Cargando…

Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Regional anaesthesia techniques are a part of perioperative medicine that affects both perioperative and long-term outcomes. We have a paucity of the data on the usage and practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Neha, Ponde, Vrushali, Jagannathan, Balavenkatasubramanian, Rao, Parnandi B, Dixit, Amit, Agarwal, Gaurav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776109
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_1161_20
_version_ 1783668947937132544
author Singh, Neha
Ponde, Vrushali
Jagannathan, Balavenkatasubramanian
Rao, Parnandi B
Dixit, Amit
Agarwal, Gaurav
author_facet Singh, Neha
Ponde, Vrushali
Jagannathan, Balavenkatasubramanian
Rao, Parnandi B
Dixit, Amit
Agarwal, Gaurav
author_sort Singh, Neha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Regional anaesthesia techniques are a part of perioperative medicine that affects both perioperative and long-term outcomes. We have a paucity of the data on the usage and practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first effort to validate a survey for plexus and PNBs. Subsequently, this questionnaire could be used for the survey to look for the trends and disparities in PNB practices and further to develop a national registry in the future. METHODS: Thirty questions were prepared after evidence-based search and reviewed by experts for suggestions. Changes were done and the questionnaire with the grading sheet was sent to 19 experts. The responses were analysed to calculate the content validity index (CVI) item-wise (I-CVI), scale-wise (S-CVI), and modified kappa statistics. The I-CVI of 0.78 and an S-CVI/average of 0.90 was taken as acceptable with more than six experts. RESULTS: Fourteen experts out of 19 assessed and graded the questions as per the provided sheet and submitted suggestions through the mail. Question reframing, option reconsideration, and change from single to multiple choices were incorporated as per the suggestions of the experts. Mean I-CVI for relevance, simplicity, clarity, and ambiguity was 0.99, 0.98, 0.98, and 0.99, respectively. S-CVI/average was 0.98, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.99 for relevance, simplicity, clarity, and ambiguity, respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that this questionnaire has met the content validity criteria and can be used to study plexus and PNBs practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7989482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79894822021-03-26 Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks Singh, Neha Ponde, Vrushali Jagannathan, Balavenkatasubramanian Rao, Parnandi B Dixit, Amit Agarwal, Gaurav Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Regional anaesthesia techniques are a part of perioperative medicine that affects both perioperative and long-term outcomes. We have a paucity of the data on the usage and practices of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first effort to validate a survey for plexus and PNBs. Subsequently, this questionnaire could be used for the survey to look for the trends and disparities in PNB practices and further to develop a national registry in the future. METHODS: Thirty questions were prepared after evidence-based search and reviewed by experts for suggestions. Changes were done and the questionnaire with the grading sheet was sent to 19 experts. The responses were analysed to calculate the content validity index (CVI) item-wise (I-CVI), scale-wise (S-CVI), and modified kappa statistics. The I-CVI of 0.78 and an S-CVI/average of 0.90 was taken as acceptable with more than six experts. RESULTS: Fourteen experts out of 19 assessed and graded the questions as per the provided sheet and submitted suggestions through the mail. Question reframing, option reconsideration, and change from single to multiple choices were incorporated as per the suggestions of the experts. Mean I-CVI for relevance, simplicity, clarity, and ambiguity was 0.99, 0.98, 0.98, and 0.99, respectively. S-CVI/average was 0.98, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.99 for relevance, simplicity, clarity, and ambiguity, respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that this questionnaire has met the content validity criteria and can be used to study plexus and PNBs practices. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-03 2021-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7989482/ /pubmed/33776109 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_1161_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Neha
Ponde, Vrushali
Jagannathan, Balavenkatasubramanian
Rao, Parnandi B
Dixit, Amit
Agarwal, Gaurav
Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks
title Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks
title_full Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks
title_fullStr Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks
title_short Development and validation of a Questionnaire to study practices and diversities in Plexus and Peripheral nerve blocks
title_sort development and validation of a questionnaire to study practices and diversities in plexus and peripheral nerve blocks
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776109
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_1161_20
work_keys_str_mv AT singhneha developmentandvalidationofaquestionnairetostudypracticesanddiversitiesinplexusandperipheralnerveblocks
AT pondevrushali developmentandvalidationofaquestionnairetostudypracticesanddiversitiesinplexusandperipheralnerveblocks
AT jagannathanbalavenkatasubramanian developmentandvalidationofaquestionnairetostudypracticesanddiversitiesinplexusandperipheralnerveblocks
AT raoparnandib developmentandvalidationofaquestionnairetostudypracticesanddiversitiesinplexusandperipheralnerveblocks
AT dixitamit developmentandvalidationofaquestionnairetostudypracticesanddiversitiesinplexusandperipheralnerveblocks
AT agarwalgaurav developmentandvalidationofaquestionnairetostudypracticesanddiversitiesinplexusandperipheralnerveblocks