Cargando…

Framing and self-responsibility modulate brain activities in decision escalation

BACKGROUND: Escalation of commitment is a common bias in human decision making. The present study examined (1) differences in neural recruitment for escalation and de-escalation decisions of prior investments, and (2) how the activations of these brain networks are affected by two factors that can a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Ting-Peng, Li, Yu-Wen, Yen, Nai-Shing, Turel, Ofir, Hsu, Sen-Mou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33757435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-021-00625-4
_version_ 1783668877889110016
author Liang, Ting-Peng
Li, Yu-Wen
Yen, Nai-Shing
Turel, Ofir
Hsu, Sen-Mou
author_facet Liang, Ting-Peng
Li, Yu-Wen
Yen, Nai-Shing
Turel, Ofir
Hsu, Sen-Mou
author_sort Liang, Ting-Peng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Escalation of commitment is a common bias in human decision making. The present study examined (1) differences in neural recruitment for escalation and de-escalation decisions of prior investments, and (2) how the activations of these brain networks are affected by two factors that can arguably modulate escalation decisions: (i) self-responsibility, and (ii) framing of the success probabilities. RESULTS: Imaging data were obtained from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) applied to 29 participants. A whole-brain analysis was conducted to compare brain activations between conditions. ROI analysis, then, was used to examine if these significant activations were modulated by two contextual factors. Finally, mediation analysis was applied to explore how the contextual factors affect escalation decisions through brain activations. The findings showed that (1) escalation decisions are faster than de-escalation decisions, (2) the corresponding network of brain regions recruited for escalation (anterior cingulate cortex, insula and precuneus) decisions differs from this recruited for de-escalation decisions (inferior and superior frontal gyri), (3) the switch from escalation to de-escalation is primarily frontal gyri dependent, and (4) activation in the anterior cingulate cortex, insula and precuneus were further increased in escalation decisions, when the outcome probabilities of the follow-up investment were positively framed; and activation in the inferior and superior frontal gyri in de-escalation decisions were increased when the outcome probabilities were negatively framed. CONCLUSIONS: Escalation and de-escalation decisions recruit different brain regions. Framing of possible outcomes as negative leads to escalation decisions through recruitment of the inferior frontal gyrus. Responsibility for decisions affects escalation decisions through recruitment of the superior (inferior) gyrus, when the decision is framed positively (negatively).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7989009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79890092021-03-25 Framing and self-responsibility modulate brain activities in decision escalation Liang, Ting-Peng Li, Yu-Wen Yen, Nai-Shing Turel, Ofir Hsu, Sen-Mou BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Escalation of commitment is a common bias in human decision making. The present study examined (1) differences in neural recruitment for escalation and de-escalation decisions of prior investments, and (2) how the activations of these brain networks are affected by two factors that can arguably modulate escalation decisions: (i) self-responsibility, and (ii) framing of the success probabilities. RESULTS: Imaging data were obtained from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) applied to 29 participants. A whole-brain analysis was conducted to compare brain activations between conditions. ROI analysis, then, was used to examine if these significant activations were modulated by two contextual factors. Finally, mediation analysis was applied to explore how the contextual factors affect escalation decisions through brain activations. The findings showed that (1) escalation decisions are faster than de-escalation decisions, (2) the corresponding network of brain regions recruited for escalation (anterior cingulate cortex, insula and precuneus) decisions differs from this recruited for de-escalation decisions (inferior and superior frontal gyri), (3) the switch from escalation to de-escalation is primarily frontal gyri dependent, and (4) activation in the anterior cingulate cortex, insula and precuneus were further increased in escalation decisions, when the outcome probabilities of the follow-up investment were positively framed; and activation in the inferior and superior frontal gyri in de-escalation decisions were increased when the outcome probabilities were negatively framed. CONCLUSIONS: Escalation and de-escalation decisions recruit different brain regions. Framing of possible outcomes as negative leads to escalation decisions through recruitment of the inferior frontal gyrus. Responsibility for decisions affects escalation decisions through recruitment of the superior (inferior) gyrus, when the decision is framed positively (negatively). BioMed Central 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7989009/ /pubmed/33757435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-021-00625-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liang, Ting-Peng
Li, Yu-Wen
Yen, Nai-Shing
Turel, Ofir
Hsu, Sen-Mou
Framing and self-responsibility modulate brain activities in decision escalation
title Framing and self-responsibility modulate brain activities in decision escalation
title_full Framing and self-responsibility modulate brain activities in decision escalation
title_fullStr Framing and self-responsibility modulate brain activities in decision escalation
title_full_unstemmed Framing and self-responsibility modulate brain activities in decision escalation
title_short Framing and self-responsibility modulate brain activities in decision escalation
title_sort framing and self-responsibility modulate brain activities in decision escalation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33757435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-021-00625-4
work_keys_str_mv AT liangtingpeng framingandselfresponsibilitymodulatebrainactivitiesindecisionescalation
AT liyuwen framingandselfresponsibilitymodulatebrainactivitiesindecisionescalation
AT yennaishing framingandselfresponsibilitymodulatebrainactivitiesindecisionescalation
AT turelofir framingandselfresponsibilitymodulatebrainactivitiesindecisionescalation
AT hsusenmou framingandselfresponsibilitymodulatebrainactivitiesindecisionescalation