Cargando…

Pedicled Abdominal Flaps for Hand Reconstruction in Adults: Physiotherapy of the Attached Hand

BACKGROUND: Hand reconstruction using pedicled abdominal flaps has several disadvantages, including delayed hand therapy leading to stiffness. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 70 cases of pedicled abdominal flaps used for hand reconstruction in adults in whom physiotherapy of the attached h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Qattan, Mohammad M., Alammar, Alwaleed K., Alfaqeeh, Faisal A., Altamimi, Lamees A., Alfehaid, Norah S., Mahabbat, Nehal A., Pant, Rajeev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7989987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003474
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Hand reconstruction using pedicled abdominal flaps has several disadvantages, including delayed hand therapy leading to stiffness. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 70 cases of pedicled abdominal flaps used for hand reconstruction in adults in whom physiotherapy of the attached hand was implemented. The review aims to investigate the rate of flap dehiscence, infection, hematoma, and flap edge necrosis in our cases, and to establish that physiotherapy of the attached hand is not associated with an increased risk of complications. The review also aims to establish the effectiveness of physiotherapy of the attached hand in reducing the risk of stiffness by documenting the range of motion of the uninjured digits immediately after flap division and at final follow-up. RESULTS: There were no cases of flap dehiscence, infection, or hematoma. Six cases had minor partial flap edge necrosis that was treated conservatively and allowed to heal by secondary intention. In 62 patients, the range of motion of the uninjured digits was 90%–100% of the normal range of motion at day 1 post-flap division, and all of these patients recovered a full range of motion (in the uninjured digits) within 2 weeks of follow-up. Eight patients were reluctant to do the exercises as instructed because of low pain threshold; 4 of these 8 patients had residual stiffness at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: The implementation of active exercises of the attached hand is feasible in selected cases and it helps minimize the risk of stiffness of the hand.