Cargando…

Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats

An efficient and safe drug development process is crucial for the establishment of new drugs on the market aiming to increase quality of life and life-span of our patients. Despite technological advances in the past decade, successful launches of drug candidates per year remain low. We here give an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kreutzer, Fabian Philipp, Meinecke, Anna, Schmidt, Kevin, Fiedler, Jan, Thum, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvab075
_version_ 1783668959573180416
author Kreutzer, Fabian Philipp
Meinecke, Anna
Schmidt, Kevin
Fiedler, Jan
Thum, Thomas
author_facet Kreutzer, Fabian Philipp
Meinecke, Anna
Schmidt, Kevin
Fiedler, Jan
Thum, Thomas
author_sort Kreutzer, Fabian Philipp
collection PubMed
description An efficient and safe drug development process is crucial for the establishment of new drugs on the market aiming to increase quality of life and life-span of our patients. Despite technological advances in the past decade, successful launches of drug candidates per year remain low. We here give an overview about some of these advances and suggest improvements for implementation to boost preclinical and clinical drug development with a focus on the cardiovascular field. We highlight advantages and disadvantages of animal experimentation and thoroughly review alternatives in the field of three-dimensional cell culture as well as preclinical use of spheroids and organoids. Microfluidic devices and their potential as organ-on-a-chip systems, as well as the use of living animal and human cardiac tissues are additionally introduced. In the second part, we examine recent gold standard randomized clinical trials and present possible modifications to increase lead candidate throughput: adaptive designs, master protocols, and drug repurposing. In silico and N-of-1 trials have the potential to redefine clinical drug candidate evaluation. Finally, we briefly discuss clinical trial designs during pandemic times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7989574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79895742021-04-01 Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats Kreutzer, Fabian Philipp Meinecke, Anna Schmidt, Kevin Fiedler, Jan Thum, Thomas Cardiovasc Res Reviews An efficient and safe drug development process is crucial for the establishment of new drugs on the market aiming to increase quality of life and life-span of our patients. Despite technological advances in the past decade, successful launches of drug candidates per year remain low. We here give an overview about some of these advances and suggest improvements for implementation to boost preclinical and clinical drug development with a focus on the cardiovascular field. We highlight advantages and disadvantages of animal experimentation and thoroughly review alternatives in the field of three-dimensional cell culture as well as preclinical use of spheroids and organoids. Microfluidic devices and their potential as organ-on-a-chip systems, as well as the use of living animal and human cardiac tissues are additionally introduced. In the second part, we examine recent gold standard randomized clinical trials and present possible modifications to increase lead candidate throughput: adaptive designs, master protocols, and drug repurposing. In silico and N-of-1 trials have the potential to redefine clinical drug candidate evaluation. Finally, we briefly discuss clinical trial designs during pandemic times. Oxford University Press 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7989574/ /pubmed/33693475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvab075 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Reviews
Kreutzer, Fabian Philipp
Meinecke, Anna
Schmidt, Kevin
Fiedler, Jan
Thum, Thomas
Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats
title Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats
title_full Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats
title_fullStr Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats
title_full_unstemmed Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats
title_short Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats
title_sort alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvab075
work_keys_str_mv AT kreutzerfabianphilipp alternativestrategiesincardiacpreclinicalresearchandnewclinicaltrialformats
AT meineckeanna alternativestrategiesincardiacpreclinicalresearchandnewclinicaltrialformats
AT schmidtkevin alternativestrategiesincardiacpreclinicalresearchandnewclinicaltrialformats
AT fiedlerjan alternativestrategiesincardiacpreclinicalresearchandnewclinicaltrialformats
AT thumthomas alternativestrategiesincardiacpreclinicalresearchandnewclinicaltrialformats