Cargando…
Simultaneous or staged operation for tandem spinal stenosis: surgical strategy and efficacy comparison
BACKGROUND: Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) has a complex clinical presentation, and there is no consensus on the optimal surgical strategy. This study retrospectively compared the efficacy of different staged operations and simultaneous decompression for patients with TSS. METHODS: We reviewed data fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02357-x |
_version_ | 1783668895184322560 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Junming Gao, Xianda Yang, Yipeng Lei, Tao Shen, Yong Wang, Linfeng Tian, Zheng |
author_facet | Cao, Junming Gao, Xianda Yang, Yipeng Lei, Tao Shen, Yong Wang, Linfeng Tian, Zheng |
author_sort | Cao, Junming |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) has a complex clinical presentation, and there is no consensus on the optimal surgical strategy. This study retrospectively compared the efficacy of different staged operations and simultaneous decompression for patients with TSS. METHODS: We reviewed data from 132 patients with TSS who received surgical procedures from January 2011 to June 2018. Patients were classified into three groups according to the most symptomatic area of compression (group C: first-stage surgery for cervical compression; group L: first-stage surgery for lumbar compression; group CL: simultaneous surgery for both). Medical records were reviewed for age, gender, comorbidities, operation time, combined estimated blood loss, and time of hospitalization. The JOA-C, JOA-L, NDI, and ODI scores, and complications were also examined. RESULTS: Postoperative outcomes were followed for 32.1 ± 5.4 months. There were significant differences in the re-operation rate and the interval time between the two types of staged operations (p = 0.005 and p = 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in gender (p = 0.639), operation time (p = 0.138), combined estimated blood loss (p = 0.116), or complications (p = 0.652) among the three groups, while the simultaneous group was significantly younger (p = 0.027), with fewer comorbidities (p < 0.001) and a shorter hospitalization time (p < 0.001). At the final follow-up, the JOA-C and JOA-L scores were increased, while the NDI and ODI scores were decreased, compared with the preoperative scores. CONCLUSIONS: TSS can be effectively managed by either simultaneous or staged decompressions. First-stage surgery for cervical stenosis significantly lowers the requirement for second-stage lumbar surgery. One-stage simultaneous decompression is safe and effective with the advantage of reduce hospitalization time, without an increase in operative time or bleeding. However, the surgical indications should be strictly controlled and is recommended for younger patients with fewer comorbidities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7989104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79891042021-03-25 Simultaneous or staged operation for tandem spinal stenosis: surgical strategy and efficacy comparison Cao, Junming Gao, Xianda Yang, Yipeng Lei, Tao Shen, Yong Wang, Linfeng Tian, Zheng J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) has a complex clinical presentation, and there is no consensus on the optimal surgical strategy. This study retrospectively compared the efficacy of different staged operations and simultaneous decompression for patients with TSS. METHODS: We reviewed data from 132 patients with TSS who received surgical procedures from January 2011 to June 2018. Patients were classified into three groups according to the most symptomatic area of compression (group C: first-stage surgery for cervical compression; group L: first-stage surgery for lumbar compression; group CL: simultaneous surgery for both). Medical records were reviewed for age, gender, comorbidities, operation time, combined estimated blood loss, and time of hospitalization. The JOA-C, JOA-L, NDI, and ODI scores, and complications were also examined. RESULTS: Postoperative outcomes were followed for 32.1 ± 5.4 months. There were significant differences in the re-operation rate and the interval time between the two types of staged operations (p = 0.005 and p = 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in gender (p = 0.639), operation time (p = 0.138), combined estimated blood loss (p = 0.116), or complications (p = 0.652) among the three groups, while the simultaneous group was significantly younger (p = 0.027), with fewer comorbidities (p < 0.001) and a shorter hospitalization time (p < 0.001). At the final follow-up, the JOA-C and JOA-L scores were increased, while the NDI and ODI scores were decreased, compared with the preoperative scores. CONCLUSIONS: TSS can be effectively managed by either simultaneous or staged decompressions. First-stage surgery for cervical stenosis significantly lowers the requirement for second-stage lumbar surgery. One-stage simultaneous decompression is safe and effective with the advantage of reduce hospitalization time, without an increase in operative time or bleeding. However, the surgical indications should be strictly controlled and is recommended for younger patients with fewer comorbidities. BioMed Central 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7989104/ /pubmed/33761964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02357-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cao, Junming Gao, Xianda Yang, Yipeng Lei, Tao Shen, Yong Wang, Linfeng Tian, Zheng Simultaneous or staged operation for tandem spinal stenosis: surgical strategy and efficacy comparison |
title | Simultaneous or staged operation for tandem spinal stenosis: surgical strategy and efficacy comparison |
title_full | Simultaneous or staged operation for tandem spinal stenosis: surgical strategy and efficacy comparison |
title_fullStr | Simultaneous or staged operation for tandem spinal stenosis: surgical strategy and efficacy comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Simultaneous or staged operation for tandem spinal stenosis: surgical strategy and efficacy comparison |
title_short | Simultaneous or staged operation for tandem spinal stenosis: surgical strategy and efficacy comparison |
title_sort | simultaneous or staged operation for tandem spinal stenosis: surgical strategy and efficacy comparison |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02357-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caojunming simultaneousorstagedoperationfortandemspinalstenosissurgicalstrategyandefficacycomparison AT gaoxianda simultaneousorstagedoperationfortandemspinalstenosissurgicalstrategyandefficacycomparison AT yangyipeng simultaneousorstagedoperationfortandemspinalstenosissurgicalstrategyandefficacycomparison AT leitao simultaneousorstagedoperationfortandemspinalstenosissurgicalstrategyandefficacycomparison AT shenyong simultaneousorstagedoperationfortandemspinalstenosissurgicalstrategyandefficacycomparison AT wanglinfeng simultaneousorstagedoperationfortandemspinalstenosissurgicalstrategyandefficacycomparison AT tianzheng simultaneousorstagedoperationfortandemspinalstenosissurgicalstrategyandefficacycomparison |