Cargando…
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population about Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis with policy recommendations
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate and synthesize the current evidence on knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) of the general population regarding COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search on PubMed/LitCovid, Scopu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33962095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.03.005 |
_version_ | 1783668793006882816 |
---|---|
author | Saadatjoo, S. Miri, M. Hassanipour, S. Ameri, H. Arab-Zozani, M. |
author_facet | Saadatjoo, S. Miri, M. Hassanipour, S. Ameri, H. Arab-Zozani, M. |
author_sort | Saadatjoo, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate and synthesize the current evidence on knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) of the general population regarding COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search on PubMed/LitCovid, Scopus, and Web of Sciences databases for papers in the English language only, up to 1 January 2021. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist developed for cross-sectional studies to appraise the quality of the included studies. All stages of the review conducted by two independent reviewers and potential discrepancies were solved with a consultation with a third reviewer. We reported the result as number and percentage. A meta-analysis conducted using a random effect model with a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies encompassing 76,848 participants were included in this review. 56.53% of the participants were female. The mean age of the participants was 33.7 years. 85.42% of the included studies were scored as good quality, 12.50% as fair quality, and the remaining (2.08%) as low quality. About 87.5% examined all three components of the KAPs model. The knowledge component was reported as good and poor in 89.5% and 10.5% of the included studies, respectively. Of the studies that examined the attitude component, 100% reported a positive attitude. For the practice component, 93.2% reported satisfactory practice, and 6.8% poor practice. The result of the meta-analysis showed that the overall score of KAPs components about COVID-19 were 78.9, 79.8, and 74.1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the overall KAP components in the included studies were at an acceptable level. In general, knowledge was at a good level, the attitude was positive and practice was at a satisfactory level. Using an integrated international system can help better evaluate these components and compare them between countries. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CODE: (CRD42020186755). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7988473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79884732021-03-24 Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population about Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis with policy recommendations Saadatjoo, S. Miri, M. Hassanipour, S. Ameri, H. Arab-Zozani, M. Public Health Review Paper OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate and synthesize the current evidence on knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) of the general population regarding COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search on PubMed/LitCovid, Scopus, and Web of Sciences databases for papers in the English language only, up to 1 January 2021. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist developed for cross-sectional studies to appraise the quality of the included studies. All stages of the review conducted by two independent reviewers and potential discrepancies were solved with a consultation with a third reviewer. We reported the result as number and percentage. A meta-analysis conducted using a random effect model with a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies encompassing 76,848 participants were included in this review. 56.53% of the participants were female. The mean age of the participants was 33.7 years. 85.42% of the included studies were scored as good quality, 12.50% as fair quality, and the remaining (2.08%) as low quality. About 87.5% examined all three components of the KAPs model. The knowledge component was reported as good and poor in 89.5% and 10.5% of the included studies, respectively. Of the studies that examined the attitude component, 100% reported a positive attitude. For the practice component, 93.2% reported satisfactory practice, and 6.8% poor practice. The result of the meta-analysis showed that the overall score of KAPs components about COVID-19 were 78.9, 79.8, and 74.1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the overall KAP components in the included studies were at an acceptable level. In general, knowledge was at a good level, the attitude was positive and practice was at a satisfactory level. Using an integrated international system can help better evaluate these components and compare them between countries. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CODE: (CRD42020186755). The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-05 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7988473/ /pubmed/33962095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.03.005 Text en © 2021 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Saadatjoo, S. Miri, M. Hassanipour, S. Ameri, H. Arab-Zozani, M. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population about Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis with policy recommendations |
title | Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population about Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis with policy recommendations |
title_full | Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population about Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis with policy recommendations |
title_fullStr | Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population about Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis with policy recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population about Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis with policy recommendations |
title_short | Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population about Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis with policy recommendations |
title_sort | knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population about coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis with policy recommendations |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33962095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.03.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saadatjoos knowledgeattitudesandpracticesofthegeneralpopulationaboutcoronavirusdisease2019covid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithpolicyrecommendations AT mirim knowledgeattitudesandpracticesofthegeneralpopulationaboutcoronavirusdisease2019covid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithpolicyrecommendations AT hassanipours knowledgeattitudesandpracticesofthegeneralpopulationaboutcoronavirusdisease2019covid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithpolicyrecommendations AT amerih knowledgeattitudesandpracticesofthegeneralpopulationaboutcoronavirusdisease2019covid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithpolicyrecommendations AT arabzozanim knowledgeattitudesandpracticesofthegeneralpopulationaboutcoronavirusdisease2019covid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithpolicyrecommendations |