Practice of thyroid nodule management in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries

OBJECTIVES: To assessed the current practices for the management of thyroid nodules in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive web-based survey to physicians and surgeons involved in the management of thyroid nodules. The survey included questions on referral, ultrasound (US) reporting, fine needle aspiration (FNA), management of thyroid nodules including the approach for indeterminate FNA results, and usage of molecular testing. RESULTS: A total of 311 responders, 155 (49.8%) were endocrinologists. Results showed that referrals and US report lack a number of valuable information including family history (84.9%) and high-risk US features (92.9%). Approximately 263 (84.6%) preferred to include a scoring system or protocol to assess the nodule risk in US report. Approximately 193 (62.1%) sent the patient to interventional radiologists for FNA. Almost half (n=147, 47.3%) repeat the FNA in 2-3 months if the FNA result was a follicular lesion or atypia of undetermined significance and 142 (45.7%) opted for lobectomy for follicular neoplasm or suspicious of follicular neoplasm result. Only 44 (14.1%) performed molecular testing; however, 174 (55.9%) preferred it available. Significant variations in the approach were seen between endocrinologists versus non-endocrinologists. CONCLUSION: Practices variation in the management of thyroid nodules mandate a common practical guideline. Molecular testing is a preferable test for indeterminate FNA results by most of the responders though it is not widely available.