Cargando…

Developing a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation with patients, carers and clinicians: a Delphi survey to inform content of the iFraP complex consultation intervention

SUMMARY: Fracture Liaison Services are recommended to deliver best practice in secondary fracture prevention. This modified Delphi survey, as part of the iFraP (Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug Treatments) study, provides consensus regarding tasks for clinicians in a model Fracture Liais...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bullock, Laurna, Crawford-Manning, Fay, Cottrell, Elizabeth, Fleming, Jane, Leyland, Sarah, Edwards, John, Clark, Emma M, Thomas, Simon, Chapman, Stephen, Gidlow, Christopher, Iglesias, Cynthia P, Protheroe, Joanne, Horne, Robert, O’Neill, Terence W, Mallen, Christian, Jinks, Clare, Paskins, Zoe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00913-w
_version_ 1783668974560477184
author Bullock, Laurna
Crawford-Manning, Fay
Cottrell, Elizabeth
Fleming, Jane
Leyland, Sarah
Edwards, John
Clark, Emma M
Thomas, Simon
Chapman, Stephen
Gidlow, Christopher
Iglesias, Cynthia P
Protheroe, Joanne
Horne, Robert
O’Neill, Terence W
Mallen, Christian
Jinks, Clare
Paskins, Zoe
author_facet Bullock, Laurna
Crawford-Manning, Fay
Cottrell, Elizabeth
Fleming, Jane
Leyland, Sarah
Edwards, John
Clark, Emma M
Thomas, Simon
Chapman, Stephen
Gidlow, Christopher
Iglesias, Cynthia P
Protheroe, Joanne
Horne, Robert
O’Neill, Terence W
Mallen, Christian
Jinks, Clare
Paskins, Zoe
author_sort Bullock, Laurna
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: Fracture Liaison Services are recommended to deliver best practice in secondary fracture prevention. This modified Delphi survey, as part of the iFraP (Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug Treatments) study, provides consensus regarding tasks for clinicians in a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation. PURPOSE: The clinical consultation is of pivotal importance in addressing barriers to treatment adherence. The aim of this study was to agree to the content of the ‘model Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) consultation’ within the iFraP (Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug Treatments) study. METHODS: A Delphi survey was co-designed with patients and clinical stakeholders using an evidence synthesis of current guidelines and content from frameworks and theories of shared decision-making, communication and medicine adherence. Patients with osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures, their carers, FLS clinicians and osteoporosis specialists were sent three rounds of the Delphi survey. Participants were presented with potential consultation content and asked to rate their perception of the importance of each statement on a 5-point Likert scale and to suggest new statements (Round 1). Lowest rated statements were removed or amended after Rounds 1 and 2. In Round 3, participants were asked whether each statement was ‘essential’ and percentage agreement calculated; the study team subsequently determined the threshold for essential content. RESULTS: Seventy-two, 49 and 52 patients, carers and clinicians responded to Rounds 1, 2 and 3 respectively. One hundred twenty-two statements were considered. By Round 3, consensus was reached, with 81 statements deemed essential within FLS consultations, relating to greeting/introductions; gathering information; considering therapeutic options; eliciting patient perceptions; establishing shared decision-making preferences; sharing information about osteoporosis and treatments; checking understanding/summarising; and signposting next steps. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi consensus exercise has summarised for the first time patient/carer and clinician consensus regarding clearly defined tasks for clinicians in a model FLS consultation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11657-021-00913-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7989712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79897122021-03-25 Developing a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation with patients, carers and clinicians: a Delphi survey to inform content of the iFraP complex consultation intervention Bullock, Laurna Crawford-Manning, Fay Cottrell, Elizabeth Fleming, Jane Leyland, Sarah Edwards, John Clark, Emma M Thomas, Simon Chapman, Stephen Gidlow, Christopher Iglesias, Cynthia P Protheroe, Joanne Horne, Robert O’Neill, Terence W Mallen, Christian Jinks, Clare Paskins, Zoe Arch Osteoporos Original Article SUMMARY: Fracture Liaison Services are recommended to deliver best practice in secondary fracture prevention. This modified Delphi survey, as part of the iFraP (Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug Treatments) study, provides consensus regarding tasks for clinicians in a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation. PURPOSE: The clinical consultation is of pivotal importance in addressing barriers to treatment adherence. The aim of this study was to agree to the content of the ‘model Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) consultation’ within the iFraP (Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug Treatments) study. METHODS: A Delphi survey was co-designed with patients and clinical stakeholders using an evidence synthesis of current guidelines and content from frameworks and theories of shared decision-making, communication and medicine adherence. Patients with osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures, their carers, FLS clinicians and osteoporosis specialists were sent three rounds of the Delphi survey. Participants were presented with potential consultation content and asked to rate their perception of the importance of each statement on a 5-point Likert scale and to suggest new statements (Round 1). Lowest rated statements were removed or amended after Rounds 1 and 2. In Round 3, participants were asked whether each statement was ‘essential’ and percentage agreement calculated; the study team subsequently determined the threshold for essential content. RESULTS: Seventy-two, 49 and 52 patients, carers and clinicians responded to Rounds 1, 2 and 3 respectively. One hundred twenty-two statements were considered. By Round 3, consensus was reached, with 81 statements deemed essential within FLS consultations, relating to greeting/introductions; gathering information; considering therapeutic options; eliciting patient perceptions; establishing shared decision-making preferences; sharing information about osteoporosis and treatments; checking understanding/summarising; and signposting next steps. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi consensus exercise has summarised for the first time patient/carer and clinician consensus regarding clearly defined tasks for clinicians in a model FLS consultation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11657-021-00913-w. Springer London 2021-03-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7989712/ /pubmed/33761007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00913-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Bullock, Laurna
Crawford-Manning, Fay
Cottrell, Elizabeth
Fleming, Jane
Leyland, Sarah
Edwards, John
Clark, Emma M
Thomas, Simon
Chapman, Stephen
Gidlow, Christopher
Iglesias, Cynthia P
Protheroe, Joanne
Horne, Robert
O’Neill, Terence W
Mallen, Christian
Jinks, Clare
Paskins, Zoe
Developing a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation with patients, carers and clinicians: a Delphi survey to inform content of the iFraP complex consultation intervention
title Developing a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation with patients, carers and clinicians: a Delphi survey to inform content of the iFraP complex consultation intervention
title_full Developing a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation with patients, carers and clinicians: a Delphi survey to inform content of the iFraP complex consultation intervention
title_fullStr Developing a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation with patients, carers and clinicians: a Delphi survey to inform content of the iFraP complex consultation intervention
title_full_unstemmed Developing a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation with patients, carers and clinicians: a Delphi survey to inform content of the iFraP complex consultation intervention
title_short Developing a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation with patients, carers and clinicians: a Delphi survey to inform content of the iFraP complex consultation intervention
title_sort developing a model fracture liaison service consultation with patients, carers and clinicians: a delphi survey to inform content of the ifrap complex consultation intervention
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00913-w
work_keys_str_mv AT bullocklaurna developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT crawfordmanningfay developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT cottrellelizabeth developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT flemingjane developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT leylandsarah developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT edwardsjohn developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT clarkemmam developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT thomassimon developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT chapmanstephen developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT gidlowchristopher developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT iglesiascynthiap developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT protheroejoanne developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT hornerobert developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT oneillterencew developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT mallenchristian developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT jinksclare developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention
AT paskinszoe developingamodelfractureliaisonserviceconsultationwithpatientscarersandcliniciansadelphisurveytoinformcontentoftheifrapcomplexconsultationintervention