Cargando…

Use of Services by People Living Alone With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Formal supports and social services are essential to people living alone with cognitive impairment (PLACI) because they are at risk of negative health outcomes and lack cohabitants who may support them with cognitively demanding tasks. To further our understanding of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenwohl-Mack, Amy, Dubbin, Leslie, Chodos, Anna, Dulaney, Sarah, Fang, Min-Lin, Merrilees, Jennifer, Portacolone, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33796795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab004
_version_ 1783669010004443136
author Rosenwohl-Mack, Amy
Dubbin, Leslie
Chodos, Anna
Dulaney, Sarah
Fang, Min-Lin
Merrilees, Jennifer
Portacolone, Elena
author_facet Rosenwohl-Mack, Amy
Dubbin, Leslie
Chodos, Anna
Dulaney, Sarah
Fang, Min-Lin
Merrilees, Jennifer
Portacolone, Elena
author_sort Rosenwohl-Mack, Amy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Formal supports and social services are essential to people living alone with cognitive impairment (PLACI) because they are at risk of negative health outcomes and lack cohabitants who may support them with cognitively demanding tasks. To further our understanding of this critical and worldwide issue, we conducted a systematic review to understand whether, and how, PLACI access and use essential formal supports and services. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We searched 6 databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Sociological Abstracts) to identify quantitative and mixed-method literature on formal service use among PLACI. The initial search was conducted in 2018 and updated in 2020. RESULTS: We identified 32 studies published between 1992 and 2019, representing 13 countries, that met our criteria: 16 reported on health services and 26 on social services. Most studies compared PLACI with people with cognitive impairment living with others. Health service use was lower or similar among PLACI, as opposed to counterparts living with others. Most studies reported a higher use of social services (e.g., home services) among PLACI than those living with others. Overall use of essential home service among PLACI was higher in Europe than in the United States, a country where large portions of PLACI were reported receiving no formal services. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: We identified wide variability among countries and major gaps in service use. Results for use of health services were mixed, although our findings suggest that PLACI may have fewer physician visits than counterparts living with others. Our findings suggest that varying policies and budgets for these services among countries may have affected our findings. We encourage researchers to evaluate and compare the influence of social policies in the well-being of PLACI. We also encourage policy makers to prioritize the needs of PLACI in national dementia strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7990060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79900602021-03-31 Use of Services by People Living Alone With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review Rosenwohl-Mack, Amy Dubbin, Leslie Chodos, Anna Dulaney, Sarah Fang, Min-Lin Merrilees, Jennifer Portacolone, Elena Innov Aging Scholarly Review BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Formal supports and social services are essential to people living alone with cognitive impairment (PLACI) because they are at risk of negative health outcomes and lack cohabitants who may support them with cognitively demanding tasks. To further our understanding of this critical and worldwide issue, we conducted a systematic review to understand whether, and how, PLACI access and use essential formal supports and services. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We searched 6 databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Sociological Abstracts) to identify quantitative and mixed-method literature on formal service use among PLACI. The initial search was conducted in 2018 and updated in 2020. RESULTS: We identified 32 studies published between 1992 and 2019, representing 13 countries, that met our criteria: 16 reported on health services and 26 on social services. Most studies compared PLACI with people with cognitive impairment living with others. Health service use was lower or similar among PLACI, as opposed to counterparts living with others. Most studies reported a higher use of social services (e.g., home services) among PLACI than those living with others. Overall use of essential home service among PLACI was higher in Europe than in the United States, a country where large portions of PLACI were reported receiving no formal services. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: We identified wide variability among countries and major gaps in service use. Results for use of health services were mixed, although our findings suggest that PLACI may have fewer physician visits than counterparts living with others. Our findings suggest that varying policies and budgets for these services among countries may have affected our findings. We encourage researchers to evaluate and compare the influence of social policies in the well-being of PLACI. We also encourage policy makers to prioritize the needs of PLACI in national dementia strategies. Oxford University Press 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7990060/ /pubmed/33796795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab004 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Scholarly Review
Rosenwohl-Mack, Amy
Dubbin, Leslie
Chodos, Anna
Dulaney, Sarah
Fang, Min-Lin
Merrilees, Jennifer
Portacolone, Elena
Use of Services by People Living Alone With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review
title Use of Services by People Living Alone With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review
title_full Use of Services by People Living Alone With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Use of Services by People Living Alone With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Use of Services by People Living Alone With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review
title_short Use of Services by People Living Alone With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review
title_sort use of services by people living alone with cognitive impairment: a systematic review
topic Scholarly Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33796795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab004
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenwohlmackamy useofservicesbypeoplelivingalonewithcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT dubbinleslie useofservicesbypeoplelivingalonewithcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT chodosanna useofservicesbypeoplelivingalonewithcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT dulaneysarah useofservicesbypeoplelivingalonewithcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT fangminlin useofservicesbypeoplelivingalonewithcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT merrileesjennifer useofservicesbypeoplelivingalonewithcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT portacoloneelena useofservicesbypeoplelivingalonewithcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview