Cargando…

A systematic review of studies that used NIRS to measure neural activation during emotion processing in healthy individuals

Functional neuroimaging provides an avenue for earlier diagnosis and tailored treatment of psychological disorders characterised by emotional impairment. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) offers ecological advantages compared to other neuroimaging techniques and suitability of measuring regions invo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westgarth, Matthew M P, Hogan, Christy A, Neumann, David L, Shum, David H K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33528022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab017
_version_ 1783669011841548288
author Westgarth, Matthew M P
Hogan, Christy A
Neumann, David L
Shum, David H K
author_facet Westgarth, Matthew M P
Hogan, Christy A
Neumann, David L
Shum, David H K
author_sort Westgarth, Matthew M P
collection PubMed
description Functional neuroimaging provides an avenue for earlier diagnosis and tailored treatment of psychological disorders characterised by emotional impairment. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) offers ecological advantages compared to other neuroimaging techniques and suitability of measuring regions involved in emotion functions. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the capacity of NIRS to detect activation during emotion processing and to provide recommendations for future research. Following a comprehensive literature search, we reviewed 85 journal articles, which compared activation during emotional experience, regulation or perception with either a neutral condition or baseline period among healthy participants. The quantitative synthesis of outcomes was limited to thematical analysis, owing to the lack of standardisation between studies. Although most studies found increased prefrontal activity during emotional experience and regulation, the findings were more inconsistent for emotion perception. Some researchers reported increased activity during the task, some reported decreases, some no significant changes, and some reported mixed findings depending on the valence and region. We propose that variations in the cognitive task and stimuli, recruited sample, and measurement and analysis of data are the primary causes of inconsistency. Recommendations to improve consistency in future research by carefully considering the choice of population, cognitive task and analysis approach are provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7990068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79900682021-03-31 A systematic review of studies that used NIRS to measure neural activation during emotion processing in healthy individuals Westgarth, Matthew M P Hogan, Christy A Neumann, David L Shum, David H K Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Manuscript Functional neuroimaging provides an avenue for earlier diagnosis and tailored treatment of psychological disorders characterised by emotional impairment. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) offers ecological advantages compared to other neuroimaging techniques and suitability of measuring regions involved in emotion functions. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the capacity of NIRS to detect activation during emotion processing and to provide recommendations for future research. Following a comprehensive literature search, we reviewed 85 journal articles, which compared activation during emotional experience, regulation or perception with either a neutral condition or baseline period among healthy participants. The quantitative synthesis of outcomes was limited to thematical analysis, owing to the lack of standardisation between studies. Although most studies found increased prefrontal activity during emotional experience and regulation, the findings were more inconsistent for emotion perception. Some researchers reported increased activity during the task, some reported decreases, some no significant changes, and some reported mixed findings depending on the valence and region. We propose that variations in the cognitive task and stimuli, recruited sample, and measurement and analysis of data are the primary causes of inconsistency. Recommendations to improve consistency in future research by carefully considering the choice of population, cognitive task and analysis approach are provided. Oxford University Press 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7990068/ /pubmed/33528022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab017 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Westgarth, Matthew M P
Hogan, Christy A
Neumann, David L
Shum, David H K
A systematic review of studies that used NIRS to measure neural activation during emotion processing in healthy individuals
title A systematic review of studies that used NIRS to measure neural activation during emotion processing in healthy individuals
title_full A systematic review of studies that used NIRS to measure neural activation during emotion processing in healthy individuals
title_fullStr A systematic review of studies that used NIRS to measure neural activation during emotion processing in healthy individuals
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of studies that used NIRS to measure neural activation during emotion processing in healthy individuals
title_short A systematic review of studies that used NIRS to measure neural activation during emotion processing in healthy individuals
title_sort systematic review of studies that used nirs to measure neural activation during emotion processing in healthy individuals
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33528022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab017
work_keys_str_mv AT westgarthmatthewmp asystematicreviewofstudiesthatusednirstomeasureneuralactivationduringemotionprocessinginhealthyindividuals
AT hoganchristya asystematicreviewofstudiesthatusednirstomeasureneuralactivationduringemotionprocessinginhealthyindividuals
AT neumanndavidl asystematicreviewofstudiesthatusednirstomeasureneuralactivationduringemotionprocessinginhealthyindividuals
AT shumdavidhk asystematicreviewofstudiesthatusednirstomeasureneuralactivationduringemotionprocessinginhealthyindividuals
AT westgarthmatthewmp systematicreviewofstudiesthatusednirstomeasureneuralactivationduringemotionprocessinginhealthyindividuals
AT hoganchristya systematicreviewofstudiesthatusednirstomeasureneuralactivationduringemotionprocessinginhealthyindividuals
AT neumanndavidl systematicreviewofstudiesthatusednirstomeasureneuralactivationduringemotionprocessinginhealthyindividuals
AT shumdavidhk systematicreviewofstudiesthatusednirstomeasureneuralactivationduringemotionprocessinginhealthyindividuals