Cargando…
Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations
We herein summarise the evidence concerning the impact of sperm DNA fragmentation in various clinical infertility scenarios and the advances on sperm DNA fragmentation tests. The collected evidence was used to formulate 41 recommendations. Of these, 13 recommendations concern technical aspects of sp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/and.13874 |
_version_ | 1783668805675778048 |
---|---|
author | Esteves, Sandro C. Zini, Armand Coward, Robert Matthew Evenson, Donald P. Gosálvez, Jaime Lewis, Sheena E. M. Sharma, Rakesh Humaidan, Peter |
author_facet | Esteves, Sandro C. Zini, Armand Coward, Robert Matthew Evenson, Donald P. Gosálvez, Jaime Lewis, Sheena E. M. Sharma, Rakesh Humaidan, Peter |
author_sort | Esteves, Sandro C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We herein summarise the evidence concerning the impact of sperm DNA fragmentation in various clinical infertility scenarios and the advances on sperm DNA fragmentation tests. The collected evidence was used to formulate 41 recommendations. Of these, 13 recommendations concern technical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation testing, including pre‐analytical information, clinical thresholds and interpretation of results. The remaining 28 recommendations relate to indications for sperm DNA fragmentation testing and clinical management. Clinical scenarios like varicocele, unexplained infertility, idiopathic infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, fertility counselling for men with infertility risk factors and sperm cryopreservation have been contemplated. The bulk evidence supporting the recommendations has increased in recent years, but it is still of moderate to low quality. This guideline provides clinicians with advice on best practices in sperm DNA fragmentation testing. Also, recommendations are provided on possible management strategies to overcome infertility related to sperm DNA fragmentation, based on the best available evidence. Lastly, we identified gaps in knowledge and opportunities for research and elaborated a list of recommendations to stimulate further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7988559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79885592021-03-25 Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations Esteves, Sandro C. Zini, Armand Coward, Robert Matthew Evenson, Donald P. Gosálvez, Jaime Lewis, Sheena E. M. Sharma, Rakesh Humaidan, Peter Andrologia Invited Reviews We herein summarise the evidence concerning the impact of sperm DNA fragmentation in various clinical infertility scenarios and the advances on sperm DNA fragmentation tests. The collected evidence was used to formulate 41 recommendations. Of these, 13 recommendations concern technical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation testing, including pre‐analytical information, clinical thresholds and interpretation of results. The remaining 28 recommendations relate to indications for sperm DNA fragmentation testing and clinical management. Clinical scenarios like varicocele, unexplained infertility, idiopathic infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, fertility counselling for men with infertility risk factors and sperm cryopreservation have been contemplated. The bulk evidence supporting the recommendations has increased in recent years, but it is still of moderate to low quality. This guideline provides clinicians with advice on best practices in sperm DNA fragmentation testing. Also, recommendations are provided on possible management strategies to overcome infertility related to sperm DNA fragmentation, based on the best available evidence. Lastly, we identified gaps in knowledge and opportunities for research and elaborated a list of recommendations to stimulate further investigation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-27 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7988559/ /pubmed/33108829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/and.13874 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Andrologia published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Invited Reviews Esteves, Sandro C. Zini, Armand Coward, Robert Matthew Evenson, Donald P. Gosálvez, Jaime Lewis, Sheena E. M. Sharma, Rakesh Humaidan, Peter Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations |
title | Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations |
title_full | Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations |
title_fullStr | Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations |
title_short | Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations |
title_sort | sperm dna fragmentation testing: summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations |
topic | Invited Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/and.13874 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT estevessandroc spermdnafragmentationtestingsummaryevidenceandclinicalpracticerecommendations AT ziniarmand spermdnafragmentationtestingsummaryevidenceandclinicalpracticerecommendations AT cowardrobertmatthew spermdnafragmentationtestingsummaryevidenceandclinicalpracticerecommendations AT evensondonaldp spermdnafragmentationtestingsummaryevidenceandclinicalpracticerecommendations AT gosalvezjaime spermdnafragmentationtestingsummaryevidenceandclinicalpracticerecommendations AT lewissheenaem spermdnafragmentationtestingsummaryevidenceandclinicalpracticerecommendations AT sharmarakesh spermdnafragmentationtestingsummaryevidenceandclinicalpracticerecommendations AT humaidanpeter spermdnafragmentationtestingsummaryevidenceandclinicalpracticerecommendations |