies (28 483 people with dementia) were included. Missing data posed the greatest risk to review findings. In the network meta-analysis of studies including people with dementia without a diagnosis of a major depressive disorder who were experiencing symptoms of depression (213 studies; 25 177 people with dementia; between study variance 0.23), seven interventions were associated with a greater reduction in symptoms of depression compared with usual care: cognitive stimulation (mean difference −2.93, 95% credible interval −4.35 to −1.52), cognitive stimulation combined with a cholinesterase inhibitor (−11.39, −18.38 to −3.93), massage and touch therapy (−9.03, −12.28 to −5.88), multidisciplinary care (−1.98, −3.80 to −0.16), occupational therapy (−2.59, −4.70 to −0.40), exercise combined with social interaction and cognitive stimulation (−12.37, −19.01 to −5.36), and reminiscence therapy (−2.30, −3.68 to −0.93). Except for massage and touch therapy, cognitive stimulation combined with a cholinesterase inhibitor, and cognitive stimulation combined with exercise and social interaction, which were more efficacious than some drug interventions, no statistically significant difference was found in the comparative efficacy of drug and non-drug interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia without a diagnosis of a major depressive disorder. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded network meta-analysis of studies comparing the efficacy of interventions specifically for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia and a major depressive disorder (22 studies; 1829 patients). CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, non-drug interventions were found to be more efficacious than drug interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia without a major depressive disorder. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017050130. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7988455/ /pubmed/33762262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n532 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Watt, Jennifer A Goodarzi, Zahra Veroniki, Areti Angeliki Nincic, Vera Khan, Paul A Ghassemi, Marco Lai, Yonda Treister, Victoria Thompson, Yuan Schneider, Raphael Tricco, Andrea C Straus, Sharon E Comparative efficacy of interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy of interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy of interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy of interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy of interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy of interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy of interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33762262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n532 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wattjennifera comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforreducingsymptomsofdepressioninpeoplewithdementiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT goodarzizahra comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforreducingsymptomsofdepressioninpeoplewithdementiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT veronikiaretiangeliki comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforreducingsymptomsofdepressioninpeoplewithdementiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT nincicvera comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforreducingsymptomsofdepressioninpeoplewithdementiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT khanpaula comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforreducingsymptomsofdepressioninpeoplewithdementiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT ghassemimarco comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforreducingsymptomsofdepressioninpeoplewithdementiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT laiyonda comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforreducingsymptomsofdepressioninpeoplewithdementiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT treistervictoria comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforreducingsymptomsofdepressioninpeoplewithdementiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT thompsonyuan comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforreducingsymptomsofdepressioninpeoplewithdementiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT schneiderraphael comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforreducingsymptomsofdepressioninpeoplewithdementiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT triccoandreac comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforreducingsymptomsofdepressioninpeoplewithdementiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT straussharone comparativeefficacyofinterventionsforreducingsymptomsofdepressioninpeoplewithdementiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |