Cargando…
Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Regional anaesthesia techniques are a part of perioperative medicine that affects both perioperative and long-term outcomes. We have a paucity of the data on the usage and practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first eff...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776109 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_1161_20 |
_version_ | 1783668947937132544 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Neha Ponde, Vrushali Jagannathan, Balavenkatasubramanian Rao, Parnandi B Dixit, Amit Agarwal, Gaurav |
author_facet | Singh, Neha Ponde, Vrushali Jagannathan, Balavenkatasubramanian Rao, Parnandi B Dixit, Amit Agarwal, Gaurav |
author_sort | Singh, Neha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Regional anaesthesia techniques are a part of perioperative medicine that affects both perioperative and long-term outcomes. We have a paucity of the data on the usage and practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first effort to validate a survey for plexus and PNBs. Subsequently, this questionnaire could be used for the survey to look for the trends and disparities in PNB practices and further to develop a national registry in the future. METHODS: Thirty questions were prepared after evidence-based search and reviewed by experts for suggestions. Changes were done and the questionnaire with the grading sheet was sent to 19 experts. The responses were analysed to calculate the content validity index (CVI) item-wise (I-CVI), scale-wise (S-CVI), and modified kappa statistics. The I-CVI of 0.78 and an S-CVI/average of 0.90 was taken as acceptable with more than six experts. RESULTS: Fourteen experts out of 19 assessed and graded the questions as per the provided sheet and submitted suggestions through the mail. Question reframing, option reconsideration, and change from single to multiple choices were incorporated as per the suggestions of the experts. Mean I-CVI for relevance, simplicity, clarity, and ambiguity was 0.99, 0.98, 0.98, and 0.99, respectively. S-CVI/average was 0.98, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.99 for relevance, simplicity, clarity, and ambiguity, respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that this questionnaire has met the content validity criteria and can be used to study plexus and PNBs practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7989482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79894822021-03-26 Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks Singh, Neha Ponde, Vrushali Jagannathan, Balavenkatasubramanian Rao, Parnandi B Dixit, Amit Agarwal, Gaurav Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Regional anaesthesia techniques are a part of perioperative medicine that affects both perioperative and long-term outcomes. We have a paucity of the data on the usage and practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first effort to validate a survey for plexus and PNBs. Subsequently, this questionnaire could be used for the survey to look for the trends and disparities in PNB practices and further to develop a national registry in the future. METHODS: Thirty questions were prepared after evidence-based search and reviewed by experts for suggestions. Changes were done and the questionnaire with the grading sheet was sent to 19 experts. The responses were analysed to calculate the content validity index (CVI) item-wise (I-CVI), scale-wise (S-CVI), and modified kappa statistics. The I-CVI of 0.78 and an S-CVI/average of 0.90 was taken as acceptable with more than six experts. RESULTS: Fourteen experts out of 19 assessed and graded the questions as per the provided sheet and submitted suggestions through the mail. Question reframing, option reconsideration, and change from single to multiple choices were incorporated as per the suggestions of the experts. Mean I-CVI for relevance, simplicity, clarity, and ambiguity was 0.99, 0.98, 0.98, and 0.99, respectively. S-CVI/average was 0.98, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.99 for relevance, simplicity, clarity, and ambiguity, respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that this questionnaire has met the content validity criteria and can be used to study plexus and PNBs practices. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-03 2021-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7989482/ /pubmed/33776109 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_1161_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Singh, Neha Ponde, Vrushali Jagannathan, Balavenkatasubramanian Rao, Parnandi B Dixit, Amit Agarwal, Gaurav Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks |
title | Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks |
title_full | Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks |
title_short | Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks |
title_sort | development and validation of a questionnaire to study practices and diversities in plexus and peripheral nerve blocks |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776109 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_1161_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhneha developmentandvalidationofaquestionnairetostudypracticesanddiversitiesinplexusandperipheralnerveblocks AT pondevrushali developmentandvalidationofaquestionnairetostudypracticesanddiversitiesinplexusandperipheralnerveblocks AT jagannathanbalavenkatasubramanian developmentandvalidationofaquestionnairetostudypracticesanddiversitiesinplexusandperipheralnerveblocks AT raoparnandib developmentandvalidationofaquestionnairetostudypracticesanddiversitiesinplexusandperipheralnerveblocks AT dixitamit developmentandvalidationofaquestionnairetostudypracticesanddiversitiesinplexusandperipheralnerveblocks AT agarwalgaurav developmentandvalidationofaquestionnairetostudypracticesanddiversitiesinplexusandperipheralnerveblocks |