Cargando…
Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats
An efficient and safe drug development process is crucial for the establishment of new drugs on the market aiming to increase quality of life and life-span of our patients. Despite technological advances in the past decade, successful launches of drug candidates per year remain low. We here give an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvab075 |
_version_ | 1783668959573180416 |
---|---|
author | Kreutzer, Fabian Philipp Meinecke, Anna Schmidt, Kevin Fiedler, Jan Thum, Thomas |
author_facet | Kreutzer, Fabian Philipp Meinecke, Anna Schmidt, Kevin Fiedler, Jan Thum, Thomas |
author_sort | Kreutzer, Fabian Philipp |
collection | PubMed |
description | An efficient and safe drug development process is crucial for the establishment of new drugs on the market aiming to increase quality of life and life-span of our patients. Despite technological advances in the past decade, successful launches of drug candidates per year remain low. We here give an overview about some of these advances and suggest improvements for implementation to boost preclinical and clinical drug development with a focus on the cardiovascular field. We highlight advantages and disadvantages of animal experimentation and thoroughly review alternatives in the field of three-dimensional cell culture as well as preclinical use of spheroids and organoids. Microfluidic devices and their potential as organ-on-a-chip systems, as well as the use of living animal and human cardiac tissues are additionally introduced. In the second part, we examine recent gold standard randomized clinical trials and present possible modifications to increase lead candidate throughput: adaptive designs, master protocols, and drug repurposing. In silico and N-of-1 trials have the potential to redefine clinical drug candidate evaluation. Finally, we briefly discuss clinical trial designs during pandemic times. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7989574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79895742021-04-01 Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats Kreutzer, Fabian Philipp Meinecke, Anna Schmidt, Kevin Fiedler, Jan Thum, Thomas Cardiovasc Res Reviews An efficient and safe drug development process is crucial for the establishment of new drugs on the market aiming to increase quality of life and life-span of our patients. Despite technological advances in the past decade, successful launches of drug candidates per year remain low. We here give an overview about some of these advances and suggest improvements for implementation to boost preclinical and clinical drug development with a focus on the cardiovascular field. We highlight advantages and disadvantages of animal experimentation and thoroughly review alternatives in the field of three-dimensional cell culture as well as preclinical use of spheroids and organoids. Microfluidic devices and their potential as organ-on-a-chip systems, as well as the use of living animal and human cardiac tissues are additionally introduced. In the second part, we examine recent gold standard randomized clinical trials and present possible modifications to increase lead candidate throughput: adaptive designs, master protocols, and drug repurposing. In silico and N-of-1 trials have the potential to redefine clinical drug candidate evaluation. Finally, we briefly discuss clinical trial designs during pandemic times. Oxford University Press 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7989574/ /pubmed/33693475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvab075 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Reviews Kreutzer, Fabian Philipp Meinecke, Anna Schmidt, Kevin Fiedler, Jan Thum, Thomas Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats |
title | Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats |
title_full | Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats |
title_fullStr | Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats |
title_short | Alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats |
title_sort | alternative strategies in cardiac preclinical research and new clinical trial formats |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvab075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kreutzerfabianphilipp alternativestrategiesincardiacpreclinicalresearchandnewclinicaltrialformats AT meineckeanna alternativestrategiesincardiacpreclinicalresearchandnewclinicaltrialformats AT schmidtkevin alternativestrategiesincardiacpreclinicalresearchandnewclinicaltrialformats AT fiedlerjan alternativestrategiesincardiacpreclinicalresearchandnewclinicaltrialformats AT thumthomas alternativestrategiesincardiacpreclinicalresearchandnewclinicaltrialformats |