Cargando…

Evaluation of Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions-Correlated Markers as Triage Strategy for Colposcopy After Co-Testing

BACKGROUND: Colposcopy was referred in cases with severe abnormalities in co-testing. Although p16/Ki67 dual staining reduced the referral rate, its sensitivity and specificity need to be enhanced. METHODS: The expressions of p16, Ki-67, SMAD3, YAP1, RELA were evaluated in the colposcopy referral po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huo, Xiao, Sun, Hengzi, Cao, Dongyan, Yang, Jiaxin, Peng, Peng, Kong, Linghua, Chen, Fei, Shen, Keng, Li, Shuhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776454
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S300269
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Colposcopy was referred in cases with severe abnormalities in co-testing. Although p16/Ki67 dual staining reduced the referral rate, its sensitivity and specificity need to be enhanced. METHODS: The expressions of p16, Ki-67, SMAD3, YAP1, RELA were evaluated in the colposcopy referral population. The inclusion criteria included 30–60 years and diagnosed with HPV16/18-positive, other HR-HPV-positive with ASCUS, LSIL, AGC (atypical glandular cell) in co-testing. Colposcopies, endocervical curettages of cervical biopsies were also collected. Cases were excluded if there were no biopsies, if the interval between a cervical screening test and biopsies was more than 6 months, or if insufficient tissue was available as a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded block. The pathology was independently reviewed by two pathologists. Discrepant interpretations were adjudicated by a third pathologist. RESULTS: In total, 1194 of 1273 cases who were referred to colposcopy were evaluated in the present study. The sensitivity and specificity of p16+ combined with Ki-67+ for predicting CIN2+ were 62.1% and 89.5%, respectively. p16+ combined with YAP1+ and/or RELA+ provided a sensitivity and specificity of 70.9% and 89.5%, respectively, while 72.8% and 86.4% were achieved by p16+ combined with YAP1+ and/or SMAD3+ and/or RELA+. In HPV16/18+ and LSIL subgroups, the sensitivity and specificity of p16+ combined with Ki-67+ for predicting CIN2+ were 67.7% and 87.6%, respectively, for the former group and 58.6%, 88.8%, respectively, for the latter group. p16+, YAP1+/RELA+ showed a better performance for predicting CIN2+ with a better sensitivity and considerable specificity in the other HPV+ combined with ASCUS group than were achieved by p16+ combined with Ki-67+. RELA+ and the combination of p16 and RELA/YAP1 also provided the Max AUC area. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that RELA and the combination of p16 and RELA/YAP1 achieved better sensitivity and specificity for detecting morphologically CIN2+ lesions.