Cargando…
SARS‐CoV‐2 re‐infection risk in Austria
BACKGROUND: A key question concerning coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is how effective and long lasting immunity against this disease is in individuals who were previously infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). We aimed to evaluate the risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 re‐i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33583018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eci.13520 |
_version_ | 1783668811068604416 |
---|---|
author | Pilz, Stefan Chakeri, Ali Ioannidis, John PA Richter, Lukas Theiler‐Schwetz, Verena Trummer, Christian Krause, Robert Allerberger, Franz |
author_facet | Pilz, Stefan Chakeri, Ali Ioannidis, John PA Richter, Lukas Theiler‐Schwetz, Verena Trummer, Christian Krause, Robert Allerberger, Franz |
author_sort | Pilz, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A key question concerning coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is how effective and long lasting immunity against this disease is in individuals who were previously infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). We aimed to evaluate the risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 re‐infections in the general population in Austria. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study using national SARS‐CoV‐2 infection data from the Austrian epidemiological reporting system. As the primary outcome, we aim to compare the odds of SARS‐CoV‐2 re‐infections of COVID‐19 survivors of the first wave (February to April 30, 2020) versus the odds of first infections in the remainder general population by tracking polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐confirmed infections of both groups during the second wave from September 1 to November 30, 2020. Re‐infection counts are tentative, since it cannot be excluded that the positive PCR in the first and/or second wave might have been a false positive. RESULTS: We recorded 40 tentative re‐infections in 14 840 COVID‐19 survivors of the first wave (0.27%) and 253 581 infections in 8 885 640 individuals of the remaining general population (2.85%) translating into an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.09 (0.07 to 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a relatively low re‐infection rate of SARS‐CoV‐2 in Austria. Protection against SARS‐CoV‐2 after natural infection is comparable with the highest available estimates on vaccine efficacies. Further well‐designed research on this issue is urgently needed for improving evidence‐based decisions on public health measures and vaccination strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7988582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79885822021-03-25 SARS‐CoV‐2 re‐infection risk in Austria Pilz, Stefan Chakeri, Ali Ioannidis, John PA Richter, Lukas Theiler‐Schwetz, Verena Trummer, Christian Krause, Robert Allerberger, Franz Eur J Clin Invest Original Articles BACKGROUND: A key question concerning coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is how effective and long lasting immunity against this disease is in individuals who were previously infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). We aimed to evaluate the risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 re‐infections in the general population in Austria. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study using national SARS‐CoV‐2 infection data from the Austrian epidemiological reporting system. As the primary outcome, we aim to compare the odds of SARS‐CoV‐2 re‐infections of COVID‐19 survivors of the first wave (February to April 30, 2020) versus the odds of first infections in the remainder general population by tracking polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐confirmed infections of both groups during the second wave from September 1 to November 30, 2020. Re‐infection counts are tentative, since it cannot be excluded that the positive PCR in the first and/or second wave might have been a false positive. RESULTS: We recorded 40 tentative re‐infections in 14 840 COVID‐19 survivors of the first wave (0.27%) and 253 581 infections in 8 885 640 individuals of the remaining general population (2.85%) translating into an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.09 (0.07 to 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a relatively low re‐infection rate of SARS‐CoV‐2 in Austria. Protection against SARS‐CoV‐2 after natural infection is comparable with the highest available estimates on vaccine efficacies. Further well‐designed research on this issue is urgently needed for improving evidence‐based decisions on public health measures and vaccination strategies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-21 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7988582/ /pubmed/33583018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eci.13520 Text en © 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Clinical Investigation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Pilz, Stefan Chakeri, Ali Ioannidis, John PA Richter, Lukas Theiler‐Schwetz, Verena Trummer, Christian Krause, Robert Allerberger, Franz SARS‐CoV‐2 re‐infection risk in Austria |
title | SARS‐CoV‐2 re‐infection risk in Austria |
title_full | SARS‐CoV‐2 re‐infection risk in Austria |
title_fullStr | SARS‐CoV‐2 re‐infection risk in Austria |
title_full_unstemmed | SARS‐CoV‐2 re‐infection risk in Austria |
title_short | SARS‐CoV‐2 re‐infection risk in Austria |
title_sort | sars‐cov‐2 re‐infection risk in austria |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33583018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eci.13520 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pilzstefan sarscov2reinfectionriskinaustria AT chakeriali sarscov2reinfectionriskinaustria AT ioannidisjohnpa sarscov2reinfectionriskinaustria AT richterlukas sarscov2reinfectionriskinaustria AT theilerschwetzverena sarscov2reinfectionriskinaustria AT trummerchristian sarscov2reinfectionriskinaustria AT krauserobert sarscov2reinfectionriskinaustria AT allerbergerfranz sarscov2reinfectionriskinaustria |